Livestock Research for Rural Development 34 (1) 2022 LRRD Search LRRD Misssion Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Duckweed (Lemna minor) meal as partial replacement for fish meal in catfish (Clarias gariepinus) juvenile diets

Arnold Ebuka Irabor, Oghenebrorhie Obakanurhie1, Francis Oster Nwachi, Paterson Adogbeji Ekokotu, Jerimoth Kesena Ekelemu, Ovie Kingsley Awhefeada, Lydia Mosunmola Adeleke2, Hardin Pierre Jrn3 and Oghenefejiro Adagha

Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture. Delta State University, Abraka
iraborarnold@gmail.com
1 Department of Animal Sciences. Delta State University, Abraka
2 Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture Technology. Federal University of Technology, Akure
3 Ministry of Fisheries, Saint Lucia

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of duckweed (Lemna minor) meal inclusion levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80%) on the growth, blood and serum profiles of C. gariepinus juvenile cultured for 56days under well managed condition. Proximate analysis on the test ingredient revealed a significantly (P≤ 0.05) high crude protein content in the test ingredient. At the end of the experiment, data evaluated revealed that at 40% duckweed meal inclusion level significant (P≤ 0.05) increase in growth was observed in C. gariepinus juvenile, while as inclusion level increased (60% and above), decline in the growth rate was observed. The test diets had no negative impact on the blood and serum profile of the sampled fish because all parameters observed were within the normal range. The water quality parameters examined revealed no adverse effect of the test diets on the water quality. Conclusively, 40% inclusion level of duckweed meal in the diet of C. gariepinus juvenile is best for optimum growth performance without any adverse effect.

Keywords: feed formulation, Lemna minor, nutrient, performance


Introduction

Catfish culture has overtime become the desire of most fish farmers due to its continuous increasing demand (Ganesh et al 2021). As the world’s campaign for the consumption of less fatty food continues to intensify, people consider fish and its products as a reliable and affordable option for required protein (FAO 2021; WHO 2021; Henchion et al 2017). However, due to the high cost of fish feed resulting from cost and scarcity of ingredients, there has been a shortfall in fish production (Hua et al 2019). In a bid to cutdown production cost, farmers sought to replace the expensive fish meal with alternative plant protein sources (Gasco et al 2018; Ayadi et al 2012).

Duckweed (Lemna minor) is one among the numerous species of Lemnaceae family found in the freshwaters of tropical and sub-tropical regions. It is a greenish passive aquatic plant with floating roots less than 1 cm in length and fronds ranging a few centimeters in width (Iqbal et al 2019). This aquatic plant is easy to grow due to its regenerative characteristic and can be blown to nutrient-rich areas by wind. Spontaneous growth of duckweed is commonly achieved in ponds, ditches, or swamps with abundant nutrients (Marcin et al 2019; Khellaf and Zardaoui 2010). In addition, duckweed is known for its rapid growth and long-lasting freshness which has informed its wide range of uses (Baek et al 2021).

Duckweed contains very significant levels of protein (40 – 43% dry weight), phosphorus, potassium, minor minerals and amino acids profile, superior to other plants (Stadtlander et al 2019). Furthermore, it has other qualities such as a low fibre content (5% in dry matter), which makes it readily digestible. Its production rate averages about 30 tons yearly of dry matter/ha which is dependent on nutrients availability, species, management, space and climate (Cao et al 2018).

The replacement of fishmeal with duckweed in catfish diet as one of the main protein sources is prominent, therefore this study examined how different quantities of fishmeal substituted for duckweed meal affected the performance of Clarias gariepinus juveniles.


Materials and Methods

Study area

The two phases study was done in the Research farm and Aquaculture lab both in Delta State University, Asaba. Asaba is one among the prominent local government areas that makes up Oshimili South. Latitudinal and longitudinal description are within 40N to 100N and 60E to 80E respectively.

Feed ingredients

Prior to the formulation of the experimental diets, all necessary feed ingredients apart from the duckweed (Table 1) were procured from the popular Akwaza market Asaba metropolis, Delta state and milled into mixture. The test ingredient (duckweed) was identified and harvested from well-managed earthen ponds specially reserved for the purpose, dried at room temperature, crutched into powder preserved in sealed flask. In the right percentages (20%, 40%, 60% and 80%), the duckweed meal (D) was mixed with other ingredients and pelleted into 2mm fish feed using an automated pelletizer.

Photo 1. A. Duckweed in waterbody; B. Formulated pellets
Experimental design and sample collection

The total fish samples used for the study were one thousand five hundred (1500) healthy C. gariepinus juvenile sourced from the University Research Farm. The initial weight (9.5g) and length (7.2cm) of the fish was ascertained to the nearest 0.1 error margin using sensitive balance and meter rule respectively. To reduce the effects of stress, fish samples were immersed for 20mins in 2-ppm sodium per manganate solution before stocking into well aerated concrete tank measuring 8 m X 6 m X 3 m and twice/day feeding routine (7:00 am and 6:00 pm) using Ziglar feed (2 mm) 14 days prior to the start of feeding trial.

The fish samples were stocked in quadruplicate of seventy-five (75) C. gariepinus juveniles per rearing tank measuring 4 m X 2 m X 1.3 m with well oxygenated water. According to the experimental diets to be administered, tanks were well labelled D1-4 0% (control), D1-4 20%, D1-4 40%, D1-4 60%, and D 1-4 80%. Although the control tanks were fed same experimental diet but with D 0% inclusion level. The formulated diets were administered appropriately at a 5% body weight twice/day (7:00 am and 6 pm) and proper water quality management was adhered.

Sample measurement to determine the fish growth parameters was done biweekly, while the haematological profile, serum and carcass quality of the sample were conducted in conclusion of the feeding experiment (56days). Growth parameters were determined using sensitive scale for weight and calibrated meter rule for length. Stress resulting from the sampling exercise was minimized using harvest techniques are recommended by Irabor et al (2021).

Compounding the diets

Fish feed of 40% crude protein was formulated from the composition of the feed ingredients (Table 1)

Table 1. Percentage composition of diets (%)

D 0%

D 20%

D 40%

D 60%

D 80%

Fish meal

40.0

34.2

28.4

22.6

16.8

Soya beans

10.4

10.4

10.4

10.4

10.4

Groundnut cake

17.2

17.2

17.2

17.2

17.2

Wheat offal

10.5

10.5

10.5

10.5

10.5

Yellow maize

18.5

18.5

18.5

18.5

18.5

Duck weed

0.00

5.80

11.6

17.4

23.2

Vitamin premix

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Bone meal

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Lysin

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.30

Methionine

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.30

Salt

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.30

0.30

Starch (Binder)

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

0.50

Study duration

The study lasted for a period of 56 days (September to November, 2021).

Evaluation of feed utilization and growth indices

Feed utilization which includes feed conversion ratio and feed intake as well as growth indices such as body weight gain were calculated using the method as described by Irabor et al (2021). Survival rate was also determined using the method as described by Limbu (2020).

Blood and serum evaluation

The blood profile was examination was carried out using the methods as described by Kone et al (2017) and Anand et al (2020). This was to determine the effect of the test ingredient on the blood and serum profile of the sampled fish.

Water quality

The readings of some significant physicochemical parameters were examined using the methods as described by Muna et al (2021).

Statistical Analysis

The data obtained from the study were subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA as the tool from SPSS version 25, while the means were differentiated using Duncan multiple range tests at P≤ 0.05 level of significance.


Results

Proximate analysis was conducted on the test ingredients (duckweed) and results presented in Table 2. The test ingredient revealed a significantly high crude protein level (41.08%).

Table 2. Proximate compositions of duckweed

Parameters

Percentage

Moisture

9.15

Crude protein (CP)

41.08

Crude Fibre (CF)

1.25

Ether Extract (EE)

2.18

Ash

8.63

Nitrogen Free Extract (NFE)

37.71

The proximate composition of the test diets was ascertained and presented in Table 3. Diet with 40% inclusion level of the test ingredient had the highest crude protein level (40.47%), while the lowest crude protein level (32.71%) was observed in 80% inclusion of duckweed.

Table 3. Proximate composition of the diets (% in DM)

Parameters

D 0

D 20

D 40

D 60

D 80

Crude protein (%)

40.16

39.49

40.42

38.23

35.71

Ether Extract (%)

2.39

2.62

2.96

3.52

2.76

Crude fibre (%)

2.07

2.14

2.96

3.63

4.82

Moisture (%)

3.36

5.75

5.83

5.76

4.36

Total ash (%)

7.69

10.09

11.63

12.89

13.70

NFE

43.82

39.73

35.94

35.66

32.9

The differences in growth parameters and diets utilization were presented in Table 4. The highest body weight (35.52g) and survival rate (96%) were recorded at DWM 40% inclusion level, while the lowest (24.29g) and (68%) respectively, were observed in 80% inclusion level. The best value for feed conversion ratio (1.98) was observed at DWM 40% inclusion level, while that of 80% inclusion level was poor (2.65).

Table 4. Growth performance and nutrient utilization of C. gariepinus fed test diets at 56 days

Parameters

D 0

D 20

D 40

D 60

D 80

SEM

p

IW (g)

10.52

10.51

10.50

10.53

10.50

0.000

0.061

FW (g)

42.14c

42.62b

46.02a

37.11d

34.79e

7.367

0.012

BWG (g)

31.62b

32.11b

35.52a

26.58c

24.29d

0.260

0.001

FI/56Day/Fish (g)

77.47a

73.12b

70.37c

68.19d

64.41e

3.240

0.011

FI/Day/Fish (g)

1.38a

1.34b

1.27bc

1.16c

1.15c

1.023

0.073

FCR

2.45c

2.28d

1.98e

2.57b

2.65a

0.000

0.001

SR (%)

94b

92c

96a

82d

74e

9.440

0.021

D: Duckweed meal; IW: initial weight; FW: final weight; BWG: body weight gain; FI: feed intake; FCR: feed conversion ratio; SR: survival rate; SEM: Standard error of mean; SIG.: Significant P>0.05 difference



Figure 1. Relationship between feed intake and duckweed in the diet DM in diets Figure 2. Relationship between live weight gain and duckweed level in the diet


Figure 3. Relationship between feed conversion and duckweed diets Figure 4. Relationship between survival rate and duckweed in diets

The blood and serum profile of the sampled fish was evaluated at the end of the experiment and the results was presented in Table 5. All parameters were within normal. However, there were slight increase and decrease amongst parameters as inclusion levels increased.

Table 5. Blood and serum profile of C. gariepinus fingerling at 56 days

Parameters

D 0

D 20

D 40

D 60

D 80

SEM

p

PCV (%)

28.14b

28.10b

29.49a

27.61b

25.29c

0.321

0.012

WBC (103 mm-3)

6.86b

6.77b

6.91b

7.49a

7.91a

0.004

0.041

RBC (103 mm-3)

3.29b

3.42b

3.65a

2.87bc

2.61c

0.001

0.001

Hb (g/100 ml)

8.36a

8.17ab

8.33a

8.25bc

7.86c

0.002

0.033

LYMPH (%)

56.72d

56.81d

58.14c

60.27b

65.14a

0.027

0.039

MCHC (%)

30.59c

31.21b

33.01a

29.41d

30.19cd

0.031

0.020

MCH (pg)

29.21e

30.19d

33.28c

37.32b

43.53a

1.002

0.052

MCV (fl)

89.34e

92.71d

104.21c

122.12b

131.18a

11.002

0.004

ALT (UL-1)

10.59c

11.05bc

11.60b

12.29ab

12.47a

0.528

0.007

AST (UL-1)

19.76cd

20.32c

21.96b

22.58a

23.42a

2.003

0.004

ALP (UL-1)

44.62d

45.13d

47.21c

52.22b

55.95a

9.022

0.061

PCV, Packed cell volume; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; Hb, haemoglobin; LYMPH, lymphocyte; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCV, mean corpuscular volume, ALT, Alanine aminotransferase; AST, Aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, Alkaline phosphatase; SEM: Standard error of mean; SIG.: Significant P>0.05 difference

The carcass of the sampled fish revealed significant (P≤ 0.05) decrease in crude lipid and crude protein as D inclusion levels increased in the diets, while other parameters showed significant (P≤ 0.05) increase (Table 6).

Table 6. Proximate analysis on the carcass of C. gariepinus after 56 days of culture

Parameters

D 0

D 20

D 40

D 60

D 80

SEM

p

Moisture content

6.34d

6.31d

6.37c

6.48b

6.64a

0.230

0.002

Crude lipid

5.79ab

6.28a

5.69ab

5.72b

5.09c

1.002

0.001

Crude protein

62.52a

62.30ab

61.45b

60.58bc

60.34cd

0.337

0.004

Crude fibre

0.07

0.07

0.08

0.08

0.09

1.310

0.012

Total ash

5.86c

6.23ab

6.29a

6.17b

6.11b

0.826

0.000

NFE

19.73

19.92

20.23

20.81

21.11

3.053

0.025

NFE; Nitrogen free extra; SEM: Standard error of mean; SIG.: Significant P>0.05 difference

Some of the physicochemical parameters of the culture media were observed and presented in Table 7. The values recorded showed pH and DO values were highest in tank fed 0% inclusion level of test ingredient, while the lowest was observed at 40% inclusion level. Temperature value was highest at 60% inclusion level, while 0% inclusion level had the least value.

Table 7. Summary of physicochemical parameters

Parameter

D 0

D 20

D 40

D 60

D 80

pH

7.35

7.28

7.19

7.37

7.23

DO (mg/L)

6.32

6.31

6.22

6.31

6.28

Temperature (oC)

30.2

29.7

30.4

29.8

30.1


Discussion

The values observed from the proximate analysis revealed on the test ingredient (duckweed) ranged between the values reported by Ullah et al (2021). The proximate composition of the diets showed significant (P≤ 0.05) difference as test ingredient inclusion in the diets increased especially the crude protein level which was higher compared to soyabean meal making it a potential plant protein source for fish feed (Hameed et al 2020).

The experimental diets had crude protein levels within the acceptable range 35 – 45% for the culture of C. gariepinus juvenile. This confirmed the findings of Radulović et al (2021) and Leng et al (1995) where a crude protein of 40 and 43% was recorded respectively in formulated catfish feed with DWM as additive.

Growth performance and feed utilization revealed a significant increase in weight of C. gariepinus juvenile fed diets as percentages of DWM increased. Although there was also significant decline at 60% and 80% DWM inclusion levels. The improved growth observed was attributed to the optimum nutrients and low fibre (below 10%) content present in the DWM. This confirms the reports of Yuniel et al (2021) who attributed the recorded increased growth rate in C. gariepinus fingerlings fed diets with varying levels of duckweed meal as additives to the high nutrient and low fiber content of duckweed. However, the decrease in growth observed at inclusion levels 60% and above can be attributed to poor feed utilization. Same was observed as DWM inclusion levels increased to 50% in Nile tilapia feed (Tavares et al 2008).

Feed intake recorded showed a proportionate decline as DWM inclusion levels increased across treatments. This could be linked to the digestibility, palatability and nutrient of the diets as inclusion levels increased to 60% DWM and above. This is similar to the findings of Yuniel et al (2021) who reported significant decrease in feed intake as inclusion levels of duckweed meal (Lemna perpusilla) in diets of C. gariepinus fingerlings. Also, Olaniyi and Oladunjoye (2012) recorded decline in the feed acceptability in O. niloticus as inclusion levels of duckweed meal (Lemna minor) increased to 50% and above.

The blood and serum profile of the sampled fish were within the normal range which indicated DWM had no adverse effects on C. gariepinus juveniles. Although, significant increase and decrease was observed in the parameters examined as DWM inclusion levels increased. This can be attributed to the antioxidant characteristics of duckweed. A similar finding was recorded by Irabor et al (2021) where moringa leave meal as feed additives caused significant fluctuation in the blood profile of C. gariepinus juveniles. Also, Xuhui et al (2020) recorded a proportionate decrease in the blood and serum indices as inclusion levels of fermented moringa leave meal increased in diets of Carassius gibelio juvenile.

Carcass quality of C. gariepinus juvenile revealed the impact of DWM inclusion in the diets. A corresponding increase in the values of NFE, crude fibre and moisture content of the carcass was observed as DWM inclusion levels increased. Although, crude protein and fibre values decreased as DWM inclusion levels increased. This could be linked to the effects of NFE, moisture and fibre contained in duckweed. Same results were recorded in the carcass of C. gariepinus juvenile fed diets with varying inclusion levels of moringa leaf meal (Irabor et al 2021).

Water quality parameters of the culture tanks were not influenced significantly by the test ingredient (DWM). Temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen across the treatments were all within acceptable range. However, there were insignificant changes in the water qualities examined across treatments as DWM inclusion increased. This also contributed to the performance of the sampled fish due to favorable environmental condition. This confirmed the finding of Huong et al (2020) who reported optimum growth of Chitala ornate reared in culture tanks with average temperature between 30 – 32 oC. A contrary record was given in Islam et al (2020) who recorded minimal growth of Dicentrarchus labrax as inclusion levels of moringa leave meal increased in the diets. Although, the poor growth was linked to stress resulting from turbid water caused by excess waste (uneaten feed).


Conclusion


Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the entire staff of Fisheries Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Delta State University, Abraka for their immeasurable support via supply of necessary materials for this work.


References

Anand G, Srivastava P P, Varghese T, Sahu N P, Xavier M, Harikriskna V, Prabhakaran A and Kumari P, 2020 Haematological and histoarchitectural alterations in Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus 1758) fed with Sesbania leaf meal Journal of Environmental Biology 41, 1082-1088.

Ayadi F Y, Rosentrater K A and Muthukumaprappan K 2012 Alternative protein sources for aquaculture feeds. Journal of Aquaculture Feed Science and Nutrition 4: 1–26.

Baek GahYoung, Maham Saeed and Hyung‑Kyoon Choi 2021 Duckweeds: their utilization, metabolites and cultivation, Appl Biol Chem 64(73), 1 – 15, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-021-00644-z

Cao H X, Fourounjian P and Wang W 2018 The Importance and Potential of Duckweeds as a Model and Crop Plant for Biomass-Based Applications and Beyond. In: Hussain C. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58538-3_67-1

Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) 2021 Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all, FAO Rome Report 2020, Digital Report. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cb4474en/

Ganesh Kumar, Carole Engle, Jonathan H N Van Senten and Shraddha Gurupad Hegde 2021 Economics of U.S. catfish farming practices: Profitability, economies of size, and liquidity, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 51(3) DOI: 10.1111/jwas.12717

Gasco Laura, Gai Francesco, Maricchiolo Giulia, Genovese Lucrezia, Ragonese Sergio, Bottari Teresa and Caruso Gabriella 2018 Fishmeal Alternative Protein Sources for Aquaculture Feeds. Feeds for the Aquaculture Sector. 10.1007/978-3-319-77941-6_1.

Hameed Ishfaq, Hafiz Ullah and Khushnood U Rahman 2020 Effect of pH levels on duckweed’s proximate composition for utilization as poultry and fish feed, Bioscience Research 17(4): 2604-2613

Henchion Maeve, Maria Hayes, Anne M. Mullen, Mark Fenelon and Brijesh Tiwari 2017 Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium" Foods 6(7), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6070053

Hua Katheline, Cobcroft M Jennifer, Cole Andrew, Condon Kelly, Jerry R Dean, Mangott Arnold, Praeger Christina, Vucko J Matthew, Zeng Chaoshu, Zenger Kyall and Strugnell M Jan, 2019 The Future of Aquatic Protein: Implications for Protein Sources in Aquaculture Diets, One Earth, 1(3), 316-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018 .

Huong D T, Le T H, Sovan L, Vu N U and Nguyen T P 2020 Effects of nitrite at different temperatures on physiological parameters and growth in clown knifefish (Chitala ornata, Gray 1831) Aquaculture 521.

Iqbal J, Javed A and Baig M A 2019 Growth and nutrient removal efficiency of duckweed (lemna minor) from synthetic and dumpsite leachate under artificial and natural conditions. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0221755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221755

Irabor A E, Ekokotu P A, Obakanurhe O, Adeleke M L, Obugara J E and Ayamre E U 2021 Moringa oleifera leaf meal as partial replacement of soybean meal in diets ofClarias gariepinus juveniles Livestock Research for Rural 33(8). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd33/8/33100obaka.html

Islam M J, Kunzmann A, Bögner M, Meyer A, Thiele R and James S M 2020 Metabolic and molecular stress responses of European seabass Dicentrarchus labrax at low and high temperature extremes Ecological Indicators 112, 106118.

Khellaf N and Zardoui M 2010 Growth, Photosynthesis and Respiratory Response to Copper in Lemna minor: A Potential Use of Duckweed in Biomonitoring. Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 7(4):299-306.

Kone B, Maiga M, Baya B, Sarro Y D S, Coulibaly N, Kone A, Diarra B, Sanogo M, Togo A C G, Goita D, Dembele M, Polis M A, Warfield J, Belson M, Dao S, Orsega S, Murphy R L, Diallo S and Siddiqui S 2019 Establishing Reference Ranges of Hematological Parameters from Malian Healthy Adults. Journal of Blood and Lymph; 7(1). DOI:10.4172/2165-7831.1000154.

Leng R A, Stambolie J H and Bell R 1995 Duckweed - a potential high-protein feed resource for domestic animals and fish. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 7 (1). https://www.fao.org/ag/AGA/AGAP/FRG/lrrd/lrrd7/1/cont71.htm

Limbu Samwel Mchele 2020 The effects of on-farm produced feeds on growth, survival, yield and feed cost of juvenile African sharptooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus), Aquaculture and Fisheries, 5(1), 58-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2019.07.002.

Marcin Sońta,Anna Rekiel and Martyna Batorska 2019 Use of Duckweed (Lemna L.) in Sustainable Livestock Production and Aquaculture – A Review, Annals of Animal Science 19(2), 257 – 271. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2018-0048

Muna A D, Mohammad E, Habib A, Bashar A, Azza J and Wassim G 2021 First assessment of water quality of an artificial lake for fish culture and irrigation: A case study of water reuse in water shortage area across the Middle East Aquaculture Research, 52(3); 1267-1281

Olaniyi C O and Oladunjoye I O 2012 Replacement value of duckweed (Lemna minor) in Nile tilapia ( Oreoochromis niloticus) diet. Transnational Journal of Science and Technology 2(9):54-62.

Radulovic O, Stankovic S, Stanojevic O, Vujcic Z, Dojnov B, Trifunovic-Momcilov M and Markovic M 2021 Antioxidative Responses of Duckweed (Lemna minor L.) to Phenol and Rhizosphere-Associated Bacterial Strain Hafnia paralvei C32-106/3. Antioxidants 10, 1719. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10111719

Stadtlander T, Förster S, Rosskothen D and Leiber F 2019 Slurry-grown duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza) as a means to recycle nitrogen into feed for rainbow trout fry. J Clean Prod 228:86–93

Tavares F A, Bosco J, Rodrigues R, Fracalossi D M, Esquivel J and Rouback R 2008 Dried duckweed and commercial feed promote adequate growth performance of tilapia fingerlings. Biotemas, 21 (3):91-97.

Ullah Hafiz, Bakhtiar Gul, Haroon Khan and Umar Zeb 2021 Effect of salt stress on proximate composition of duckweed (Lemna minor L.), Heliyon, 7(6), e07399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07399.

World Health Organisation (WHO) 2021 The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. Rome, FAO. 240. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en

Xuhui Z, Zhiyuan S, Jinfeng C, Jiahong W, Guibin W, Zunling Z and Fuliang C 2020 Effects of dietary fish meal replacement by fermented moringa (Moringa oleifera Lam.) Leaves on growth performance nonspecific immunity and Disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophilain juvenile gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibeliovar. CAS III) Fish and Shellfish Immunology 102; 430–439.

Yuniel Méndez-Martínez, Yilian Perez Tamames and Edilmar Cortes-Jacinto 2021 Effect of duckweed meal dietary inclusion on growth performance and survival of African catfishfingerlings. Rev. Fac. Agron. (LUZ). 38: 84-104. Enero-Marzo. https://doi.org/10.47280/RevFacAgron(LUZ).v38.n1.05