Livestock Research for Rural Development 15 (2) 2003 | Citation of this paper |
Cassia rotundifolia (Cassia), Lablab purpureus (Lablab) and Macroptilium atropurpureum (Siratro) were harvested at 8, 14 and 20 weeks of growth and either sun- or oven-dried prior to evaluation by the in sacco technique using three rumen fistulated Friesian steers. The samples were incubated for 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h.
After oven-drying the three legumes had similar quickly degradable dry matter contents at each of the growth stages. However, after sun-drying, cassia and lablab had a higher quickly degradable dry matter content than siratro. The quickly degradable dry matter content of the forages declined with increasing maturity, irrespective of drying method. For the slowly degradable fraction of the dry matter, the rate of degradation was greater for siratro, 0.08/h, than either cassia or lablab that were similar (0.05/h). Sun-dried forages harvested at 14 and 20 weeks of growth had greater potentially degradable dry matter content than oven-dried forages. At all stages of growth and irrespective of drying method, the proportions of potentially degradable dry matter were highest for lablab followed by cassia then siratro.
It is concluded that oven-drying reduced
the in sacco dry matter degradability of
siratro, cassia and lablab forages compared with sun-drying.
The rumen degradation characteristics of a feed can be a guide to it's nutritive value for ruminants. The potential degradability is indicative of overall digestibility while the rate of degradation can be a guide to the extent that digestible dietary nutrients escape the rumen fermentation. The extent to which a forage is degraded in the rumen depends on many factors, among which are stage of maturity, presence of tannins, microbial proteolytic activity and rumen retention time (Stern et al 1994; Hadjipanayiotou et al 1996). In the tropics, sun-drying is often used by farmers as a method of conserving protein-rich forages. However, there is little information on the effect of drying method and it's possible interaction with stage of maturity, on the nutritive value of forages. It was therefore considered appropriate to determine the effects on chemical composition and rumen degradability of three herbaceous legumes of sun-drying compared with oven-drying, as practiced in the laboratory.
The chosen legumes were: Cassia
rotundifolia (Cassia), Lablab purpureus
(Lablab) and Macroptilium atropurpureum
(Siratro). They were established in rows 0.45 m apart in plots measuring 15 x 50 m on
sandy soils (pH 5.5 on CaCl2 scale). Each of the plots was fertilized with
single superphosphate at 200 kg/ha as recommended from soil analysis results.
Samples (cutting height 10 cm above soil
level) were taken from six randomly selected rows at 8, 14 and 20 weeks of growth after
germination. One portion was sun-dried in the field; the other portion was dried in an
oven 60 ºC for 48 hours. During sun drying
in the field the forages were turned twice a day for four days to ensure even drying.
Three mature Holstein-Friesian steers weighing 440 ± 20 kg, each surgically fitted with a rumen cannula of 8.5 cm internal diameter, were used to determine the degradability profiles of the dried foliages using the nylon bag technique (Bhargava and Ærskov 1987).
The steers were housed in individual pens measuring 3 x 2 m in the
bio-assay laboratory of the Department of Animal Science,
The dried foliages were milled (2 mm screen) and approximately 5 g
were placed in nylon bags of 8 x 15 cm and pore size of 40 to 45 mm (
The legume samples were analysed for nitrogen (N) using the Kjeldahl
procedure (AOAC 1984). Neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid
detergent lignin (ADL) and acid detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIN) were determined
according to the procedure of Goering and Van Soest (1970).
The DM degradability constants were determined using the iterative
least squares procedure according to the exponential equation of Ærskov and McDonald (1979):
DM degradability = a + b (1
e-ct)
Where a = soluble
fraction; b = slowly degradable fraction; c = rate of degradation of b; t = time of incubation; e = exponential constant.
Analysis of variance was carried out on the degradability and
effective degradability data using the General Linear Model Procedure (SAS 1990). The
analytical model for each variable was as follows:
Yhijk = m + Ah + Li + Dj +
Wk + (LD)ij + (LW)ik + (DW)jk + (LDW)ijk
+ ehijk
Where: Yhijk is the dependent variable
(rumen degradability of DM or effective DM degradability),
m is the overall mean,
A is
the effect of animal (h = 1, 2, 3),
Li is
the effect of legume species (i =1,2,3),
Dj is
the effect of drying method (j = 1, 2),
Wk is
the effect of stage of growth (k = 1, 2, 3),
(LD)ij
is the interaction between legume species and drying method,
(LW)ik
is the interaction between legume species and stage of growth,
(DW)jk
being the interaction between drying method and stage of growth,
(LDW)ijk being the interaction of the legume species, drying method and
the stage of growth and
eijk is the error term.
As expected, crude protein decreased and NDF, ADF and ADL increased with increasing age at harvesting.Siratro had a higher crude protein content at all stages of growth than the other legumes (Table 1). Oven drying increased the amount of N linked with the fibre (ADIN).
Table 1: Chemical composition (g/kg DM) of cassia, lablab and siratro harvested at three stages of growth and dried in the sun or in an oven |
|||||||
Legume (L) |
Week (W) |
Drying(D) |
CP |
NDF |
ADF |
ADL |
ADIN |
Cassia |
8 |
Sun |
225 |
343 |
282 |
84.4 |
53.3 |
Oven |
242 |
426 |
288 |
76.0 |
70.2 |
||
14 |
Sun |
221 |
507 |
368 |
73.7 |
16.1 |
|
Oven |
246 |
506 |
408 |
74.2 |
21.5 |
||
20 |
Sun |
184 |
545 |
323 |
70.3 |
6.5 |
|
Oven |
173 |
547 |
357 |
106 |
10.0 |
||
Lablab |
8 |
Sun |
252 |
375 |
294 |
89.3 |
35.3 |
Oven |
254 |
328 |
282 |
95.8 |
60.0 |
||
14 |
Sun |
221 |
455 |
331 |
76.2 |
35.5 |
|
Oven |
216 |
473 |
405 |
62.5 |
20.5 |
||
20 |
Sun |
162 |
522 |
386 |
78.3 |
9.0 |
|
Oven |
183 |
566 |
353 |
58.5 |
11.0 |
||
Siratro |
8 |
Sun |
282 |
351 |
323 |
101 |
59.9 |
Oven |
279 |
413 |
322 |
91.7 |
72.9 |
||
14 |
Sun |
238 |
546 |
433 |
56.1 |
15.2 |
|
Oven |
252 |
534 |
472 |
72.7 |
20.6 |
||
20 |
Sun |
229 |
465 |
334 |
143 |
12.0 |
|
Oven |
191 |
509 |
418 |
114 |
8.00 |
||
SED |
LxDxW |
5.94 |
5.05 |
4.68 |
0.90 |
0.39 |
|
Significance |
LxDxW |
*** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
*** |
|
Means
within the same column are different at * = P < 0.05; ** = P < 0.01; *** = P <
0.001; NS = not significant. |
The content of quickly degradable DM (QDDM)
did not differ between legumes at similar stages of growth, but decreased with increasing
maturity (Table 2).
Table 2: The DM degradability (g/kg) of cassia, lablab and siratro legumes harvested at 8, 14 and 20 weeks of growth and dried in the sun or in the oven |
||||||||
Legume (L) |
Week (W) |
Drying (D) |
a |
b |
c |
a + b |
p (k=0.02) |
P |
Cassia |
8 |
sun |
388 |
394 |
0.07 |
782 |
691 |
615 |
oven |
397 |
379 |
0.05 |
776 |
664 |
581 |
||
14 |
sun |
395 |
338 |
0.04 |
733 |
612 |
539 |
|
oven |
335 |
368 |
0.04 |
703 |
570 |
490 |
||
20 |
sun |
257 |
468 |
0.05 |
725 |
560 |
464 |
|
oven |
215 |
442 |
0.06 |
657 |
545 |
455 |
||
Lablab |
8 |
sun |
407 |
440 |
0.05 |
847 |
726 |
633 |
oven |
415 |
421 |
0.05 |
836 |
706 |
615 |
||
14 |
sun |
368 |
479 |
0.04 |
847 |
659 |
556 |
|
oven |
365 |
416 |
0.05 |
781 |
663 |
574 |
||
20 |
sun |
211 |
526 |
0.05 |
737 |
575 |
471 |
|
oven |
227 |
521 |
0.04 |
748 |
576 |
461 |
||
Siratro |
8 |
sun |
384 |
376 |
0.09 |
760 |
685 |
619 |
oven |
389 |
349 |
0.06 |
738 |
652 |
582 |
||
14 |
sun |
386 |
322 |
0.07 |
708 |
635 |
572 |
|
oven |
369 |
306 |
0.08 |
675 |
611 |
554 |
||
20 |
sun |
171 |
550 |
0.08 |
721 |
610 |
508 |
|
oven |
218 |
419 |
0.08 |
636 |
545 |
468 |
||
SED |
L |
8.73 |
11.2 |
0.01 |
9.82 |
6.04 |
7.58 |
|
D |
7.13 |
9.13 |
0.004 |
8.02 |
4.94 |
6.19 |
||
W |
8.73 |
11.2 |
0.01 |
9.82 |
6.05 |
7.58 |
||
L x D |
12.3 |
15.8 |
0.01 |
13.9 |
8.55 |
10.7 |
||
L x W |
15.1 |
19.4 |
0.01 |
17.0 |
10.5 |
13.1 |
||
D x W |
12.3 |
15.8 |
0.01 |
13.9 |
8.55 |
10.7 |
||
L x D x W |
21.4 |
27.4 |
0.01 |
24.1 |
14.8 |
18.6 |
||
Significance |
L |
ns |
*** |
** |
*** |
*** |
** |
|
D |
* |
** |
NS |
*** |
*** |
** |
||
W |
*** |
*** |
NS |
** |
*** |
*** |
||
L x D |
*** |
** |
NS |
NS |
* |
NS |
||
L x W |
NS |
* |
NS |
NS |
** |
* |
||
D x W |
NS |
NS |
NS |
* |
NS |
NS |
||
L x D x W |
NS |
* |
NS |
NS |
NS |
NS |
||
Means
in the same column are significantly different at * = P < 0.05,
** = P < 0.01, |
Forages harvested at 8 weeks of growth had greater (P < 0.01) amounts of QDDM content than of
forages harvested at 14 and 20 weeks of growth. Similarly, legumes harvested at 14 weeks
of growth had higher (P < 0.001) QDDM
compared to forage harvested at 20 weeks of growth.
The slowly degradable DM (SDDM) content of the legumes was dependent
on the interaction of legume species, drying method and stage of harvesting (L x D x W).
At 8 weeks of growth there were no significant (P
> 0.05) differences in the SDDM content of
cassia and lablab, and cassia and siratro on both drying methods. However, the SDDM
content of sun and oven dried lablab was greater (P
< 0.05) than that of siratro which received similar drying treatments. Sun drying of
the forages harvested at 14 weeks of growth resulted in higher (P < 0.05) SDDM content in lablab compared to
that of cassia while no differences (P >
0.05) were observed between the two legumes in oven dried forages and with siratro forage.
Lablab had a higher (P < 0.05) SDDM content
in both sun and oven dried materials compared to siratro forage which was either sun or
oven dried. Oven dried cassia also had a greater (P
< 0.05) amount of SDDM content compared to oven dried siratro while no differences (P > 0.05) were observed between the sun dried
materials of the two legumes. At 20 weeks of growth, lablab that was either sun or oven
dried had a higher (P < 0.05) SDDM content
than of cassia which received similar drying treatments. The SDDM content of oven dried
lablab was also greater (P < 0.05) than that
of oven dried siratro while no differences (P
> 0.05) were observed between the two legumes in their sun dried material. Sun dried
cassia had a lower (P < 0.05) SDDM content
compared to that of sun dried siratro while the two legumes did not differ (P > 0.05) in their SDDM contents in oven dried
forages. These variations among the legume species, drying method and stage of harvesting
in SDDM contents contributed to the observed three-way interaction.
The rate of degradation (c) of the SDDM fraction was influenced only
by the main effect of legume species. Siratro had a significantly higher (P < 0.01) rate of degradation at all stages of
growth and drying methods than either cassia or lablab that did not differ (P > 0.05). The mean rates of degradation were
0.05, 0.05 and 0.08/h, respectively, for cassia, lablab and siratro.
The potentially degradable DM fraction of the legumes was influenced by an interaction of drying method and stage of growth (D x W), and the main effect of legume species. Forages harvested at 8 weeks of growth and either sun or oven dried did not differ (P > 0.05) in their potentially degradable DM contents. However, at 14 and 20 weeks of growth, sun dried forages had greater (P < 0.05) mean content of potentially degradable DM compared to oven dried forages.
The variations in the potentially degradable DM content of the
forages due to drying method and stage of growth resulted in the observed two-way
interaction. Lablab had a greater (P < 0.001)
mean potentially degradable DM content compared to cassia and siratro, respectively.
Similarly, the potentially degradable DM content of cassia was also significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that of siratro. .
The estimated effective DM degradabilities (EDMD) at a rumen fractional outflow rate of 0.02/h were influenced by the interaction between legume species and drying method (L x D). Oven drying reduced (P < 0.05) the EDMD compared to sun drying in cassia and siratro forages (Figures 1 and 2), while in lablab forages there was no significant (P > 0.05) effect of the drying method. Among the legumes, sun dried cassia had a lower (P < 0.05) mean EDMD content compared to that of sun dried lablab and siratro. In contrast, oven dried cassia and siratro had similar (P > 0.05) EDMD contents which were lower (P < 0.05) than that of oven dried lablab These differences among the legume species due to drying treatment resulted in the L x D interaction.
Figure 1. Effective DM degradability (g/kg) of
either sun- or oven-dried cassia forage at different stages of growth. |
Figure 2. Effective DM degradability (g/kg) of
either sun- or oven-dried lablab forage at different stages of growth. |
The EDMD contents of the three legumes at an outflow rate of 0.02/h were also influenced by the interaction between legume species and stage of growth (L x W). Lablab harvested at 8 weeks of growth had a higher (P < 0.01) EDMD compared to those of cassia and siratro which were not different (P > 0.05). At 14 weeks of growth, lablab maintained a higher (P < 0.01) EDMD content compared to cassia and siratro. Cassia harvested at 20 weeks of growth had a lower (P < 0.01) EDMD content compared to that of lablab and siratro. The differences in EDMD content between cassia and siratro at 8 weeks of growth and lablab and siratro at 20 weeks of growth resulted in the interaction observed.
At an estimated rumen fractional outflow rate of 0.05/h the EDMD contents of the forages were influenced by an interaction between legume species and stage of growth, and the main effect of drying method. The three legumes had similar (P > 0.05) EDMD values at 8 weeks of growth. In contrast, at 14 weeks of growth, lablab and siratro had similar EDMD contents that were greater (P < 0.05) than that of cassia. When harvested at 20 weeks of growth, the three legumes were not different in their mean EDMD content except cassia which maintained a lower (P < 0.05) EDMD content compared to that of siratro. Oven drying of fresh forages reduced (P < 0.01) the EDMD content of the legumes compared to sun drying.
The high
oven drying temperatures of 60 oC reduced the QDDM content of the three legumes
at all stages of growth compared to sun drying. This finding is consistent with results
reported in earlier studies (Moshtaghi Nia and Ingalls 1995). Siratro, with a higher NDF content in sun dried
material, had lower QDDM content than cassia and lablab at all the three stages of
maturity. However, in oven dried forages the NDF contents of the three legumes were
similar and this was reflected in similar QDDM contents. The lower QDDM content of oven
dried forages may be associated with an increase in NDF content which is less readily
degradable and could also be also due to physio-chemical changes arising from
non-enzymatic reactions of soluble proteins and carbohydrates (Van Soest 1994). The QDDM
values obtained in this experiment were higher than values of 177 to 299 g/kg reported by
Mgheni et al (1993) for tropical herbaceous
legumes Desmodium uncinatum, Neonotonia wightii and Pueraria phaseoloides. These differences in QDDM
contents of the legumes at different stages of growth are due to a decline in cell
contents and an increase in cell wall with advancing maturity. These findings are in
agreement with those reported for alfalfa (Llamas-Lamas and Combs 1990; Balde et al 1993).
The SDDM contents of the legumes were within the range of 355 to 457 g/kg reported for other tropical herbaceous legumes (Mgheni et al 1993). Lablab maintained a higher SDDM content than either cassia or siratro at all stages of growth and this was due to its lower NDF and lignin content compared to cassia that was intermediate and siratro which had the highest (Table 1). The low degradability of forages with high NDF and lignin is due to reduced penetrative ability of rumen microbes through lignified plant cell walls (Akin 1989).
The
potential DM degradability values of these legumes are within the range of 485 to 870 g/kg
(Kimambo et al 1994) but higher than the range
of 532 to 740 g/kg reported for other herbaceous tropical legumes (Mgheni et al 1993). The decline in potentially degradable
DM contents of the legumes with increasing drying temperature and forage maturity may be
explained by increases in less degradable fractions accumulating in the forages such as
lignin. Lignified cells reduce the penetration of rumen fungal rhizoids (Akin et al 1974; Latham et al 1978) which results in reduced
degradability. In addition, lignin is reported to physically encrust structural
carbohydrates, preventing enzyme attack and inhibiting attachment of rumen microorganisms
(Coombe 1981). Because cell contents are virtually all degradable, differences in DM
degradability between the forages may be associated with the fibrous components such as
structural polysaccharides whose degradation varies among forages (Singh and Makkar 1992).
The rate of degradation (c) is important in determining effective degradation as well as rumen fill. The rates of DM degradation were not different between the stages of growth but varied among the legume species. This is in agreement with results reported by Balde et al (1993) in which alfalfa cut from early bud to full bloom had similar rates of DM degradation. In contrast, Hadjipanayiotou et al (1996) reported a decline in degradation rate of DM in vetch with increasing maturity. The rates of DM degradation for cassia, lablab and siratro are comparable to the values reported for other herbaceous tropical legumes (Mgheni et al 1993; Umunna et al 1995). The high CP content and the fragility of legume cell walls and high proportions of readily digestible thin-walled, non-lignified mesophyll tissues of the tropical legumes (Wilson and Kennedy 1996) could have resulted in the maintenance of high degradation rates even at advanced maturity.
The
effective DM degradability decreased with advancing maturity and high drying temperature
in the three legume forages. The changes in effective DM degradability with increasing
maturity and high drying temperature correspond closely with the changes in the
proportions of potentially degradable DM and increases in NDF content of the legumes.
These results are consistent with those reported in earlier studies (Balde et al 1993; Hadjipanayiotou et al 1996). Lablab maintained the highest
effective degradability at all stages of maturity, with cassia intermediate and siratro
was the least. These differences could have been caused by the species variation in fibre
content. Forages with low fibre content have been reported to have higher effective DM
degradabilities compared to those with high fibre content (Llamas-Lamas and Combs 1990).
Based on the findings of this study it can be concluded that legume
species, drying method and stage of maturity have a marked influence on chemical
composition and in sacco DM degradability of
forage legumes. Among the three legumes, siratro showed a higher sustained CP content
followed by cassia, and lablab was the least. The differences in chemical composition and
dry matter degradability of the legumes with stage of maturity and drying method could
explain variations in reported values in the literature and suggest that fixed
degradability values for tropical legume forages are inappropriate.
AOAC
1984. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official
Methods of Analysis, AOAC,
Akin
D E 1989 Histological and physical factors
affecting digestibility of forages. Agronomy Journal 81: 17-25.
Akin
D E, Burdick D and Michaels G E 1974 Rumen bacterial
interrelationships with plant tissue during degradation revealed by transmission electron
microscopy. Applied Microbiology 27: 1149-1156.
Balde
A T, Vandersall J H, Erdman R A, Reeves III J B and Glen B P 1993 Effect of stage of maturity of alfalfa
and orchadgrass on in situ dry matter and crude protein degradability and amino acid
composition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 44: 29-43.
Bhargava
P R and Ærskov E R 1987 (Editors), Manual for
the use of the nylon bag technique in the evaluation of feedstuffs. The Rowett Research
Institute,
Coombe J B 1981 Utilisation of low quality residues.
In: F.H.W. Morley, Grazing Animals-World Animal Science, Elsevier Scientific Publishing
Company,
Goering H
K and Van Soest P J 1970 (Editors) Forage fibre analysis.
Agricultural Handbook No. 379, US Department of Agriculture.
Hadjipanayiotou
M, Antoniou I, Theodoridou M and Photiou A 1996 In situ degradability of
forages cut at different stages of growth. Livestock Production Science 45: 49-53.
Kimambo
A E, Weisbjerg M R, Hvelplund T and Madsen J 1994 Feeding value of some
tropical feeds evaluated by the nylon bag technique. Proceedings of the Second biennial
conference of the African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET) held in
Latham
M J, Brooker B E, Pettipher G L and Harris P J 1978 Ruminococcus
flavefaciens cell wall and adhesion to cotton cellulose and to cell walls in leaves of
perennial ryegrass (Lolium perene). Applied
Environmental Microbiology 35: 156-165.
Llamas-Lamas
G and Combs D K 1990 Effect of alfalfa maturity on fiber
utilisation by high producing cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 1069.
Mgheni
D M, Hvelplund T and Weisbjerg M R 1993 Rumen degradability of
dry matter and protein in tropical grass and legume forages and their protein values
expressed in the AAT-PBV protein evaluation system. Proceedings of the Second biennial
conference of the African Feed Resources Network (AFRNET) held in
Moshtaghi
Nia S A and Ingalls J R 1995 Evaluation of moist heat
treatment of canola meal on digestion in the rumen, small intestine, large intestine and
total digestive tract of steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 75: 279-283.
Ærskov E R and McDonald I 1979 The estimation of protein
degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of
passage. Journal of Agricultural Science (
SAS 1990 Statistical Analysis System Institute
Inc., SAS users guide: Statistics, Version 6, 3rd edition, SAS Institute Inc.,
Singh
B and Makkar H P S 1992 Plant cell wall digestion in ruminants
- A Review. International Journal of Animal Science 7: 147-156.
Stern
M D, Varga G A, Clark J H, Firkins J L, Huber J T and Palmquist D L 1994 Evaluation of chemical and physical
properties of feeds that affect protein metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science
77: 2762-2786.
Umunna
N N, Nsahlai I V and Osuji P O 1995 Degradability of forage
protein supplements and their effects on the kinetics of digestion and passage. Small
Ruminant Research 17 (2): 145-152.
Van
Soest P J 1994 Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant:
Ruminant metabolism, nutritional strategies, the cellulolytic fermentation and the
chemistry of forages and fibres. O and B Books Inc.,
Wilson J R and Kennedy P M 1996 Plant and animal constraints to voluntary feed intake associated with fibre characteristics and particle breakdown and passage in ruminants. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47: 199-225.
Received 10 November 2002; Accepted 4 December 2002