Livestock Research for Rural Development 31 (6) 2019 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Evaluation of production performance of Arsi-Holstein Friesian crossbred dairy cattle: A case of Assela Model Agricultural Enterprise, Arsi zone, Oromia Region

Teshome Gedefa, Ajebu Nurfeta and Nega Tola

Salale University, Salale, Ethiopia
teshu.bi@gmail.com

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the productive performance of Arsi-Holstein-Friesian crossbred dairy cows at Assela Model Agricultural Enterprise (AMAE). A retrospective study was carried out using data recorded from 1996 to 2011 to estimate adjusted lactation milk yield (ALMY, adjusted 305 days), lactation length (LL), birth weight (BW) and weaning weight (WWT). Fixed factors considered were year (16), season (3), parity (6) and blood level (4). The overall least square means of ALMY, BW, WWT, LL, were 2155 kg, 34 kg, 71 kg, and 314 days, respectively. Season had no significant effect on ALMY and LL. Year of calving had significant (p<0.05) effect on ALMY. Year of calving showed significant influences (p<0.01) on LL. There was no significant difference among blood levels in ALMY and LL. Lower (p<0.05) ALMY was recorded for parity 6 th+ than that of 2nd and 3rd, while the other parities were intermediate. There was no significant (p<0.05) difference among parities in LL. Sex and blood levels showed significant (p<0.05) effect on BW and WWT. The BW for males was higher (p<0.05) than that of females, whereas, the WWT for female was higher (p<0.05) than that of male. Year had an important role in determining the performance of dairy cows indicating there was variation in feed availability and quality as well as variation in management through the years. Therefore, stabilized environment, setting breeding program, and benchmarking parity number is important to improve productive performance of the farm.

Key words: Arsi, crossbred, holstein-friesian productive


Introduction

There are a huge number of cattle in Ethiopia, with 53.4 million heads of genetically diverse cattle (CSA 2011) and has the largest population in Africa. Cattle production plays an important role in the economies and livelihoods of farmers and pastoralists. The agricultural sector in Ethiopia, engaging 85% of the population, contributes 52% to the gross domestic product (GDP) and 90% to the foreign exchange earnings (CSA 2008). The share of livestock is estimated at 45% of the gross domestic product. Cattle produce a total of 3.6 billion liters of milk (CSA 2011). Despite the large numbers, the production and productivity per animal is very low (Aynalem 2006). This is because indigenous cattle have been naturally selected for years towards adaptive traits as tolerance and resistance to diseases, high fertility, unique product qualities, longevity and adaptation to harsh environments and poor quality feeds. Attempts, to improve the productivity of cattle, have been made especially in the area of crossbreeding for the last five decades but with little success (Aynalem 2006).

Ethiopia has a huge potential to be one of the key countries in dairy production for various reasons (Pratt et al 2008). These include a large population of milking cows in the country estimated to be 10.7 million (CSA 2011), a huge potential for production of high quality feeds under rain fed and irrigated conditions, existence of a relatively large human population with a long tradition of consumption of milk and milk products and hence a potentially large domestic market (Holloway et al 2000), existence of a large and relatively cheap labor force and opportunities for export to neighboring countries and beyond.

The total consumption of milk in the developing countries is projected to increase from 64 million metric tons in 1993 to 391 million metric tons by the year 2020, which is 138 percent increase. Much of this increased demand will be in urban centers in which population is to grow at a rate of 5-6 from 1990-2025 (Mihret 2006). Moreover, the trends of population increase; income growth and urbanization will fuel this tremendous growth in demand.

Milk yield is a product of animal genetic and environmental interactions (Johnson 1991). Milk yield for specific genotype is the function of climate and its interactive influences on the quantity and quality of feeds, the presence of disease and parasite and the utilization of technology to alleviate nutritional, thermal and health limitations. Milk production systems in the tropics are diverse. At one extreme the systems are similar to those in most industrialized countries and are based on cows of high genetic potential given “high quality feeds” which includes fodder crops/silage, grain and protein concentrates (Leng 1991). Milk production per cow is extremely high and technological inputs are high. Even in some specialized large scale farms lactation milk yield of pure Holstein cows is far below their expected genetic potential (Sendros and Tesfaye 1998).

Motivation for popularizing crossbreeding between high-yielding European dairy breeds and cattle breeds adapted to local environments was initiated in the national agricultural research system (NARS) of Ethiopia in the early 1970s. As compared to other dairy cattle genetic improvement strategies, this approach was believed to be the only feasible and quick way of increasing milk production in Ethiopia. The outcomes of the crossbreeding programs have been amply reported in several literatures with various outcomes (Demeke et al 2004).

However, the dairy cattle genetic improvement program started in Ethiopia in the early 1970s has never been subjected to periodic evaluation for the genetic and environmental trends. Thus, the effectiveness of this program is not clearly known. Moreover, no information is available on the status of the national dairy cattle genetic improvement program that guide policy makers, development planners and breeders to redesign appropriate breeding programs that respond to the current scenarios in Ethiopia. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to investigate production performance of Arsi-Holstein-Friesian crossbred of different blood levels at Assela Model Agriculture Enterprise Dairy Farm. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was evaluating the productive performance of dairy cows with different exotic blood level.


Materials and methods

Description of the study areas

The data was conducted at Assela Model Agriculture Enterprise Dairy Farm, which is located in the Arsi Zone of the Oromia Regional state about 175 kilometers from Addis Ababa. The city has a latitude and longitude of 7°57′N39°7′E and 7.95°N39.117°E, with an elevation of 2430 meters above sea level, respectively and with the minimum and maximum temperature ranging from 5 and 18 °C, respectively, around the year (KARC 2008)

Data collection method and study design

A retrospective type of study was carried out to evaluate the productive performance of Arsi-Holstein-Friesian crossbred Dairy Farm. Recorded data for the last 16 years (1996-2011 G.C.) on the productive of the breed in the Farm was used for this study. Only data’s with complete information was included in the study.

Data analysis

The General Linear Models (GLM) procedure of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 2007, (version 16.0) was used for data analysis. Mean of different traits were then tested by Duncan Multiple Range. Two statistical models were used during data analysis; model 1 was used to analysis data on LMY and LL, model 2 for BW and WWT.

Model 1: Yijklot = u + Bi + Sj + YRk + Pl + eijkl

Where:

Yijklot = LMY and LL of nth cow in lth parity, kth period of calving, jth season of calving and i th exotic blood level

u = overall mean

Bi = the effect of ith exotic blood level (i=1…, 4)

Sj = the effect of jth season of calving (j=1…, 3)

YRk = the effect of kth period (year) of calving (k=1…, 16)

Pl = the effect of lth parity (l=1…, 6)

eijkl = random residual error term

Model 2: Yijk=μ+ai+bj+ (a*b) k + eijk

Where: Yijk = birth weight (BW) and weaning weight (WWT) of nth cow in ith sex, jth blood levels and kth interaction

u = overall mean

ai = the effect of ith sex (i=1, 2)

bj = the effect of jth blood levels (j=1…, 4)

(a* b)k = kth effect of sex and blood level interaction

eijk = random residual error term


Results and discussion

Adjusted lactation milk yield

Least square means of lactation milk yield and days in milk are summarized in Table 1. The overall least square means of adjusted lactation milk yield and days in milk observed in this study were 2155 (kg) and 314 (days), respectively. Analysis of variance showed that year of calving had significant (p < 0.05) effect on lactation milk yield. In addition, year of calving showed significant effect (p < 0.05) on days in milk. Season of calving showed non-significant effect on lactation milk yield and days in milk.

Lactation milk yield for the year 2008 was lower than that of the years 1996, 1997, 2005 and 2010. In addition, lactation milk yield for 1996 was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of the other years. Moreover, lactation milk yield for the year 1997 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the years 2002, 2004 and 2007. Lactation lengths for the year 2005 was lower than that of the years 1996, 2000, 2010 and 2011, whereas, the lactation length for the other years were intermediate.

Table 1. Least means (± S.E.) of adjusted milk yield per lactation and lactation length by season and
year for Arsi-Holstein–Friesian crossbred cows at Assela Model Agriculture Enterprise Dairy Farm

Fixed variables

No

Adjusted lactation
milk yield (kg)

Lactation
length (days)

Overall

855

2155±33

314±1

Seasons:

NS

NS

Dry season (Oct-Jan)

307

2178±55

313±2

Short rain season (Feb-May)

287

2128±57

315±2

Long rain season (Jun-Sept)

261

2160±61

314±2

Years:

*

***

1996

66

2514±120d

318±4b

1997

69

2335±121c

308±4ab

1998

65

2053±120abc

316±4ab

1999

62

2026±122abc

312±4ab

2000

63

2265±123abc

319±4b

2001

57

2075±127abc

314±4ab

2002

54

1979±130ab

311±4ab

2003

60

2035±126abc

313±4ab

2004

55

1950±134ab

315±4ab

2005

65

2555±122bc

309±4a

2006

54

2075±131abc

317±4ab

2007

44

1865±142ab

317±5ab

2008

29

1846±167a

312±5ab

2009

38

2183±151abc

312±5ab

2010

47

2401±146bc

310±5b

2011

27

2157±173abc

319±6b

Within column least square means not carrying the same superscripts are significantly different.
NS=not significant, *=significant (p<0.05), ***=significant (p <0.01. There is no significant
difference among mean values that share common superscript and vice versa.

Adjusted lactation milk yield in the current study was lower than the values reported by Gebeyehu (2005), who reported that lifetime milk yield of F1, 3/4, 7/8 and 15/16 Friesian x Boran crosses to be 14342, 12074, 7891 and 7343 kg, respectively. On the other hand, 2042.11 kg, 1900.3 kg and 1872 kg were reported by Belay et al (2012), Kefena et al (2011) and Kiwuwa et al (1983) for Zebu-Holstein-Friesian crossbred dairy cows in Jimma Town, in the central tropical highlands of Ethiopia and Assela, respectively, which was lower than the current result.

Million and Tadelle (2003) and Gebeyehu (1999) reported absence of season effect on lactation milk yield, which agree with the present result. However, Amasaib et al (2011) reported that animals which gave birth in winter produced more total lactation milk yield than that of animals which gave birth in summer and autumn, whilst they reported no difference in daily milk yield among seasons. In the present study, the lack of effect of season on milk yield could be explained by supplementation, which probably evened out feed supplies across seasons eliminating possible feed related seasonal fluctuations in milk yield (Muasya et al 2007). In addition, it is indicated that in the tropics, the influence of climatic conditions may be negligible under optimal feeding and management conditions (Aynalem et al 2008). Moreover, Hirooka and Bhuttyan (1995) reported that season of calving had not influenced many milk production traits of crosses of local and Holstein cows.

The significant effect of year on lactation milk yield was reported for Zebu and their crosses with Holstein Friesian cattle (Gebeyehu 1999; Million and Tadelle 2003 and Kefena et al 2011) and Sahiwal cattle (Trail and Gregory 1981). The variation in milk production performance over years may not only be caused by inter-annual random change of the climatic factors but also include management changes (Aynalem et al 2008).

Kiwuwa et al (1983) reported lower total lactation milk yield for Zebu, local Arsi, ½ Jersey ½ Arsi, ½ HF ½ Arsi and ½ Exotic ½ Arsi than the current results, whereas, ½ HF ½ Zebu is comparable with this study. Moreover, lactation milk yield for 75% exotic blood levels of the current study was comparable with 75% HF-Arsi, HF-Zebu, Exotic-Arsi and HF-Local crosses (Kiwuwa et al 1983). Abdinasir (2000) reported 1547 kg per lactation for 25-62.5% exotic blood levels of Arsi-Holstein Friesian, which is lower than the present result. On the other hand, Abdinasir (2000) reported higher lactation milk yield for >75% Arsi-HF crossbred, which is higher than the current study with the same blood levels and breeds. The tendency of increasing lactation milk yield with no significant difference as exotic blood levels increased was consistent with Kiwuwa et al (1983) and Bee et al (2006) in Ethiopia and Sudan, respectively. However, according to Msanga et al (2000) and Amasaib et al (2011) 62.5% exotic blood level was superior in total lactation milk yield than any crossbred.

According to Preston and Murgueitio (1992) if total performance is taken into account (fertility, survival, growth rate and milk yield), animals of an intermediate level of European exotic blood levels are likely to be superior. This is further supported by Syrstad (1996) who reported that optimum point of upgrading lies between 50% and 75% Bos taurus breeds for milk production. As the level of exotic inheritance increased towards 100%, the problem of high mortality and reduced fertility increased (Bee et al 2006). The absence of differences in lactation milk yield among different blood levels might be due to deterioration of heterosis effect of back crossing. Cunningham (1991) indicated that the possible explanation for the low productivity of F2 is the idea that blocks of genes giving favorable epistatic effects in the parental breeds and the F1 may be broken up in the F2 and subsequent generations.

Million and Tadelle (2003), Million et al (2010), Kefena et al (2011) and Gebeyehu (1999), reported significant effect of parity on lactation and daily milk yield, which agrees with the current result. Peak lactation milk yield was reported at 6th parity (Million et al 2010), 4th - 5th parity (Goshu and Mekonnen 1997) and 3 rd - 8th parity (Kefena et al 2011) for different breeds in Ethiopia. A rapid declining trend in adjusted lactation milk yield was observed at 6th+, which agrees with Mackinnon et al (1996) for crossbreds of Ayrshire, Brown Swiss and Sahiwal in Kenya and Sattar et al (2005) for HF cows in Pakistan. Moreover, Madani et al (2008) reported peak lactation milk yield at 2nd - 3rd, which agrees with this study. Cows in 6th+ parity were no longer better producers' compared with those in their 2nd and 3 rd parity. This may be partly explained by highest milk production capacity coupled with greater feed intake in intermediate cows than young ones and similarly due to more number of secretory cells at intermediate ages and due to inexperienced lactation stress in young animals (Bee et al 2006). The decline in milk production at 6th+ parity may be due to turnover of secretory cells, with higher numbers dying compared to the newly produced active secretory cells (Epaphras et al (2004).

Lactation length

Results of adjusted lactation milk yield and days in milk by blood level and parity are presented in Table 2. Statistically there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference among blood levels in adjusted lactation milk yield and days in milk. A lower (p < 0.05) value in adjusted lactation milk yield was recorded for parity 6th+ than that of second and third, while the other parities were intermediate. There was no significant (p > 0.05) difference among parities in lactation length.

Table 2. Least square means (± S.E.) of adjusted milk yield per lactation and lactation length by blood level,
and parity for Arsi-Holstein–Friesian crossbred cows at Assela Model Agriculture Enterprise Dairy Farm

Fixed variables

No

Adjusted lactation
milk yield (kg)

Lactation
length (days)

Overall

855

2155±33

314±1

Blood levels:

NS

NS

50%

77

2025±103

312±3

62.5-68.75%

154

2105±74

317±2

75%

151

2129±75

313±2

>75%

473

2227±46

313±2

Parity:

*

NS

1

177

2137±77ab

324±3

2

144

2309±81b

308.±3

3

120

2334±88b

300±3

4

109

2134±91ab

312±3

5

89

2141±98ab

318±3

6+

216

1978±64a

318±2

Within column least square means not carrying the same superscripts are significantly different,
NS= not significance, * =significant (p<0.05).

The average lactation length in the current study was comparable with the study by Asaminew and Eyasu (2009) and Adebabay (2009), who reported 303 days. However, it was lower than the findings of Kefena et al (2011) (333 days), Zelalem (1999) (351 days) and Kiwuwa et al (1983) (350 days) for Zebu-Friesian crossbred in Ethiopia. On the other hand, days in milk of 279 days, 242 days, 292 days, and 247 days were reported by Million and Tadelle (2003), Belay et al (2012), Sattar et al (2004) and Sattar et al (2005) for Barca, Zebu-HF crossbred in Ethiopia, Jersey in Pakistan and HF in Pakistan, respectively, which is shorter than the present study. The variation might be due to variation in management of the animal, breeds, and the models were used.

According to Addisu et al (2010) animals which gave birth in dry season had longer lactation length than that of animals which gave birth in wet season, which is not consistent with the present result. On the other hand, Amasaib et al (2011) reported insignificant effects of season on lactation length, which agree with the current finding. The variations among year in lactation length were reported by Kefena et al (2011), Addisu et al (2010) and Kiwuwa et al (1983), which is consistent with the present result. The variation in milk production performance over years may not only be caused by inter-annual random change of the climatic factors but also due to management changes (Aynalem et al 2008).

The level of exotic blood level had no effect on lactation length, which agrees with Yahya et al (2011) who reported insignificance effects of exotic blood level on days in milk for cows with 50%, 62.5 and 87.5%. On the other hand, they reported significant effects of exotic blood level on days in milk for cows with 25%, 75% and 100% for Kenana- Friesian crossbred cattle in central Sudan. In another study, lactation length of 272 days was reported for local Arsi breeds (Kiwuwa et al., 1983), which is shorter than the four blood levels in the current study. In addition, Kiwuwa et al (1983) and MOA and FINNIDA (1996) reported longer lactation length for 50% exotic blood levels of Arsi-HF crossbred than the present study. Moreover, Abdinasir (2000) reported longer lactation length for 25-62.5% and >75% exotic blood levels of Arsi-HF crossbred than the present study.

The lack of effect of parity on days in milk is not consistent with the finding of Kefena et al (2011), Sattar et al (2005) and Amasaib et al. (2011). Different authors reported maximum days in milk at different points for different breeds. Kefena et al (2011) and Sattar et al (2005) reported longer lactation length at the first parity, whereas, Amasaib et al (2011) reported longer lactation length at the second parity. The differences reported in several studies may be due to the differences in environment, management and breeds.

Birth and weaning weight

Table 3 summarizes the effects of sex and blood levels on birth weight and weaning weight. The overall least square means values of birth and weaning weight were 34 and 72 kg, respectively. The birth weight for male was higher (p < 0.05) than that of females. The weaning weight for female was higher (p < 0.05) than that of male.

Animals with 50% exotic blood levels had lower birth weight than those animals with 62.5-68.75% exotic blood levels, while, animals with 75% and >75% exotic blood levels were intermediate. Animals with 62.5-68.75%, and >75% exotic blood levels had higher weaning weight than those animals 50% with blood levels, while, 75% exotic blood levels.

Table 3. Least square means (± S.E.) of birth weight and weaning weight by sex and blood level
for Arsi-Holstein–Friesian crossbred Cows at Assela Model Agriculture Enterprise Dairy Farm

Fixed variables

No

Birth
weight (kg)

No

Weaning
weight (kg)

Overall:

473

34±1

242

72±2

Sex:

*

*

Female

224

33±1

63

77±4

Male

249

35±1

179

66±2

Blood levels:

*

*

50%

82

27±1a

44

62±3a

62.5-68.75

24

39±1b

6

80±8b

75%

60

35±1ab

42

68±2ab

>75%

307

36±0ab

150

76±1b

Within column least square means not carrying the same superscripts are significantly different.
* =significant (p<0.05)
.

The overall mean birth weight of calves seen in this study was higher than birth weight of Boran and Boran-HF crossbred (28.2 kg) and Jersey (22.87 kg) by Aynalem et al (2011) and Habtamu et al (2010), respectively. Weaning weight of calves in the current study was higher than Boran-HF crossbred (55.36 kg) reported by Aynalem et al (2011), but lower than that of Jersey (108.88 kg) as reported by Habtamu et al (2010). Aynalem et al (2011) reported 26.0 kg birth weight for 50% Boran-HF, which is comparable with the current result. The same authors reported lower birth weight for 62.5, 75 and 87.5% Boran-HF crossbreds than the current result. Aynalem et al (2011) reported lower weaning weight for Boran, ½ Boran ½ HF, 3/8 Boran-5/8 HF), ¼ Boran ¾ HF and 1/8 Boran 7/8 HF than the current blood levels. The small weaning weight might be due to poor post management. According to Mukassa-Mugerwa et al (1991) feeding higher quantity of milk during preweaning resulted in better growth.

The difference in birth weight between sexes in this study was inconsistent with the finding of Addisu et al (2010) under partial suckling system at Andassa Livestock Research Centre. Habtamu et al (2010) reported that male calves were heavier than female calves at birth, which is agreed with this study. The variation among blood levels in birth weight might be because of the heterosis effect (Aynalem 2006). Moreover, in mammals, growth is influenced by the genes of the individual, environment provided by the dam and other environmental effects (Albuquerque and Meyer 2001).

Birth weight of 50% blood levels was comparable with the crossbred of ½ Holstein ½ Arsi, ½ Holstein ½ Zebu, and ½ Exotic ½ Arsi, while higher than ½Jersey ½Arsi crossbred (Kiwuwa et al 1983). In addition, Kiwuwa et al (1983) reported lower birth weight for ¾ Friesian ¼ Arsi, ¾ Friesian ¼ Zebu, ¾ Exotic ¼ Arsi and ¾ Friesian ¼ local crossbred than this study.

The variation between sexes on weaning weight was reported by Habtamu et al (2010). They reported that male calves are heavier than female calves at weaning time, which is not consistent with the present study. This might be attributed to different physiological processes in the two sexes. Their differences in growth increased with age implying that sex effects are more pronounced with age after puberty (Hailu et al 2008). Small weaning weight in male calves might be due to poor postpartum feeding and more attention for female calves since they are raised for herd replacement.


Conclusion and recommendation


References

Abdinasir I B 2000 Smallholder dairy production and dairy technology adoption in the mixed farming system in Arsi highland, Ethiopia. PhD thesis, Humboldt University of Berlin, Department of Animal Breeding in the Tropics and Subtropics. Germany.

Addisu Bitew, Mengistie Taye, Adebabay Kebede, Getinet Mekuriaw, Asaminew Tassew, Tezera Mulugeta and Gebeyehu Goshu 2010 Milk yield and calf growth performance of cattle under partial suckling system at Andassa Livestock Research Centre, North West Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #136. Retrieved September 4, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/8/bite22136.htm

Adebabay Kebede 2009 Characterization of Milk Production Systems, Marketing and On-farm Evaluation of the Effect of Feed Supplementation on Milk Yield and Milk Composition of Cows at Bure District, Ethiopia. MSc. thesis submitted to Bahir Dar University. 14 pp.

Albuquerque L G and K Meyer 2001 Estimates of covariance functions for growth from birth to 630 days of age in Nelore cattle. Journal of Animal Sciences. 79: 2776-2789.

Amasaib E O, Fadel-Elseed A M, Mahala A G. and Fadlelmoula A A 2011 Seasonal and parity effects on some performance and reproductive characteristics of crossbred dairy cows raised under tropical conditions of the Sudan. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 23, Article #78. Retrieved July 12, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/amas23078.htm

Asaminew Tassew and Eyasu Seifu 2009 Smallholder dairy system and emergency of dairy cooperatives in Bahir dar Zuria and Mecha Woredas, northern, Ethiopia. World Journal of Dairy and Food Sciences. 4 (2): 185-192.

Aynalem Haile 2006 Genetic and economic analysis of Ethiopian Boran cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian in central Ethiopia. PhD thesis. National dairy research institute (I.C.A.R) karnal-132001 (Haryana), India. 197 pp.

Aynalem Haile, B K Joshi, Workneh Ayalew, Azage Tegegne and A Singh 2008 Genetic evaluation of Ethiopian Boran cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian in central Ethiopia: milk production traits. Animal. 3 (4): 486–493.

Aynalem Haile, Workneh Ayalew, Noah Kebede, Tadelle Dessie, and Azage Tegegne 2011 Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production. IPMS (Improving Productivity and Market Success) of Ethiopian Farmers Project Working Paper 26. Nairobi, Kenya, ILRI.

Bee J K A, Msanga Y N and Kavana P 2006 Lactation yield of crossbred dairy cattle under farmer management in Eastern coast of Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 18, Article #23. Retrieved June 19, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/2/bee18023.htm

CSA Central Statistical Agency 2008 Agricultural sample survey 2007/08. Volume II. Report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

CSA Central Statistical Agency 2011 Agricultural sample survey 2010/11. Volume II. Report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Cunningham E P 1991 Breeding programs for improved dairy production in tropical climates. In: Animal Husbandry in Warm Climates. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Animal Husbandry in Warm Climates. EAAP publication, no. 55, 25-27 October 1990, Viterbo, Italy.

Demeke Sendros, Neser F W C and Schoeman S J 2004b Estimates of genetic parameters for Boran, Friesian, and crosses of Friesian and Jersey with the Boran cattle in the tropical highlands of Ethiopia: milk production traits and cow weight. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 121:163-175.

Epaphras A, Karimuribo E D and Msellem S N 2004 Effect of season and parity on lactation of crossbred Ayrshire cows reared under coastal tropical climate in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, Volume 16 Article #16042 Retrieved July 10, 2004 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/6/epap16042.htm

Gebeyehu Goshu 1999 Reproductive and productive performance of Friesian-Boran crossbred cattle at Cheffa state farm, Wollo, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis. Alemaya University of Agriculture, Alemaya, Ethiopia.

Gebeyehu Goshu 2005 Breeding efficiency, lifetime lactation and calving performance of Friesian-Boran crossbred cows at Cheffa farm, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 17, Article #73. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd17/7/gosh17073.htm

Goshu Mekonnen and Hailemariam Mekonen 1997 Milk production of Fogera cattle and their crosses with Friesian at Gonder, Northern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agriculture Sciences. (EJAS). 16 (2): 61-74.

Habtamu Lemma, Kelay Belihu and Dessie Shiferaw 2010 Study on the reproductive performance of Jersey cows at Wolayta Sodo dairy farm, Southern Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, P.O.Box 34, Debre-Zeit, Ethiopia.

Hailu Dadi, G Duguma, B Shelima, T Fayera, M Tadesse, T Woldu and T A Tucho 2008 Non-genetic factors influencing post-weaning growth and reproductive performances of Arsi-Bale goats. Livest. Res. Rur. Develop. Article #114. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/7/dadi20114.htm

Hirooka H and Bhuttyan A K F H 1995 Additive and heterosis effect on milk yield and birth weight from crossbreeding experiments between Holstein–Friesian and the local breed. American Journal of Animal Sciences. 8: 295–301.

Holloway G, Nicholson C, Delgado C, Staal S and Ehui S 2000 How to make a milk market: A case study from the Ethiopian highlands. Socio-economic and Policy Research Working Paper28. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. 28 pp.

Jonson H D 1991 The lactating cow in various ecosystem: Environmental effects on its productivity, pp.9-21. In A. Speedy and R. Sansoucy (eds.). Feeding Dairy Cows in the Tropics. Proceedings of the FAO expert consultation held in Bangkok, Thailand, 7-11-july 1989. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

KARC Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center 2008 Annual report of KARC, Asella, Ethiopia. 6 pp.

Kefena Effa, Zewdie Wondatir, Tadelle Dessie and Aynalem Haile 2011 Genetic and environmental trends in the long-term dairy cattle genetic improvement programmes in the central tropical highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology Vol. 5(6): 96-104 pp, June 2011. https://academicjournals.org/JCAB

Kiwuwa G H, Trail J C M, Kurtu M Y, Worku, G, Anderson F M and Durkin J 1983 Crossbred dairy cattle productivity in Arsi Region, Ethiopia. International Livestock center for Africa (ILCA). Research report No. 11, 1-29 http://www.ilri.org/InfoServ/Webpub/Fulldocs/X5529e/X5529e00.htm

Leng R A 1991 Feeding strategies for improving milk production of dairy animals managed by small farmers in the tropics, pp. 82 – 104. In A. Speedy and R. Sansoucy (eds.). Feeding Dairy Cows in the Tropics. Proceedings of the FAO expert consultation held in Bangkok, Thailand. 7–11 July 1989. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Mackinnon M J, Thorpe W and Baker R L 1996 Sources of genetic variation for milk production in crossbred herd in the tropics. Animal Science. 62: 5-16.

Madani T Yakhlef H and Marie M 2008 Effect of age at first calving on lactation and reproduction of dairy cows reared in semi arid region of Algeria. Volume 20, Article #92. Retrieved August 6, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/6/mada20092.htm

Mihret Ayenew 2006 Poverty and Urban Government Institutions; ed. Desalegn Rahmewto. Some aspects of Poverty in Ethiopia. Forum for Social Studies, Addis Ababa.

Million Tadesse and Tadelle Dessie 2003 Milk production performance of Zebu, Holstein Friesian and their crosses in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 15 (3). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/3/Tade153.htm

Million Tadesse, Thiengtham J, Pinyopummin A and Prasanpanich S 2010 Productive and reproductive performance of Holstein Friesian dairy cows in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #34. Retrieved June 19, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/2/tade22034.htm

Msanga Y N, Bryant M J, Rutam I B, Minja F N and Zylstra L 2000 Effect of Environmental factors and the proportion of Holstein blood on milk yield and lactation length of crossbred dairy cattle on smallholder farms in northeast Tanzania. Tropical Animal health and Production. 32 (1): 23 – 31.

Mukassa-Mugrewa E, A Tegegne, T Mesfin and Y Teklu 1991 Reproductive efficiency of Bos indicus (zebu) cows under artificial insemination management in Ethiopia. Animal Reproduction Science. 24:63-72.

Pratt A N, Staal S J and Jabbar M 2008 Dairy development for the resource poor. Part II: Kenya and Ethiopian dairy development case studies. PPLPI (Pro-poor Livestock Policy Initiative) Working Paper No. 44–2. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya.

Preston T R and Murgueitio E 1992 Strategy for sustainable livestock production in the tropics. CONDRIT Ltd, Cali, Colombia, 2nd Edition.

Sattar A, Mirza R H and Latif M 2004 Studies on some production traits in Jersey cows. Journal of Animal and Plant Science. 14: (In press).

Sattar A, Mirza R H, Niazi A A K and Latif 2005 Productive and reproductive performance of Holstein Frisian cows in Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 25(2):75-81.

Sendros Demeke and Tesfaye Kumssa 1998 Factors to be considered in formulation of livestock breeding policy, pp. 26-35. In Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP). Addis Ababa.

Syrstad O 1996 Dairy cattle crossbreeding in the tropics. Livestock Production Science. 23: 97-10.

Trail J C M and Gregory K E 1981 Sahiwal cattle an evaluation of their potential contribution to milk and beef production in Africa. International Livestock Centre for Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. http://www.ilri.org/InfoServ/Webpub/fulldocs/X5538E/X5538E00.HTM

Yahya AKh, El-Tetraifi M and Siddig F S 2011 Performance of Kenana × Friesian cross-bred cattle in central Sudan. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research. 1(6): 274-279. Journal homepage: http://www.ojafr.ir/main/.

Zelalem Yilma 1999 Smallholder Milk Production Systems and Processing Techniques in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. MSc. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. 15 pp.


Received 4 April 2019; Accepted 23 April 2019; Published 4 June 2019

Go to top