This study was carried out to investigate the productivity
and the natural disease resistance potential of free-ranging local chickens in
Average body weight for hens and
cocks was 1441g (800 to 2,300g) and 2261g (1000 to 3500g), respectively. Egg
weight averaged 41.6g (27 to 72g). Mean body length for hens and cocks was
21.6cm (17 to 26cm) and 24.6cm (21 to 29cm), respectively, and mean shank
length 9.7cm (7 to 12cm) and 12.7cm (8.5 to 15cm), respectively. Between
ecotypes significant differences were seen in the above parameters. The disease
resistance potential was tested on 10 offspring of each ecotype, excluding the Mbeya. Twenty chickens (five from each of the four
ecotypes) aged 12 weeks were inoculated with Newcastle disease virus while
another 20 aged 20 weeks were inoculated with Salmonella gallinarum. Five chickens per
group that were not challenged were used as controls. Following oral, ocular and
nasal drop inoculation with
It was concluded that
free-ranging local chicken ecotypes in
Free-ranging local chickens
account for most of the 27.8 million poultry kept in
Free-ranging local chickens are known for their ability to survive under various types of shelter, including makeshift chicken houses, kitchens and even roosting in trees (Andrews 1990; Horst 1990; Musharaf 1990; Yongolo 1996).
Breeding under the free-ranging system of management is random, and cocks and hens mate in an uncontrolled manner (Horst 1990; Williams 1990). It is usually the most aggressive, strong and dominant cock, which sires most offspring in the neighbourhood (Williams 1990).
Considerable variations in adult
body weight, anatomical features, body size, egg weight and production capacity
and plumage characteristics have been reported among the free-ranging local
chickens in
The major production constraint
in free-ranging local chickens in developing countries is disease (Mitchell
1984; Minga et al 1989; Sonaiya
1990; Awan et al 1994).
Local chickens are believed to be resistant to many common diseases, partly because little attention is paid to disease control measures (Melewas 1989; Kulube 1990; Chrysostome et al 1995). However, other studies have shown that local chickens appear to be more susceptible to diseases than exotic commercial types (Lin and Lee 1996; Okoye and Aba-Adulugba 1998).
Natural resistance to different Salmonellae infections has been reported in some lines of White Leghorn chickens (Bumstead et al 1989; Bumstead and Barrow 1993) but natural resistance to ND has not been reported. However, so far no work has been done to compare the susceptibility or resistance of the heterogeneous free-ranging local chickens to different diseases.
The current study was undertaken to investigate the potential of the free-ranging local chickens in terms of productivity and natural disease resistance and the possibility of utilising the available potential in the improvement of chickens in this sector.
A
total of 84 adult free-ranging local chickens originating from the five local
ecotypes, namely: Ching’wekwe (n =15), Mbeya (19), Morogoro-medium (19),
Kuchi (16) and Singamagazi
(15) were used (Msoffe et al 2001). The chickens were
used for the assessment of the quantitative parameters, and were the parents of
chicks used in the experimental infection study. The chickens were bought from
villages without history of crossbreeding programmes
involving exotic chickens. The selected chickens were wing tagged,
vaccinated against
Initial body weight (g), body length (cm), shank length (cm) and egg weight (g) were measured in each group separately. A total of 50 randomly selected eggs in each group were weighed.
Each bird received 1ml of the SUA
24/C NDV inoculum (Yongolo
1996) at 106 ELD50. Inoculation was done as ocular and nasal drops,
with one drop on each location on one side of the face, while the remainder of
the inoculum was given orally. Observations for signs
of
Each of the twenty chickens was
inoculated orally with 1 ml of overnight Muller Hinton broth culture of S. gallinarum
(dose 5.2 x 108 cfu). The S. gallinarum
had previously been isolated from a field outbreak of Fowl typhoid in a
Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and linear regression examining the effect of ecotype on the physical parameters were employed (Statistix ® version 4.1). The raw data used in the generation of the data set were for body length, shank length, and adult body weight.
The overall variability in the physical variables studied is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Variations in physical parameters in free ranging
local chickens in |
|||||||
|
Body length |
Shank length |
Body weight |
Egg weight (g) |
|||
|
Female |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
Male |
|
Mean
± SE |
21.6±0.4 |
24.6±0.4 |
9.7±0.2 |
12.7±0.2 |
1471.1±60 |
2261.5±12 |
41.6±0.4 |
Range |
17-26 |
21-29 |
7-12 |
8.5-15 |
800-2300 |
1000-3500 |
27-72 |
When each group was assessed separately for the physical parameters, the results obtained were either above or below the overall average values presented in Table 1 (Tables 2a and 2b). Chickens from Kuchi and Singamagazi ecotypes had mean values for all the four physical parameters measured that were above the overall averages. Chickens from other ecotypes had mean values below or close to the overall averages. Mean egg weights for the Kuchi and Singamagazi ecotypes, respectively, were also above the overall average. The average body weights for females for males from the Morogoro-medium group were below the overall mean values. The lowest values for body length, which were below the overall mean value, were seen in Mbeya females and Mbeya and Morogoro-medium males. The shortest shanks were recorded in chickens of the Ching’wekwe ecotype.
Table 2a. Variations in physical parameters in free-ranging
local chickens according to ecotype (males) |
|||
Ecotype* |
Body
length (cm) |
Shank
length (cm) |
Body
weight (g) |
Mbeya n
=6 Range |
23±0.3 21.5-24 |
12.4±0.2 11-13 |
1621±184 1040-2500 |
MG-1
n =7 Range |
24.2±0.8 21-26 |
12±0.3 11-13 |
1850±181 1000-2350 |
Ching
n=3 Range |
23.3±1.4 21-26 |
10±0.8 8.5-11 |
2100±202 1850-2500 |
Kuchi
=6 Range |
25.2±0.9 22-29 |
13.3±0.5 12-15 |
2708±157 2300-3300 |
Singa
=10 Range |
26.4±0.4 24-28 |
13.9±0.3 12.5-15 |
2915±115 2250-3500 |
*MG-1 = the Morogoro-medium ecotype; Singa
= the Singamagazi ecotype; Ching
= Ching’wekwe ecotype |
Table 2b. Variations in physical parameters in free-ranging
local chickens according to ecotype (females) |
||||
Ecotype* |
Body length |
Shank
length |
Body
weight |
Egg weight |
Mbeya n
=8 Range |
20.2±0.8 17-24 |
10.2±0.4 9.5-12.5 |
1394±148 850-2050 |
41.1±1 27.2-60.1 |
MG-1
n =13 Range |
21.1±0.3 19-23 |
9.7±0.1 9-10.5 |
1108±60.4 800-1600 |
38.3±0.5 31.7-46.9 |
Ching
n=12 Range |
21.4±0.3 20-23 |
8.2±0.2 7. -9.5 |
1442±71.2 1050-1900 |
37.6±0.6 29.7-58.6 |
Kuchi=9 Range |
23.7±0.5 22-26 |
10.7±0.2 9.5-12 |
1828±81.7 1500-2300 |
45.1±0.8 38.4-72 |
Singa=5 Range |
22.4±0.4 21-23 |
10.9±0.3 10-11.5 |
2020±80 1850-2250 |
45.6±0.4 37.6-51.5 |
* MG-1 = the Morogoro-medium
ecotype; Singa = the Singamagazi
ecotype; Ching = Ching’wekwe
ecotype. |
By day three after infection with
NDV, six out of the 20 infected chickens showed clinical signs
of ND, including depression, huddling, ruffling of feathers and reluctance to
move. By day four after infection, all the infected chickens were sick and
apart from the above symptoms, had greenish diarrhoea,
oedema of the face and various degrees of nervous
disorders. The facial oedema was visible only on the
inoculated side. The nervous signs included torticolis,
paresis of limbs, turning in circles and resting on the beak. Mortalities started from day five
after infection and by day seven only one chicken was alive,
but showed severe nervous signs. Although the remaining chicken survived
the challenge it remained lame and was sacrificed on day fourteen after
infection. At necropsy the dead birds appeared
From the third day after
infection most birds infected with S. gallinarum showed some clinical signs of fowl typhoid.
The symptoms were depression, reluctance to move, and various degrees of inappetance, listlessness, yellowish diarrhoea
and standing with closed eyes. The clinical signs were noted in the chickens of
the light ecotypes (Ching’wekwe Morogoro-medium)
and of the heavy ecotypes, Singamagazi but not Kuchi. Mortalities started on the
seventh day after infection, when four chickens were found dead (two of the Singamagazi ecotype and one each from the Ching’wekwe and Morogoro-medium
ecotypes). By day twelve after infection, thirteen chickens had died, while the
remaining seven survived the challenge to the end. The survivors belonged to
the Kuchi
ecotype (all five), Morogoro-medium (one) and Ching’wekwe
(one), while none of Singamagazi
ecotype survived. At necropsy the picture was that of acute
and sub-acute fowl typhoid. At post-mortem examination the carcasses were septicaemic, with
Attempts to re-isolate the organism from livers and spleens of the dead birds using Brilliant Green Agar (BGA) yielded pure colonies of S. gallinarum. However, re-isolation and determination of viable counts of S. gallinarum in the liver and spleen of the survivors 14 days after infection did not yield any bacteria. In spite of this, with pre-enrichment in peptone water before culturing in Selenite-F broth and BGA it was possible to isolate S. gallinarum from three out of the seven sacrificed birds.
The results of the current study
suggest a potential in both productivity and disease resistance traits in the
free-ranging local chicken populations of
However, when these results are
presented with respect to the ecotype of the chickens the differences became
clearer and the ranges were less wide. Egg weights of local Tanzanian
chickens averaging 41.4g (30 to 55g) reported by Minga
(1989) are in agreement with the current average of 41.6g (27 to 72g). However,
the ranges are not similar, which may be due to the inclusion in the current
study of chickens from different ecological regions. French (1942) reported egg
weights averaging 38g in most local chickens, but also that a few chickens
produced eggs weighing 45 to 56g. Egg weight in Nigerian
local chickens were reported to average 38.6g (Omeje
and Nwonsu 1984). In
In terms of body weight, averages of 1471g (800 to 2300g) for females and 2261g (1000 to 3500g) for males were recorded in the current investigation. Previous reports have shown average weights of 1200g for hens and 2200g for cocks (Minga et al 1989), 1651g for hens (Katule 1988) and 1191g for hens (Abdou and Kolstad 1984). The results from these reports are comparable to some results in the current study, especially those of chickens from Mbeya and Morogoro. However, chickens from Kuchi and Singamagazi ecotypes had average weights well above those given in the above reports, and were higher than all the average weights reviewed by Gueye (1998).
There is a general consensus among many
authors that the local chicken industries in the developing world should be
developed as a sustainable alternative to the industrialised production (Sonaiya 1990; Bell, 1992; Mukherjee
1992; Gueye 1998). Still, it is important that before
embarking on projects aimed at increasing the productivity of local chicken
stocks, their current potential should be known (
The current investigation has provided insights into some of the differences within free- ranging local chickens in Tanzania from different geographical locations. This was somehow missing in previous studies and it is now more appropriate to utilise suggestions put forward by Katule (1988; 1990) on the improvement of productivity through crossbreeding. It can be argued that crossing heavy local ecotypes with meat types to achieve a meat-type cross will be more sensible than if a light local ecotype was used, and the same applies for improving egg weights and number. French (1942) saw room for improving the productivity of free-ranging local chickens in Tanzania way back in 1942; today, over fifty years later, we see that the potential is still there, and is probably greater, as more facts are known today about these chickens than at that time. Based on the results of the current investigation, crossbreeding can even be performed between the different local chicken ecotypes, owing to the clear differences observed between them.
In terms of natural disease
resistance potential, our study indicates that the four free-ranging local
chicken (SLC) ecotypes were all susceptible to Newcastle disease (ND). The
clinical signs, mortality and necropsy picture presented by the infected birds
confirmed this. These results agree with the study of Alexander (1997), who
reported the lack of breed or genetically determined susceptibility to ND. The
results of this study also concur with other authors who reported that ND was
the number one killer of the free ranging local chickens in
The current investigation has shown that chickens of the Kuchi ecotype are resistant to Fowl typhoid, as all five chickens from this group survived the challenge without any visible clinical signs of the disease. The other two chickens (one each from Morogoro-medium and Ching’wekwe ecotypes) that also survived the challenge indicate that resistance to Fowl typhoid may be a trait among the free ranging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania. These results are in agreement with work by Bumstead and Barrow (1993), who reported genetic resistance to Fowl typhoid in lines of White Leghorn chickens. It is likely that the differences observed in this experiment on resistance to Fowl typhoid between ecotypes are genetically determined.
The chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex (B complex) is one genetic system, which has been shown to control genetic disease resistance (Bacon 1987). Resistance to Marek’s disease by B21 haplotypes, Fowl cholera by B1haplotypes and coccidiosis by B3 haplotypes of White Leghorn chickens have been reported (Briles et al 1982; Bacon 1987; Lamont et al 1987; Caron et al 1997). However, according to Bumstead and Barrow (1993), genetic resistance to S. gallinarum is not associated with the B-complex. It has been suggested that genetic resistance to Salmonellosis is due to a better ability of the phagocytic system to contain infection during the initial phase of infection (Bumstead and Barrow 1993). Another mechanism, which influences the resistance of individuals to Salmonellosis, is the so-called Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) (Cellier et al 1996; Gautier et al 1998). Studies have indicated that resistance to Salmonellosis in chickens is linked to NRAMP (JinXin et al 997). The basis and mechanisms by which the Kuchi ecotype has become resistant to Fowl typhoid is yet to be determined. However, it is possible that the NRAMP might have played a major role.
Further work is required in order to ascertain the basis and mechanisms behind the resistance of Kuchi ecotype to Fowl typhoid. Studies of the role of phagocytic cells in clearing Salmonellae infection can be expected to answer some of the questions. The role of NRAMP in the resistance can also provide part of the answers to the question. The possibility of transferring this trait to other chickens should also be considered. Further studies on the productivity, adaptability to different ecological zones and resistance to various diseases of the five identified ecotypes is required. However, the search for more ecotypes should continue. Genetic methods of characterisation such as MHC typing, microsatellite typing and identification of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) should be applied.
The current investigation has
revealed that free-ranging local chickens can attain reasonable body and egg
weights under a zero input free ranging mode of nutrition. Tanzania is among
the poorest countries in the world and is constantly threatened by famine
(World Bank 1996). Shortages of maize, which is staple food for most
Tanzanians, affect the production of commercial poultry feeds (maize being the
major ingredient). The free-ranging local chicken sector can therefore provide a
sustainable means of provision of much-needed animal protein at a minimum cost.
Efforts to identify ecotypes showing high productivity and resistance to the
major chicken diseases such as
DANIDA under the ENRECA project
“Improving Health and Productivity of Rural Chickens in
Abdou F H and Kolstad N 1984 A study
on the performance of Norwegian and Egyptian breeds of laying hens and their
crosses. In: Proceedings of 17th World’s Poultry
Alexander D
J 1997
Andrews P
1990
Rural poultry development in the
Awan
M A, Otte
M J and James A D 1994
The Epidemiology of
Bacon L
D 1987 Influence of the Major Histocompatibility
Complex on disease resistance and productivity. Poultry Science 66:802-811
Bell J
G 1992 The
village chicken and disease control.
Briles W E, Briles R W, Pollock D L and Pattison M 1982 Marek's Disease resistance of B MHC) heterozygotes in a cross of pure-bred Leghorn Lines. Poultry Science 61:205-211
Bumstead N and Barrow P A 1993 Resistance to Salmonella gallinarum, S. pullorum and S. enteritidis in inbred lines of chicken. Avian Diseases. 37:189-193
Bumstead N, Huggins M B and
Cook J K A 1989 Genetic differences in susceptibility to
a mixture of avian infectious bronchitis and Escherichia coli. British
Poultry Science 30:39-48
Caron L
A, Abplanalp H
and Taylor R L J 1997 Resistance, Susceptibility and Immunity to Eimeria tenella in Major Histocompatibility (B) complex
Cellier M, Belouchi A and Gross P 1996 Resistance to intracellular infections: comparative genomic analysis of Nramp. Trends in Genetics 12:201-204
Chrysostome C A A M, Bell J G, Demey F and Verhulst A 1995 Seroprevalencies to three diseases in village chickens in Benin. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 22: 257-261
Cole R
K and Hutt F B
1961 Genetic
difference in resistance to
El Zubeir E F A 1990 Smallholder Rural Poultry Production in the
French M
A 1942 The productivity of native poultry. East African Agricultural Journal, 7:175
Gautier A V, Lantier I and Lantier F 1998 Mouse susceptibility to infection by Salmonella abortusovis vaccine strain Rv6 is controlled by the Ity/Nramp 1 gene influences the antibody but not the haemolytic complement responses. Microbial Pathogenesis. 24 (1): 47-55
Gueye E F 1998 Village egg and fowl meat production in
Horst P 1990 Research and development perspectives. In: Horst P 1990 Research and development perspectives. In: CTA-Seminar Proceedings: Smallholder Rural Poultry Production. Riest U (Ed ) Thessaloniki-Greece 9-13 October 1:61-69
JinXin H, Bumstead N, Barrow P, Sebastian G, Olien L, Morgan K, Malo D and Hu JX 1997 Resistance to Salmonellosis in the chicken is linked to NRAMP1 and TNC. Genome Research, 7 (7): 693-704
Jull M
A 1951 Poultry husbandry, 3rd Edition,
McGraw-Hill Book Company,
Kabatange M A and Katule A M 1989 Rural poultry production systems in
Katule A M 1990 Studies on the prospects of improving the performance of local chicken populations in Tazania by crossbreeding. PhD thesis, SUA, Morogoro
Katule A M 1988 Crossbreeding as a tool for genetic
improvement of chickens in less optimum environments. In: Proceedings of the 15th Scientific Conference of the
Kulube K 1990 Smallholder poultry production in
Lamont S J, Bolin C and Cheville N 1987 Genetic resistance to fowl cholera is linked to the Major Histocompatibility Complex. Immunogenetics 25, 284-289
Lawrence P
1998 Ecotypes and natural disease resistance among
scavenging local chickens of
Lin J
A and Lee T-S 1996 Genetic susceptibility to Marek’s
Disease Virus of local chickens in
Mdegela R H, Yongolo M G S, Minga U M and Olsen J E 2000 Molecular epidemiology of Salmonella gallinarum in chickens in Tanzania. Avian Pathology 29: (5) 457-463
Melewas J N 1989 The Contribution of the poultry industry to
the national economy. In: The Proceedings
of the 7th
Minga U.M.; Katule, A M; Maeda T and Musasa J 1989 Potential of the traditional chicken industry in
Mitchell D
F 1984 Incidence and control of poultry diseases in
central and south
MOA 1995 National sample census of
agriculture 1994/1995;
Msanga J F and Tungaraza R 1985
The incidence of external and internal parasites of the indigenous poultry in Mwanza municipality,
Msoffe P L M, Minga U M, Olsen J E, Yongolo M G S, Juul-Madsen H R, Gwakisa P S and Mtambo M M A 2001 Phenotypes including immunocompetence in free ranging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health and Production 33(4): 341-354
Mukherjee T K 1992 Usefulness of indigenous breeds and imported
stocks for poultry for poultry production in hot climates. In: Proceedings of
the 19th world poultry
Musharaf N A 1990 Rural Poultry Production in
Mwasha P S 1991 The role of scavenging animals in the developing countries. In: TSAP proceedings 18: pp 212-222
Okoye J O A and Aba-Adulugba E P 1998 Comparative study of the resistance or susceptibility of local Nigerian and exotic chickens. Avian Pathology, 27: 168-173
Oluyemi J A and Roberts F A 1979 In: Poultry
production in warm and wet climates. Edited by Oluyemi J A and Roberts F A. The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Omeje S S and Nwosu C C 1984 Modes of inheritance and inter relationships
of age and body weight at first egg and other short term production parameters
in local and exotic cross-bred chickens. In: Proceedings of 17th
Poultry
Permin A, Magwisha H and Kassuku A A, Nansen P, Bisgaard M, Frandsen F and
Gibbons L 1997 A
cross-sectional study of helminths in rural
scavenging poultry in Tanzania in relation to season and climate. Journal of Helminthology
73: 233-240
Sonaiya E B 1990 The
context and prospects for development of smallholder rural poultry production
in
Trail J
C M 1963 The indigenous poultry. 2. Egg production. Empire Journal of
Experimental Agriculture. 31: 323-326
Williams G E S 1990 Smallholder rural poultry production in
World Bank 1996
Wray C, Davies R H and
Corkish J D 1996 Enterobacteriaceae, In: Poultry Diseases 4th Edn Jordan F T W and Pattison M (Eds ) Saunders Company Ltd. London.
Yongolo M G S 1996 Epidemiology of Newcastle disease in village
chickens in
Yongolo M G S, Minga U M, Maeda-Machang'u A D, Matovelo J A and
Mwanjala T K 1996 Infectious Bursal
Disease and Dispharynx nasuta
in village chickens.
Received 9 March 2002