Livestock Research for Rural Development 19 (10) 2007 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Evaluation of cactus cladodes as a partial feed for growing rabbits in the Gaza Strip

B M Zabut, I A Alqedra* and K N Abushammalah**

Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, IUG, Gaza, Palestine
bzabut@iugaza.edu.ps
* Ministry of Agriculture, Gaza, Palestine.
** Department of Biological Sciences, IUG, Gaza, Palestine.

Abstract

To evaluate use of cactus Opuntia cladodes (COC) under unavoidable conditions as a partial feed on the growth performance, organs and carcass weights of growing rabbits under small scale growth conditions.  The study design was a case-control. It was carried out on the local weaned rabbits (n=48), aged 35-40 days and average initial live weights was about 550 g. The period of study was 8 weeks. The rabbits were classified randomly to four different groups. One was a control group and the others were case groups. The control group (C) was fed ad libitum on only high protein pellets, which is commercially called Anber (RPA). Case groups were labeled trial 1 (T1), trail 2 (T2), and trial 3 (T3) and were fed ad-libitum COC and 80 %, 60 % and 40 % RPA, respectively. The actual nutrient contents of the two feeds were examined in Al-Azhar University food analysis labs. SPSS system was used to analyze data.

 

COC feed was found to be poor in crude protein. Dry matter values for RPA and COC were 86.4 % and 16.0 %, respectively. COC had lower crude fibers, fats, and nitrogen free extract than RPA. The growth rates of the growing rabbits were 26.31, 21.20, 18.56, and 10.64 g/day for C, T1, T2, and T3 trials, respectively. Feed conversion ratios based on RPA consumption were 3.33, 3.01, 2.85, and 3.25, for C, T1, T2, and T3 trials, respectively. Partial COC feed decreased average  of internal body fat tissues and some organs weights of the rabbits. In contrast, 40 % RPA diet and ad libitum COC feed increased average of liver weights of the rabbits.  

 

It can be concluded that COC feed as available and very low cost feed can be used as a partial feed to maintain domesticated rabbits growth under unavoidable economical and/or political conditions in the Gaza Strip.

Key words: Cactus Opuntia cladodes, rabbitary pellets, rabbits, small-scale growth condition


Introduction

Rabbits production is beneficial mainly in the rural and sub urban areas under management system with pellet-based feeds as the principle feed sources.  The high cost of the commercial concentrated diets limits the successful production of rabbits in the Gaza Strip (El-Shawa 1988). Feeding of rabbits has a strong influence on breeding, fertility, conception, kindling, nursing, growth, and resistance to disease. However, a well balanced, palatable diet should be available to rabbits at all times in amounts which will adequately supply their nutritional needs. Weaned growing rabbits require about 100 g RPA/ day and other supplements are not needed (El-Shawa 1988).

 

Rabbit meat is one of the most nutritious meats available. It is highest in protein of high quality, lowest in fat and cholesterol, has the least number of calories per pound and has only 8 percent bone (Jones 1990). Unlike wild rabbit, domesticated rabbit meat is pearly white, tender, juicy and mild in flavor (Handa et al 1995).

 

Opuntia used throughout this study refer to the whole genus, of which the most widely known is Opuntia ficus-indica. Previously, Opuntia was used almost interchangeably with cactus pear and prickly pear. Cactus is a desertification plant and a highly palatable to wild and domesticated rabbits (Hoffman et al 1993; Felker 1995). This plant resists diseases, tolerates a variety of climate conditions and excessive cutting (Ruiz-Feria et al 1996).Opuntia have become an endless source of products and functions, initially as a wild plant and, later, as a crop for both subsistence and market-oriented agriculture, contributing to the food security of populations in agriculturally marginalized areas (Nobel 1995; Felker 1995). 

 

COC feed is documented to be high in moisture content and low in dry matter (Gregory and Felker 1992). It can provide a good complement when fed to Livestock in combination with semi-arid adapted, nitrogen–fixing, and high protein plants such as leucaena and mesquite (Russell and Felker 1987). Ruiz-Feria et at (1996) evaluated New Zealand white rabbits using COC and Mesquite (Prosopis Glandosavar. Glandulasa) as forage sources based on growth. They found that rabbit fed 50 % cactus were 293 g heavier than rabbits fed 50 % mesquite (p<0.01) because mesquite had low observed palatability compared to cactus. Ruiz-Feria et al (1998) also evaluated rabbit growth performance using leucaena and cactus forages. They reported that leucaena fed rabbits had the poorest performance, but when fed with 10 % level cactus, growth and carcass traits were improved. 

 

Nevertheless, feed is very important for raising rabbits because it accounts for most of production costs.  In the Gaza strip, most people are very poor and domesticated rabbits eat a very expensive commercial high protein pellets (e.g. RPA) that are irregularly imported from Israel due to the chronic political problems.  These pellets are not made in the Gaza strip because of lack of lyophilized hay materials. Moreover, information is limited in the literature on the response of growing rabbits to COC as partial replacement of concentrated high protein feeds. The main objective of this study, therefore, is to evaluate the use of prickly pear cactus as a partial replacement of the commonly used RPA diet on growth, carcass, and organs weights performances of growing local weaned rabbits.

 

Material and methods

 

The study design was a case-control. The case groups were the rabbits that fed ad libitum COC and partial amounts of RPA diet. The control group was only fed RPA diet. Both groups matched each other in initial body weight, water supplementation, and all other environmental conditions.

 

The hypothesis under investigation was that whether rabbits partially fed RPA and ad libitum COC were more likely to have growth rate, carcass and body organs weights to those rabbits fed only RPA.

 

The experiment carried out at rabbit unit of Khalil Abu-Shamalah’s Farm, El-Zwadia Town, Mid-Zone Governorate, Gaza. It started at April 2006 and ended at June 2006.

 

 Forty-eight local weaned rabbits of mixed breed and sexes used for this study were purchased at 35-40 days of age from the General Economic Consumer Establishment, El-Sakhra, Gaza. To commence the trial, the rabbits were weight individually and distributed into 4 groups of similar average initial live weights of about 550 g. The period of study was 8 weeks. The rabbits housed in metallic cages provided with feeder and drinking cups. The area of each cage was 0.35 m2. Housing and other management practices maintained similar for all treatment groups.

 

The  rabbits assigned into 3 case groups and one control group with 6 replications of two rabbit each. Animals on each treatment diet randomly allocated to cages in a manner to ensure equitable treatment distribution within the farm. The farm was well aerated and sun lighted.

 

The C group was fed ad libitum RPA diet. T1, T2, and T3 case groups were fed diets consisted of ad-libitum COC and 80 %, 60 %, 40 % RPA, respectively. Throughout the study, the restricted feeding levels of cases were determined based on consumption of the control rabbits in the previous day. In addition, wild typed COC middle aged (1-2 years) were harvest daily from the same research plot and were placed randomly as small squared spineless cactus pads in the rabbit forage feeders on the same day of collection. Water provided continuously with tetracycline (1gm/l) for 1st two weeks to protect the rabbits from bacterial infection. All feeds will be offered in the morning after collection of the left over. Live weight change recorded weekly until the end of the trail. Feeds offered and the left–over recorded daily for each treatment to determine average daily feed intake. Feed conversion ratio was determined by dividing the value of average daily feed intake (based on RPA consumption) by that of average daily live weight gain for each study group.

 

At the end of the feeding trial, while rabbits age was 60 days, four rabbits were selected from each treatment based on the group average weight for slaughtering in order to evaluate internal organs and carcass weights. Before slaughtering, the animals were starved overnight to clear the guts and the live weights were recorded. The skin with fur was removed carefully. Evisceration of the carcasses was carried out and the internal organs were weighted separately and expressed as an average and a standard error of mean (SEM). Head, feet and tail were removed to obtain the dressed carcass weight.

 

The actual nutrient contents of the two feeds were examined in Al-Azhar university food analysis labs. All obtained data were analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS system (Version 13). Difference between variables was considered statistically significant if p value < 0.05.
 

 
Results and discussions

 

Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the RPA diet. The analysis of RPA diet was compared with ingredients percentage shown on the commercial label. There was a clear decrease in the actual concentrations of the total crude protein (CP), crude fibers (CF) and ash. In contrast, there was a clear increase in the actual concentration of salt and Mg.


Table 1.  Percentage of chemical composition of RPA

Ingredients

*labeled

**tested

Total protein

17.0

12.7

Water

13.0

13.6

Total fats

3.5

3.41

Fibers

10.5

6.81

Ash

7.5

5.0

Calcium

0.80

0.67

Phosphorous

0.60

0.51

Salt

0.65

1.31

Magnesium

0.04(mg/kg)

0.06 (mg/kg)

Along with it contain Nitrogen free extracts, vitamins, and some mineral.

 *According to the commercial label

**According to results of Al-Azhar University Food Analysis Labs. The values area given are average of duplicate samples.


Table 2 shows the chemical compositions of the COC used for partial feeding of the growing rabbits. It is clear that COC feed is poor in crude protein and rich in water. According to tables1 and 2, dry matter (DM) values for RPA and COC were 86.4 % and 16.0 %, respectively.


Table 2.   Chemical composition of COC  (% wet basis)

Ingredients

COC, %a

Moisture

84.0

Crude protein

8.7

Crude fibers

2.9

Fat contents

0.02

Ash

1.2

Carbohydrates

7.0

Nitrogen free extract

10.9

Calcium, mg/kg

11.0

Iron, mg/kg

1.3

aThe values given are average of duplicate samples


These findings about general percentage of COC composition are consistent with those reported by Gregory and Felker 1992 and Nefzaoui 1995. They found that CP content of the cactus is lower than 5 % of DM. In this study, COC had also lower CF, fats, nitrogen free extract and ash than RPA.  In contrast to these findings, Ruiza-Feria et al (1998) reported that COC (% DM basis) contains 9.3 % CP and 10.5 % CF. Nefzaoui and Ben Salem (2005) reported that the average value of CF and ash are about 10 % and 20 of the DM, respectively. These contradictions of results about CP, CF, and ash contents of COC indicate that chemical composition of COC are very heterogeneous depending on COC surrounding environmental conditions and age. However, Gonzalez (1989) reported that N and P fertilizers increased CP content of COC from 4.5 % to 10.5 % of DM. Moreover, Retamal et al (1987) reported that the CP contents decrease (5 to 3 % DM) and CF increase (9 to 20 % DM) when COC’ ages move from 1 to 5 years.

 

COC also contain micro-amounts of calcium more than iron (Table 2). In agreement with this finding, recent investigations have shown that COC are rich in calcium solutes and poor in other minerals such as K, P, and Na (Nefzaoui 1995; Nefzaoui and Ben Salem 2005).

 

Table 3 shows that average of final body weights of the rabbits aged 56 days decreased significantly with decreasing percentage of RPA diet (p< 0.05)


Table 3.   Effect of partially COC intakes on average (SEM) growth performances of the grower rabbits

Average body weight

Dietary group

C

T1

T2

T3

P

Initial, g

551±0.18

548±0.15

555±0.20

550±0.17

NS

Final, g

2,024 ± 0.21a

1,740 ± 0.10b

1,600 ± 0.14c

1,150d ± 0.20d

S

Total, g

1473 ± 0.01a

1188 ± 0.02b

1040 ± 0.36c

596 ±0.38d

S

Growth rate, g/day

26.31± 0.02a

21.20±0.03b

18.57±0.27c

10.64±0.31d

S

Means with difference superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p <0.05)


The highest growth rate on the RPA diet would appear to be logical consequence of the superior amino acids balance of this complete protein diet, compared with COC feed. However, the average growth rate of the rabbits was 26.31, 21.20, 18.57, and 10.64 g/day for the C, T1, T2, and T3, respectively. Thus, growth rate of the rabbits was in the range of 10 to 26 g/day.  The RPA diet as a sole source of supplementary protein gave the highest growth rate compared to many other high protein concentrate feeds reported in the literature (Rahim et al 1997; Roy et al 2002; Amaefule et al 2005; Mbanya et al 2005; Orunmuyi et al 2006; Onimisi and Omage 2006). These differences in average of growth rates of the rabbits may be due to variations in age, genotypes, and different environmental conditions.

 

Table 4 shows that average daily RPA diet intakes of the C, T1, T2, and T3 trials were 87.6, 63.8, 53.0, and 34.6, respectively. Thus, It appears that the differences in the growth rates were due to the differences in the daily RPA diet intakes of the growing rabbits. However, feed conversion ratios based on RPA diet consumption for C, T1, T2, and T3 were 3.33, 3.01, 2.85, and 3.25.


Table 4.  Average (SEM) RPA intake and feed conversion ratio of growing rabbits partially fed ad-libitum COC

Parameters

Dietary groups

C

T1

T2

T3

P. Value

Initial RPA, g

56 ± 0.23a

40 ± 0.22b

31± 0.20c

23d ± 0.12

S

Final RPA, g

115 ± 0.13a

79 ±0.29b

70 ±0.11c

45 ±0.02d

S

Average daily Intake, g

87.60 ± 0.17a

63.80 ± 0.25b

53.00 ± 0.17c

34.60 ± 0.08d

S

Feed conversion

3.33 ± 0.25a

3.0 ± 0.016b

2.85 ± 0.15c

3.25 ± 0.01a

S

Means with difference superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p <0.05)


The slight difference of feed conversion between C and T1 or T2 reflects slower growth rate and higher sparing of costly RPA diet. No significant difference of feed conversion between C and T3 was observed (p> 0.05) because the daily intake of RPA diet in T3 trial was 40 % of C. Thus, feed conversion ratios based on RPA diet intake did not reflect true growth efficiency of the growing rabbits, and COC feed played a minor role in the growth rate. In T1 trial, rabbits consumed about 70 % of their diet from RPA and about 10 % of it was left over. Thus, COC is highly palatable for growing rabbits. This finding is very consistent with those reported by Gregory and Felker (1992). Moreover, during the experiment only 1, 3, 3, and 2 rabbits died in C1, T1, T2, and T3 trials, respectively. Surprisingly, 2 rabbits only died in T3 trial indicating that domesticated growing rabbits can tolerate partially COC feed under unavoidable conditions.

 

Results of body organs and carcass characteristics (Table 5) showed that skin, head, and kidneys/spleen/lungs are significantly different between C, and T1 or T2 and T3. T1 and T2 trials did not differ in average of these organs weights.


Table 5.   Effect of partially COC intake on some average (SEM) organs weight, body fat and carcass weight of the growing rabbits

Average organs and carcass weight, g

Dietary groups

C

T1

T2

T3

P

Skin

206 ± 0.12a

137 ± 0.18b

134 ± 0.12b

108 ± 0.21c

S

Head

200 ± 0.14a

152 ± 0.08b

149 ± 0.13b

129 ± 0.03c

S

Legs

85 ±0.09a

58 ±0.08b

64 ±0.14c

46.50 ± 0.12d

S

Vesira

187 ±0.08a

150 ±0.19b

133 ±  0.02c

111 ±0.11d

S

Liver

61± 0.02b

52 ± 0.21b

52 ± 0.21c

70 ± 0.18a

S

Kidney, Spleen and lungs

49 ± 0.13a

38 ± 0.11b

39 ± 0.22b

29 ± 0.21c

S

Carcass

1070 ± 0.14a

798 ±0.20b

726 ±0.03c

568 ±0.23d

S

Internal body fat tissue

8 ±0.19a

4 ±0.38b

3 ±0.38c

2.00 ± 0.53d

S

Means with difference superscripts in the same row differ significantly (p <0.05)


This significant difference in average liver weights was also observed among the trials.  However,  liver of T3 had the highest average weights that might be due to its involvement in COC digestion and metabolism. Other organs (legs and Vesira), carcass, internal body fat tissues showed significant differences across the dietary treatments. Moreover, percentages of carcass/ body weight at the slaughtering age
were 47.7, 44.5, 41.3 and 21 for C, T1, T2, and T3 trials, respectively. The slight difference in these values between C and T1or T2 indicated that T1 and T2 rabbits were very acceptable for marketing and slaughtering. Nevertheless, in general, partial COC feed succeeded in decreasing average of organs weights and average of internal body fat tissues weights of the rabbits. In contrast, 40 % RPA diet and ad-libitum COC succeeded to increase average of liver weights of the rabbits.  
 

 

Conclusion

 


Recommendations

In the Gaza strip, nowadays, rabbit farms undergo from deficiency of high expensive commercial concentrated feeds such as RPA that are usually imported from Israel and not made in the Gaza Strip.  Therefore, rabbit farmers are looking for alternative feeds. The present study was a case-control and gave an indication that growing rabbits can tolerate COC as a partial feed of RPA diet under unavoidable conditions. It recommends studying the effect of partial COC feed on reproductive performances of domesticated rabbits. It also recommends carrying out histological studies of some organs particularly liver of the growing rabbits partially fed COC.
 

Acknowledgement

I would like to express my deepest appreciation to Mr. Khalil N.  Abu-Shammalah, M.Sc. in animal nutrition, El-Zwadia Town, Mid-Zone Governorate, Gaza and Dr. Ibraheem  Alqedra, Assistant Prof. in animal nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture, Gaza, for their help in carrying out the experimental part.

 

I would also like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to the Deanery of research at IUG for supporting financially this study, and to the General Economic Consumer Establishment Center, El-Sakhra, Gaza for providing us the growing rabbits.

 

References

Amaefule, KU, Iheukwumere F C, and Nwaokoro C C 2005 A note on Growth performance and carcass characteristics of rabbits fed grated dietary levels of boiled pigeon pea seed (Cajanus Cajan). Livestock Research for Rural Development 17 (5) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/5/amae17048.htm

 

El-Shawa S 1988 Recent trends in raising rabbits. Al-Haya Al-Khayrya Press, Gaza, Palestine.

 

Felker P 1995 Forage and fodder production and utilization. In: Barbara G, Inglese P and Pimienta-Barrios P (Editors). Agro-ecology, Utilization and uses of cactus Pear, FAO Plant Production and Protection paper: 132

 

González C L 1989 Potential of fertilization to improve nutritive value of prickly pear cactus. Journal of Arid Environments 16: 87-94

 

Gregory R A and Felker P 1992 Crude protein and phosphorous content of eight contrasting opuntia forge clones. Journal of Arid Environments 22: 323-331

 

Handa M C, Sapra K T and Shingai B K 1995 Rabbits for meat production. Asian Livestock 20: 99-100.

 

Hoffman M T, James C D, Kerley G I H and Whitford W G 1993  Rabbit herbivory and its effect on cladode, flower and fruit production of  opuntia  violacea var macrocentra (cactaceae) in the northern Chihuahuan desert , New Mexico . The Southwestern Naturalist 38 (4): 309-315

 

Jones N D 1990 The developing market for farm–bred meat rabbits in Britain.

 

McDonald P E, Edwards R A, Greenhalgh J F D and Morgan C A 1995 Animal Nutrition. 5th edition. New York: Longman: 607

 

Mbanya J N, Ndoping B N,  Mafeni J M, Fomunyam D W 2005 The effect of different protein sources and their combination on the performance of growing rabbits in tropical conditions. Livestock Research for Rural Development 17(3). http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/3/mban17032.htm

 

Nefzaoui A 1995 Nutritive value of spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica var. inermis) and Atriplex nummularia based-diets. IVth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores–Satellite "Ruminant use of fodder resources in warm climate countries", Montpellier, France.

 

Nefzaoui A and Ben Salem H 2005 Opuntia: A strategic fodder and efficient tool to combat desertification in the Wana region. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Tunisie, Tunisia http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2808E/y2808e0d.htm

 

Nobel P S 1995 Environmental biology. p.36-48, in: G. Barbera, P. Inglese and E. Pimienta-Barrios (editors) Agro-ecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper: 132

 

Onimisi P A and Omage J  J 2006 Evaluation of poultry Litter as feedstuff for growing rabbits.   http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/11/onim18163.htm

 

Orunmuyi M, Bawa G S, Adeyinka F D, Daudu O M, and Adeyinka I A 2006 Effects of Grated levels of palm-kernal cake on performance of grower rabbits. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 5(1): 71-74.

 

Retamal N, Duran J M, and Fernandez J 1987 Ethanol production by fermentation of fruits and cladodes of prickly pear cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller). Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 40(3): 213-218.

 

Rahim A, Reza A and Shahjalat 1997 Comparative study of a soybean meal and whole gram on growth and reproduction performances of rabbits. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Sciences 26: 89-97

 

Roy J, Sultana N, Khondoker Z, Reza A, and Hossain S M J 2002 Effect of different Sources of protein on growth and reproduction performance of rabbits. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 1(6): 279-281

 

Ruiz–Feria, C A, Lukefahr  S D, and Felker P 1998 Evaluation of Leucaena leucocephala and catus as forages for growing rabbits. Livestock research for Rural Development.   http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd10/2/luke102.htm

 

Ruiz-Feria C A, Lukefahr S D, Pro M A, Becerril C P, and Felker P 1996 Cactus (Opuntia stricta) and mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa var. glandulosa) as forage resources for growing rabbits in semi-arid, subtropical south Texas. In: Proc 6th World Rabbit Congress, Toulouse, France 3: 257-261

 

Russel C and Felker P 1987 Comparative cold hardiness of Opuntia sp. and cvs grown for fruit, vegetable, and fodder production. Journal of Horticultural Science 62: 545-550



Received 5 August 2007; Accepted 17 August 2007; Published 5 October 2007

Go to top