Livestock Research for Rural Development 19 (7) 2007 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
An experiment on weaners of large white Yorkshire breed of pigs was conducted to study the effect of replacing maize with paddy on the growth performance digestibility and carcass traits. Twenty piglets of 2½ months age of similar body weight were grouped in four groups containing three male and two female piglets in each. All the animals were housed in individual pens. A control and three experimental diets PR40, PR50 and PR60 containing 40, 50 and 60 per cent paddy respectively were formulated. The replacement of maize was done on w/w basis. The experimental diets were randomly allocated to four groups. Ad libitum feeding was done individually for a total period of 154 days.
Body weight and average daily gains were not affected during growing phase, however, during finishing phase the effect was significant (P £ 0.05). Both feed consumption and feed conversion ratio were significantly (P £ 0.05) affected with the addition of paddy in both growing and finishing phases. The digestibility coefficient of organic matter and crude fibre significantly (P £ 0.05) reduced with the addition of paddy in the diets. The reducing effect was more pronounced (P £ 0.05) for digestibility of dry matter, crude protein and nitrogen free extract. Significant (P £ 0.05) effect of replacing maize with paddy on loin and belly weights was observed).
From the data it was concluded that growing finishing pigs fed diets with 40 percent paddy showed similar performance as pigs fed control diet containing 50 percent maize.
Key words: Carcass parameters, digestibility, growth, paddy, pig
Major recurring expenditure of pig production is on feed. Maize is the main cereal grain used in the pig diets so as to meet their high energy needs as per BIS (1987) specifications. Wheat, barley, oats, rice kani etc. are the alternatives to maize.
Rice grain (Oryza sativa) along with hulls/husk is known as paddy. Paddy seed contains a rough, hard and woody outer covering, called husk which make paddy as such inedible. Husk must be removed to make the rice easy to cook and digest. Rice milling is the process of removing the husk along with a part of bran from paddy. During milling process several by-products viz. rice polish, rice bran, broken rice are available for use as animal feeds (Figure 1).
|
|
Broken rice or rice kani has lower nutritive value than maize (Sikka 1990). Rice polish is better in nutritive value than rice bran. Generally rice polish and rice bran are mixed together during milling and their mixture is available for feeding to livestock. Rice bran actually is the mixture of pericarp, seed coat and some of aleurone layer but is highly variable in quality with respect to crude fibre contents depending upon the amount of ground husk mixed in it (Ichhponani et al 1980). Quality of rice bran with respect to crude fibre affects the growth rates and digestibility in growing pigs (Sikka and Chawla 1984) and sows (Garg and Pathak 1983). Rice husk contain 35 percent cellulose, 30 percent lignin, 18 percent pentosans and 17 percent ash. Paddy on an average contains7- 8 percent crude protein, 12-14 percent crude fibre, 2 - 3 percent ether extract, 74-75 percent nitrogen free extract, 36 -38 percent available carbohydrates and is a good source of energy for pigs (Sikka 1990). Keeping in view its chemical composition and the adulteration of rice bran with husk, an attempt was made to use paddy as a replacement of maize alone or along with a part of rice bran in the pig grower and finisher diets.
Twenty 2½ months old growing piglets of Large White York Shire (LWY) breed were procured and randomly allotted to four groups. Each group had three males and two females. The grouping was done in a way that all the groups had similar body weight. While grouping it was assured that all the groups had equal number of littermates. Experimental pigs were housed in individual pens (5' x 3' size) with concrete floor provided with separate feeders and waterers.
Paddy from the field was procured and ground. Four experimental diets were formulated (Table 1).
Control Diet: Control diet containing 50 percent maize
PR40: Containing 40 per cent ground paddy
PR50: Containing 50 per cent ground paddy
PR60: Containing 60 per cent ground paddy.
Table 1. Composition of experimental diets (kg / 100 kg) |
||||
Ingredients |
Diets |
|||
Control |
PR 40 |
PR 50 |
PR 60 |
|
Maize |
50 |
10 |
- |
- |
Paddy |
- |
40 |
50 |
60 |
Rice bran |
25 |
25 |
25 |
10 |
Groundnut cake |
16 |
16 |
16 |
20 |
Fish meal |
7 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
Mineral mixture1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Vitamins2 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
+ |
1. Mineral mixture contains 24%, calcium; 9%, phosphorus; 30%, sodium chloride; 0.5%, iron; 0.5%, potassium iodide; 0.8%, copper; 12%, maganese and 0.15%, cobalt. 2. Rovimix K 15 g/Qnt. (Vitamin A, 82500 I.U,; Thiamine, 50 mg; Vitamin D3, 12,000 I.U.; Vitamin K, 10 mg/per g.). |
Each diet was randomly allocated to one of the experimental groups. Feeding was done individually as two meals a day for a total period of 154 days. Growing period lasted for 98 days and finishing phase for 56 days. Daily feed offered to each pig was recorded.
At the end of feeding trial a digestion trial was conducted. During last three consecutive days, known quantity of feed was offered as 4 to 5 meals a day in order to avoid feed wastage. Daily feed consumed by each pig was recorded. Faeces of each pig were collected manually as and when voided. 24 hour faecal material of each pig was mixed thoroughly and dried. The three day dried feaces of each pig was pooled and ground.
Three animals from each treatment were selected and sacrificed (USDA 1970) at the end of feeding trial to study organ development and carcass traits.
Paddy, experimental diets and feaces were analyzed for proximate principles
(AOAC 1990). Data of body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio,
digestibility of nutrients and carcass parameters were subjected to analysis of
variance (Snedecor and Cochran 1968).
The chemical composition of the experimental diets revealed a decrease in crude protein, nitrogen free extract and ether extract contents when maize was replaced with paddy (Table 2).
Table 2. Per cent chemical composition of experimental diets (DM basis) |
||||
Parameter |
Diets |
|||
Control |
PR 40 |
PR 50 |
PR 60 ( |
|
C P |
17.4 |
16.4 |
15.9 |
17.0 |
C F |
8.40 |
9.48 |
10.7 |
11.9 |
E E |
2.08 |
1.88 |
1.76 |
1.60 |
Total Ash |
6.05 |
7.80 |
8.49 |
8.05 |
N F E |
66.1 |
64.4 |
63.2 |
61.5 |
ME, Mcal/Kg |
3.10 |
2.76 |
2.68 |
2.68 |
However in thePR60 diet, the protein content was more as compared to diets PR40 and PR50 as a result of increase in the level of groundnut cake and fishmeal in PR60 diet (Table 1). Replacement of maize with paddy increased the crude fibre and total ash contents of the diets (Table 2). Chemical analysis further revealed higher protein content of the control diet than in other diets can be attributed to the differences in the protein content of maize and the ground paddy used to formulate the diets.
The dietary treatments had no effect on the body weight and weight gain of the pigs during the growing phase (Table 3) however significant (P £ 0.05) increase in feed intake was observed.
Table 3. Effect of feeding different levels of paddy on the growth performance of growing pigs. |
|||||
Parameter |
Diets |
||||
Control |
PR 40 |
PR 50 |
PR 60 |
SEM |
|
Initial weight, kg |
10.4 +1.38 |
10.4+ 1.78 |
10.4+1.54 |
10.4+1.44 |
2.1 |
Final weight, kg |
44.6+ 5.94 |
43.8+ 4.20 |
44.7 +1.53 |
44.8 +2.88 |
3.7 |
Total weight gain, kg |
34.2 +3.02 |
33.4 +2.90 |
34.3 +2.02 |
34.4 +3.01 |
2.8 |
Weight gain,g/h/d |
349 +2.22 |
341 +14 |
350 +7.75 |
351+8.54 |
36 |
Feed intake, g/h/d |
1273a+91 |
1287a+45 |
1398b+68 |
1333ab+15 |
69 |
FCR |
3.65a+0.05 |
3.77b+0.05 |
3.99c+0.06 |
3.80b+0.03 |
0.17 |
Figures with different superscripts in each row differ significantly (P£ 0.05). |
The feed consumption per animal per day in pigs fed PR50 diet containing 50 per cent paddy was comparable to diet PR 60 but significantly (P£ 0.05) more than control and PR40 diets. Higher feed consumption in pigs receiving diet PR50 and PR60 than that receiving control and diet PR40 can be explained on the basis of low energy content of these diets due to higher crude fibre content (Table 3). It was further observed that feed conversion ratio (FCR) was significantly (P£ 0.05) deteriorated when paddy replaced maize. Significantly (P£ 0.05) better feed conversion ratio in pigs receiving PR60 than PR50 can be explained on the basis of higher protein content with better quality due to the higher contents of both groundnut cake and fish meal. Sikka et al (1987) observed improvement in daily gain with better feed conversion ratio in growing pigs when protein level of the diets was increased. The increase in the feed consumption and deterioration in the FCR in paddy containing diets can be attributed to the low energy content of these diets (Table 2) due to higher crude fibre level in these diets as compared to control diet. Moreover a negative relationship exists between the energy and dietary crude fibre content (Sikka 1990). Bhar et al (2001) reported reduction in feed consumption along with deterioration in FCR due to increase in crude fibre as a result of increase in rice bran of the diet.
During the latter phase of growth, replacement of maize with paddy significantly (P £ 0.05) reduced the body weight and weight gain of the pigs (Table 4).
Table 4. Effect of feeding different levels of paddy on the growth performance of finishing pigs |
|||||
Parameter |
Diets |
SEM |
|||
Control |
PR 40 |
PR 50 |
PR 60 |
||
Final weight, kg |
68.7a + 5.57 |
67.2a + 6.36 |
63.60b + 2.95 |
63.2b + 3.59 |
5.0 |
Total weight gain, kg |
24.1a + 1.38 |
23.4a + 2.63 |
18.90b + 2.07 |
18.4b + 2.22 |
2.9 |
Weight gain, g/h/d ** |
446a + 25.8 |
433a + 48.7 |
350b + 44.0 |
341b + 48.4 |
58.8 |
Feed intake, g/h/d |
2135 + 15 |
2115 + 11 |
2115 + 9 |
2135 + 8 |
10.5 |
FCR* |
4.79a + 0.04 |
4.88a + 0.02 |
6.04b + 0.05 |
6.26b + 0.04 |
0.61 |
Figures with different superscripts in each
row differ significantly. *Differ significantly (P£0.05), |
Eighty per cent replacement of maize with paddy (PR40 diet) had no significant (P £ 0.05) effect in reducing the weight gain and feed consumption (Table 4). Increasing the paddy level to 50 or 60 percent in the diet significantly (P £ 0.05) reduced both the body weight and daily weight gain in pigs. The feed conversion ratio in pigs fed diets PR50 and PR60was significantly (P £ 0.05) poor than in pigs fed control and PR40 diets (Table 4). Sikka and Chawla (1986) earlier reported reduction in weight gain with poor FCR in finishing pigs with the increase in the level of dietary crude fibre. Soren et al (2003) also observed reduction in daily weight gain and deterioration in feed gain ratio in gilts when they increased the dietary fibre by adding rice bran in the diets.
Digestibility of organic matter, dry matter and nitrogen free extract was significantly (P £ 0.05) less in PR50 and PR60 diets than in control and PR40 diets (Table 5).
Table 5. Effect of different level of paddy on the nutrient digestibility |
|||||
Parameter |
Diets |
|
|||
Control |
PR 40 |
PR 50 |
PR 60 |
SEM |
|
O M * |
80.43a |
80.31a |
67.56b |
69.19b |
6.49 |
D M ** |
75.9a |
77.13a |
62.7b |
62.4b |
7.7 |
C P ** |
74.47a |
74.62a |
58.01c |
64.02b |
7.45 |
C F * |
30.33 ab |
36.74c |
34.35bc |
29.09a |
4.38 |
EE ** |
69.87a |
68.47a |
74.01b |
79.86c |
4.78 |
N F E ** |
88.34b |
87.21b |
81.18a |
85.30a |
3.0 |
* Differ significantly (P £ 0.05) ** Differ significantly (P £ 0.01) |
The crude protein digestibility in PR60 diet was significantly (P£ 0.01) less than the control and PR40 diet but significantly (P £ 0.01) more than PR50 diet. The increase in the protein digestibility in pigs fed PR60 diet than PR50 diet can be attributed to the better protein quality and higher protein level in it. Sikka et al (1981) reported an increase in the protein digestibility in growing pigs with increase in the dietary protein level. Crude fibre digestibility in pigs fed PR60 diet was comparable to control diet but significantly (P£ 0.05) less than PR40 and PR50 diets. Crude fibre digestibility in control and PR50; PR40 and PR50 were comparable. Hundred per cent replacement of maize with paddy significantly (P£ 0.05) increased the ether extract digestibility as compared to control and PR40 diets (Table 5). It was further observed that ether extract digestibility in pigs receiving PR60 diet was significantly (P£ 0.05) more than the pigs receiving PR50 diet. Garg and Pathak (1983) also observed similar findings when they increased the dietary crude fibre by adding rice bran in the sow diets.
Better utilisation of nutrients in the control diet than in the other diets can be explained on the basis of higher protein contents and low fibre content in it than other diets. Poor digestibility of nutrients in paddy containing diets can be attributed to the higher crude fibre in these diets (Table 2) which had negative relationship with the digestibility of nutrients in pigs (Sikka et al 1985). The other probable reasons for poor digestibility can be attributed to the protective influence of crude fibre against the digestion of all the nutrients, the gel forming properties of poly saccharides (Murray 1976) and the faster rate of passage of the digesta through the G - 1- tract (Laplace 1975; Kass et al 1980).
Dietary treatments had no significant (P£ 0.05) effect on dressing per cent, per cent drift, carcass length and back fat thickness of the pigs (table 6).
Table 6. Effect of different level of paddy on the carcass parameters |
|||||
Parameter |
Diets |
SEM |
|||
Control |
PR 40 |
PR 50 |
PR 60 |
||
Dressing per cent |
69.2 |
68.42 |
69.34 |
68.34 |
2.92 |
Per cent drift |
3.42 |
3.75 |
4.83 |
4.50 |
1.10 |
Carcass length, cm |
75 |
76 |
73 |
75 |
3.16 |
Back fat thickness, cm |
2.75 |
2.50 |
2.25 |
1.92 |
0.40 |
Loin eye muscle area |
40.37 |
35.27 |
34.50 |
40.62 |
2.10 |
Primal cuts, % HCW |
|||||
Ham |
23.22 |
25.72 |
21.46 |
22.84 |
2.40 |
Shoulder |
15.20 |
16.08 |
15.01 |
15.55 |
2.11 |
Loin |
11.76a |
12.55ab |
11.37a |
15.98b |
1.98 |
Belly weight |
7.63a |
7.58a |
7.98a |
9.87b |
1.0 |
Figures with different superscripts in each row differed significantly (P£ 0.05) HCW: hot carcass weight |
It
was observed that the average back fat thickness reduced linearly with the
increase in the level of paddy in the diet. Reduction in the average back fat
thickness with increase in dietary crude fibre is in agreement with the earlier
reports of Sikka et al (1985) and Sikka and Chawla (1986). Loin eye muscle area
also reduced with the replacement of maize. The loin eye muscle area of pigs fed
PR60 diet was comparable with control group but more than in pigs fed PR40 and
PR50 diets probably due to more and better quality proteins available to the
pigs fed PR60 diet. Among the various primal cuts the dietary treatments
significantly (P£ 0.05) affected the loin and belly weights. Pigs fed PR60 diet
had comparable loin weight with pigs fed PR40 diet but significantly (P£ 0.05)
more than other dietary treatments. The belly weight of pigs fed control, PR40
and PR50 diets were comparable to each but significantly less than in pigs fed
PR60 diet (Table 6). From the data it was concluded that growing finishing pigs
fed diets with 40 percent paddy showed similar performance as pigs fed control
diet containing 50 percent maize.
AOAC 1990 Official methods of analysis (15th Edition). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington Virginia.
Bhar R, Pathak N N and Satya Paul 2001 Performance of crossbred (Landrance x local Indian) grower pigs on maize replaced wheat bran and rice bran based diets. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 71: (2):165 -168.
BIS 1987 Indian standard specifications for pig feeds. IS: 7472 - 1986. Bureau of Indian Standards. Manak Bhawan, 9, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, New Delhi - 110002.
Ichhponani J S, Arora B S and Zambade S S 1980 Economics of feeding de oiled rice bran to poultry. Poultry Guide XVII (4):21-24.
Garg A K and Pathak N N 1983 Studies on feeding of grain-less ration to Landrace sows. Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 26 (2) 202-206
Kass M L, Van Soest P J, Pond WG, Lewis B and Mc Dowell R E 1980 Utilization of dietary fibre from alfalfa by growing pigs. 1. Apparent digestibility of diet components in G-I-traits. Journal of Animal Science 50: 175-91.
Laplace J P 1975 Le transit digestif chez les monogastrigues. 2. Phénomènes. Moteurs et. Mouvements des digesta. Annales de Zootechnie 24 : 489-552.
Murray A G 1976 The effect of fibre in the form of various polysaccharides on the apparent digestibility of proteins in the pigs. Thesis Aberdeen cf Laplace and Lebas 1981.
Sikka S S 1990 Comparative utilisation nutrient in poultry and swine. Ph.D. Dissertation submitted to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Sikka S S and Chawla J S 1984 Effect of quality of rice bran on the performance of growing pigs. Journal of Research of Punjab Agricultural University 21:(3): 457-59
Sikka S S and Chawla J S 1986 Effect of feeding spent coffee grounds on the feedlot performance and carcass quality of fattening pigs. Agricultural Wastes 18: 305-308
Sikka S S, Chawla J S and Ichhponani J S 1981 Effect of the level of protein on the nutrient utilization by growing pigs. Journal of Research of Punjab Agricultural University 18: (2) 188-91.
Sikka S S, Chawla, J S and Ichhponani, J S 1985 Effect of feeding ground spent coffee on the growth and carcass quality of pigs. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 2 (1): 49-52.
Sikka S S, Chawla J S and Ichhponani J S 1987 Effect of protein level on the performance of growing pigs during different seasons. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 57: 164-167
Snedecor GW and Cochran WG 1968 Statistical Methods. 8th edition, Oxford and IBH publishing Co., Kolkata.
Soren N M, Bhar R, Chabbra A K and Mandal A B 2003 Performance of crossbred gilts fed on diets with higher levels of fat and fibre through addition of rice bran. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 16:11: 1650-55.
USDA 1970 Slaughtering cutting and processing of pork on the farm. Farmers' Bulletin NO. 2138 United States Department of Agriculture.
Received 9 June 2006; Accepted 8 June 2007; Published 6 July 2007