Livestock Research for Rural Development 29 (4) 2017 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Effect of biochar and biodigester effluent on yield of Taro (Colocasia esculenta) foliage

Bounmay Bouaravong, Nguyen Nhut Xuan Dung1 and T R Preston2

Plant Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Savannaket University, Savannnaket province, Lao PDR
bbounmay@yahoo.com
1 Cantho University, Vietnam
2 Centro para la Investigación en Sistemas Sostenibles de Producción Agropecuaria (CIPAV), Carrera 25 No 6-62 Cali, Colombia

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to evaluate effects ef soil amendment with biochar and biodigester effluent on biomass yield of Taro.  In the first experimemt, five levels of biochar (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 kg/m2) were applied to Taro grown in 3*3m plots according to a completely randomized (CRD) design with 4 replicates. All plots were fertilized with biodigester effluent at the rate of 50 kg  N/ha. There were linear increases in yield of Taro leaves and petioles, and in their content of crude protein, when biochar was applied to the soil at levels from 0 to 2 kg/m2. Soil fertility as measured by pH, water-holding capacity and nitrogen content was increased linearly according to the level of biochar.

In the second experiment, five levels of biodigester effluent  (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 kg N/ha) were applied to to Taro grown in 1*1m plots that had been amended with 2 kg/m2 of biochar. Applying biodigester effluent at levels up to 100 kg N/ha resulted in linear increases in biomass yield and in crude protein content of leaves and petioles and to increased soil fertility as measured by pH, water-holding capacity and nitrogen content.

Key words: nitrogen, organic carbon, organic matter, pH, soil N, water holding capacity


Introduction

The discovery in the Brazilian Amazon of the long-term effects of carbonized biomass on soil fertility (Glaser et al 2001, 2002) has given rise to worldwide interest in the potential role of carbonized biomass (biochar) application to soils as a means of improving soil fertility and sequestering atmospheric carbon (Lehmann 2007).

The integration of soil amendment with biochar and use of biodigester effluent as fertilizer is especially relevant in poor tropical countries such as Lao PDR.

Hypothesis


Materials and methods

Experimental design:

There were two experiments:

Experiment 1: Effect of level of biochar on yield of taro foliage and on soil fertility
Location and Duration

The experiment was conducted in the farm of the Centre for Developing Sustainable Agriculture, Nasae Village, Keoudom District, Vientiane Province, Lao PDR, from November 2015 to February 2016.

Experimental design

Five levels of biochar (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 kg/m2) were compared in a completely randomized (CRD) design with 4 replicates.

Procedure

There were 20 plots each measuring 3*3m, with 2m between individual plots. Biochar produced from rice husk was added to the top 20 cm of the soil. Taro was planted from suckers approximately 20 cm in length including the roots. Thirty-six suckers were planted in each plot.

Effluent was taken from a biodigester charged with pig manure (Photo 1) and applied at 50 kg N/ha, divided equally in 3 occasions at 30, 60 and 90 days’ All plots were irrigated twice weekly in amounts determined from measurements of soil moisture.

Measurements
Plant biomass

The taro (leaves and petioles) were harvested at 30, 60, 90 and 120 days. Fresh biomass of leaves and petioles was recored and samples taken for DM and crude protein estimation.

Soil analysis

Samples of soil were taken before planting and at 120 days after the taro was harvested. Determinations were made of pH, water-holding capacity, nitrogen, organic matter and organic carbon, using standard methods (AOAC 2000).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by the General Linear Model in the ANOVA program of the Minitab (2016) software. Sources of variation in the model were: levels of biochar, replicates and error.


Results

Biomass yields

The yield of leaves, petioles and total foliage were increased with curvilinear trends as the level of biochar in the soil was increased (Table 1; Figure 1).

Table 1. Mean values for DM yield of leaves and petioles of Taro with increasing levels of biochar

Level of biochar, kg/m2

SEM

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Leaf

204

389

432

460

499

2.95

Petiole

111

176

190

197

203

0.87

Leaf + petiole

315

565

622

656

702

3.13



Figure 1. Effect of biochar on DM yield of leaf and petiole of the Taro

The percentages of crude protein in the DM of the leaves and petioles were increased with linear trends as the level of biochar added to the soil was increased (Table 2; Figure 2)

Table 2. Mean values for crude protein in DM in leaves and petioles of Taro with 5 levels of biochar

Level of biochar, kg/m2

SEM

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Leaf

16.0

16.4

17.0

17.6

18.6

0.051

Petiole

5.97

6.92

7.50

8.27

9.80

0.045



Figure 2. Effect of biochar on crude protein percentage in the DM of leaf and petiole of the Taro

All criteria of soil fertility were improved by addition of biochar (Table 3; Figures 3 to 7)

Table 3. Mean values of pH, water-holding capacity (WHC), nitrogen, organic matter and organic carbon in soil that received increasing levels of biochar

Level of biochar, kg/m2

SEM

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

pH

5.04

5.39

5.47

5.52

5.67

0.0050

WHC

40.8

47.0

50.4

52.8

55.2

0.295

N in soil, %

0.093

0.115

0.145

0.147

0.214

0.0011

OM in soil,%

1.92

2.15

2.38

2.44

2.70

0.0088

Organic C, %

1.12

1.25

1.38

1.42

1.57

0.0051



Figure 3. Effect of biochar on soil pH


Figure 4. Effect of biochar on water-holding capacity


Figure 5. Effect of biochar on nitrogen content of the soil


Figure 6. Effect of biochar on OM in soil


Figure 7. Effect of biochar on organic carbon in soil


Discussion

The positive effects of biochar on the yield and protein content of leaves and petioles of Taro are similar to those reported for responses to biochar in other vegetables such as Celery cabbage (Brassica chinensis var), Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis), Mustard green ( Brassica juncea) and Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) (Chhay et al 2013).

The increase in soil nitrogen when biochar was added to the soils is corroborated by similar findings reported by Insixiengmai et al (2017) when biochar was added to soils growing sugar cane. These major increases in soil nitrogen could be due to increased fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by soil microbes, stimulated by the improved habitat afforded by biofilms supported by biochar. The other possibility is that the biochar reduced emissions of nitrous oxides from nitrogenous compounds in the soil as has been shown for effects of biochar in soils growing sugar cane (Quirk et 2012).

Experiment 2: Effect of level of effluent on yield of taro foliage
Location

The experiment was conducted in the same site as Experiment 1, from February to August 2016.

Experimental design

The treatments, arranged in a CRD design with 4 replications, were levels of biodigester effluent of 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 kg N/ha applied over 120 days to plots growing Taro. All the plots received biochar at the rate of 2 kg/m2.

Procedure

There were 20 plots each measuring 1*1m, with 20m between individual plots. Biochar produced from rice husk was added to the top 20 cm of the soil. Taro was planted from suckers approximately 20 cm in length including the roots. Four suckers were planted in each plot.

Effluent was taken from a biodigester charged with pig manure (Photo 1) and applied at rates to give 0, 25, 50, 75, 100 kg N/ha, divided equally in 4 occasions at 25, 50, 75 and 100 days. All plots were irrigated twice weekly in amounts determined from measurements of soil moisture.

Measurements
Plant biomass

The taro (leaves and petioles) were harvested at 30, 60, 90 and 120 days. Fresh biomass of leaves and petioles was weighed and samples taken for DM and crude protein estimation.

Soil analysis

Samples of soil were taken before planting and at 120 days after the taro was harvested. Determinations were made of pH, water-holding capacity, nitrogen, organic matter and organic carbon, using standard methods (AOAC 2000).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by the General Linear Model in the ANOVA program of the Minitab (2016) software. Sources of variation in the model were: levels of effluent, replicates and error.

Photo 1. The tubular plastic plug-flow biodigester charged with pig manure
(protected from UV radiation with water melon)


Results

There were linear increases in yield of leaves and petioles and of total biomass as the level of effluent N was increased from cero to 100 kg N/ha (Table 4; Figure 8)

Table 4. Mean values for DM yield (g/m2) of leaves and petioles of Taro with 5 levels of effluent N

Level of effluent N, kg/ha

SEM

0

25

50

75

100

Leaf

219

268

284

296

316

4.8

Petiole

389

519

583

663

710

4.1

Leaf + petiole

609

788

867

960

1027

6.1



Figure 8. Effect of biodigester effluent on DM yield of Taro

The crude protein in the leaves and petioles of the taro increased linearly with increasing application of biodigester effluent over the range 0 to 100 kg N/ha (Table 5; Figure 9).

Table 5. Mean values for crude protein in DM of leaves and petioles of Taro with increasing levels of biodigester effluent N,

Level of effluent N, kg/ha

SEM

0

25

50

75

100

Leaf

15.9

16.3

16.9

17.6

18.5

0.044

Petiole

5.96

6.92

7.50

8.26

9.79

0.050



Figure 9. Effect of biodigester effluent on crude protein contant of taro leaves and petioles

Soil fertility parameters were all improved by application of biodigester effluent (Table 6; Figures 10 to 13). Major increases were in pH (from 5.4 to 6.8) and N content of the soil (from 0.08 to 0.38%) as the effluent N was increased from 0 to 100 kg N/ha.

Table 6. Mean values for soil parameters with increasing levels of biodigester effluent N

Level of effluent N, kg/ha

SEM

0

25

50

75

100

pH

5.40

5.63

5.96

6.54

6.75

0.0128

WHC

52.5

54.0

52.3

54.4

61.1

0.650

N% in Soil

0.077

0.125

0.186

0.210

0.379

0.0011

Organic C%

1.88

1.89

1.89

1.90

1.92

0.0084



Figure 10. Effect of biodigester effluent on soil pH


Figure 11. Effect of biodigester effluent on WHC


Figure 12. Effect of biodigester effluent on nitrogen in soil


Discussion

The linear improvements in yield and nutritional quality of the taro leaves and petioles resulting from application of biodigester effluent confirm the value in smallholder farming systems of recycling animal manure through biodigesters. Biochar was applied to all plots thus its role in the improvement brought about by fertilization with biodiester effluent cannot be evaluated.


Conclusions


Acknowledgement

This research was done by the senior author as part of the requirements for the MSc degree in Animal Production "Improving Livelihood and Food Security of the people in Lower Mekong Basin through Climate Change Mitigation" in Cantho University, Vietnam. The authors would like to express their appreciation to: the MEKARN program funded by SIDA project for providing the opportunity and budget to carry out the study; the Agriculture Research Center (ARC) for conducting analysis of soil and plant; the Study Centre and Developing Sustainable Agriculture for conducting of the experiment, We gratefully thank Maria Elena Gomez, Mr. Pisa Phayashan and Mr. Soulideth Phayashan for their help in facilitating the execution of the experiment.


References

Chhay T, Vor S, Borin K and Preston T R 2013 : Effect of different levels of biochar on the yield and nutritive value of Celery cabbage (Brassica chinensis var), Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis), Mustard green (Brassica juncea) and Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 25, Article #8. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/1/chha25008.htm

Insixiengmai Chittakone, Nguyen Nhut Xuan  Dung and Preston T R 2017 Growth and yield of sugar cane planted from node cuttings or stems and with the soil amended with biochar.  Livestock Research for Rural Development. (submitted)

Glaser B, Haumaier L, Guggenberger G and Zech W 2001 “The 'Terra Preta' phenomenon: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics”, Naturwissenschaften 88: 1

Glaser B, Lehmann J and Zech W 2002 ‘Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal –Are view’ Biology and Fertility of Soils 35, 219–230.

Lehmann J 2007 A handful of carbon. Nature 447 143-144 http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/publ/Nature%20447,%20143-144,%202007%20Lehmann.pdf

Quirk R G, Zwieten Van L , Kimber S., Downie A, Morris S and Rust J 2012 Utilization of biochar in sugarcane and sugar-Industry management. Sugar Tech, October 2012, 14(4):321-326).


Received 20 February 2017; Accepted 28 February 2017; Published 1 April 2017

Go to top