Livestock Research for Rural Development 27 (1) 2015 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Silage characteristics and preference of sheep for wet brewer’s grain ensiled with maize cob

T O Ososanya and O A Olorunnisomo

Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
tososanya85@gmail.com

Abstract

In order to meet the shortfall in feed supply and provide adequate nutrition for sheep during the dry season, wet brewer’s grain (WBG) was ensiled with 0, 10, 20, and 30 % of crushed maize cob (MC). The physical characteristics, pH and chemical composition of the silage mixtures were determined at 21 days of ensiling. Acceptability and preference of sheep among the silage mixtures were determined in a cafeteria feeding trial using eighteen West African dwarf (WAD) sheep. The experimental design adopted was the completely randomized design.

 

The colour, smell and texture of the mixtures showed that all silages had acceptable physical attributes. The pH of silage varied from 3.40 – 3.80, indicating that the silage mixtures were adequately fermented. Silage scores however revealed that the best physical attributes were attained at 20 % inclusion of maize cob to WBG. Dry matter (DM) content of silage was 26.88, 31.44, 36.69, 43.50% while crude protein (CP) content was 23.44, 19.11, 14.00, and 12.00% for silage with 0, 10, 20 and 30% of maize cob respectively. Neutral detergent fibre increased from 40.33 - 62.67 % and acid detergent from 25.00 – 39.67% with increasing level of maize cob in the mixture. The coefficient of preference (CoP) and percent preference showed that WBG silage with 10% MC was more acceptable and preferred by sheep than other silage mixtures. While physical attributes of silage showed that the optimum level of MC inclusion was 20%,  animal preference indicate that this level was less acceptable to sheep.  Sheep may require more time to adapt to higher levels of MC in the silage mixture.

Keywords: acceptability, agro-industrial waste, crop residue, dry season feed, small ruminants


Introduction

Small ruminants like sheep and goats form an integral part of rural livelihoods in the southwest of Nigeria where majority of households keep either sheep or goat for subsistence purposes. A serious constraint of livestock production in this region is inadequate year-round supply of quality feeds (Muhammad et al 2008). Scarcity of forage during the dry season and low energy density of available forage are major factors limiting the productivity of these animals (Olorunnisomo 2010). The dry season is characterized by weight loss, reduced milk yield and high reproductive failures among livestock (Malau – Aduli et al 2003).  These challenges have a negative impact on the quality and amount of animal protein available for human consumption in this region. A judicious use of locally available feed resources like crop residues and agro-industrial by-products can improve the nutrition of these animals and boost livestock productivity in these parts. Agro industrial by products and crop residues are available in appreciable quantities and provides opportunity to maximize livestock production from feed resources not utilized by man (Preston and Leng 2009). Maize cobs and wet brewers’ grain are of little commercial value and no dietary importance to human beings; hence they can be utilized by ruminants and converted into animal products at little cost.

 

Dehydrated brewers grain fed to lambs at 40% of the diet has been shown to result in good growth performance, high feed conversion and fatter carcasses (Bovolenta et al 1998). In other tropical and subtropical areas, higher levels of dried brewer’s grains were successfully incorporated into sheep diets without depressing performance or digestibility (Baghdassar et al 1986, Aguilera-Soto et al 2007, Cabral Filho et al 2007). Wet brewers’ grain can be ensiled and stored for long periods without altering its nutritive value for ruminant animals (Geron et al 2008). Although maize cob has very little nutritive value, it has been used as an absorbent in silage-making, fibre source and bulking material in ruminant diets (Ibhaze et al 2014).

 

The objective of this study was to evaluate the physical characteristics, chemical composition and acceptability of wet brewer’s grain ensiled with different proportions of maize cob by West African dwarf sheep in the southwest of Nigeria.


Materials and Methods

Location

 

This study was conducted at the sheep unit of the Teaching and Research Farm, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria (70 27’N and 300 45’N) with a mean temperature of 27 oC and mean annual rainfall of 1350cm.

 

Treatments

 

Experimental treatments corresponded to silage made with wet brewer’s grain and four levels of crushed maize cobs as follows:

-          Wet brewer’s grain + 0% maize cobs (MC0)

-          Wet brewer’s grain + 10% maize cobs (MC10)

-          Wet brewer’s grain + 20% maize cobs (MC20)

-          Wet brewer’s grain + 30% maize cobs (MC30)

 

Silage preparation and evaluation

 

Wet brewers’ grain was obtained from Nigeria Breweries Plc. Ibadan while maize cobs were collected from maize producers around Ibadan metropolis. The maize cobs were crushed in a hammer mill with a mesh of 6mm diameter. Wet brewers’ grain and maize cob were mixed in the proportion specified above and packed inside 120L plastic drums, compressed, weighted with a sand bag and covered with a plastic lid for the acceptability trial. Another set of silage was made inside 4L mini plastic silo for laboratory analysis. Samples of silage were taken from each mini-silo after 21days for physical characteristics, pH and chemical composition. The appearance, smell, texture and pH of the silage were judged by a 15-man panel that had experience with silage-making using a 0 – 5 scale as follows:

0

1

2

3

4

5

Observation

Very bad

Bad

Going bad

Moderate

Good

Excellent

Colour

Very dark

Dark

Dark Brown

Deep brown

Brown

Light brown

Smell

Offensive

Poor

Almost pleasant

Fairly pleasant

Pleasant

Very pleasant

Texture

Slimy

Very soft

Soft

Moderately firm

Firm

Very firm

pH

>6.5

6.1 – 6.5

5.6 - 6.0

4.6 – 5.5

4.0 – 4.5

<4.0

Proximate composition of silage was determined following the general procedures of AOAC (1995) while detergent fibres were determined by procedures of van Soest et al (1991). Dry matter concentration in the silage was determined using a forced draught oven at 65oC and values obtained were corrected for loss of volatile compounds by multiplying with the correction factor of 1.056 (Fox and Fenderson 1978).

 

Acceptability study

 

Eighteen West African dwarf sheep (11. 2 ± 1.92kg) were used to evaluate the free choice intake of wet brewers’ grain ensiled with different levels of maize cobs in a cafeteria style. The animals were housed together in a free stall with dwarf walls and concrete floors covered with wood shavings. All the animals were pre-conditioned to the experimental diets for a period of 4 days after which the animals were offered 4kg each (wet basis) of experimental diets daily for a period of 10 days. Fresh water was also offered daily on a free choice basis. Intake of silage was measured 2 hours after it was offered by deducting remnants from the amount of feed served and animals were allowed to graze for the rest of the day. The coefficient of preference (CoP) was calculated as the ratio of individual silage intake to average intake of all the silages while percentage of preference was calculated as the ratio of individual intake to total intake multiplied by 100. Silage was considered acceptable when the CoP is greater than one while ranking was based on percentage of preference.  

 

Experimental design/statistical analysis

 

The experimental design adopted for this study was the completely randomized design. Data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance and significant means were separated by Duncan’s multiple range tests using the procedures of SAS (1995).    


Results and Discussion

The physical characteristics and pH of the silages are presented in Table 1. Addition of maize cob to wet brewer’s grain (MC10, MC20 and MC30) changed the colour from brown to light brown. This was due to the white colour of maize cob which had a dilution effect on the brown colour of WBG.  All the silages prepared had a pleasant and acceptable smell; however, smell of MC10 was judged to be more pleasant than others. The texture of MC0 which had no WBG was moderately firm while others (MC10, MC20 and MC30) with some level of maize cob were firm to very firm, showing that addition of maize cob to wet brewer’s grain enhanced the texture of the mixture. This was due to the high level of structural fibres in maize cob which improved the general structure of the silage.  Maize cob as a fibre source was also expected to enhance rumination in sheep fed these diets (Ibhaze et al 2014). The pH of the silages ranged from 3.40 – 3.80. These were within the acceptable range for good silage in the tropics (Bilal 2009, Nhan et al 2009). The pH of the ensiled mixtures increased with higher inclusion of maize cob. This suggests that the soluble carbohydrates responsible for fermentation of the silage were supplied by WBG rather than maize cob. 

Table 1: Physical characteristics and pH of wet brewers’ grain and maize cob silage at 21 days of ensiling

Parameter       

MC0   

MC10 

MC20 

MC30

Colour

Brown

Light Brown

Light Brown

Light Brown

Smell  

Pleasant

Very Pleasant

Pleasant

Pleasant

Texture           

Moderately firm

Firm

Very firm            

Very firm

pH

3.40

3.50

3.50

3.80

MC0: Wet Brewers’ gain alone, MC10: Wet brewers gain + 10% maize cobs, MC20: Wet brewers gain + 20% maize cobs, MC30: Wet brewers gain + 30% maize cobs

Silage score which was based on physical attributes and pH of the silages is presented in Table 2.  The score for colour and texture of silage increased as the proportion of maize cob in the mixture increased whereas smell scores improved only up to 20 % inclusion of maize cob in the mixture. All silage mixtures had excellent pH scores since pH values fell below 4 which is considered excellent for tropical silages (Bilal 2009, Nhan et al 2009). Average score of the silage mixtures indicate that the best physical characteristics were achieved when maize cob formed 20% of the mixture.    

 

Dry matter content of the silage increased as the proportion of maize cob in the mixture increased while crude protein content decreased (Table 2).

Table 2:  Silage score (0 – 5 scale*) based on physical characteristic and pH value

Parameter

MC0

MC10 

MC20 

MC30

SEM

p

Colour

3.90b

4.50a

4.90a

4.90a

0.10

0.031

Smell

4.20b

4.40b

5.00a

4.00b

0.13

0.028

Texture           

3.20c

4.20b

4.90a

5.00a

0.12

0.033

pH

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

0.16

0.030

Average score

4.08

4.53    

4.95

4.73

0.14

0.034

*0 – very bad; 1 – bad; 2 – going bad; 3 – moderate; 4 – good; 5 – excellent

 a,b,c: means without common superscript are different at p<0.05


Table 3: Chemical composition of wet brewers’ grain and maize cob silage

Parameter

MC0   

MC10

MC20

MC30

SEM

p

Dry matter

26.9d

31.4c

36.7b

43.5a

0.45

0.048

Crude protein

23.4a

19.1b

14.0c

12.0c

0.31

0.042

Ether extract

6.00a

5.60a

3.40b

3.01b

0.30

0.034

Ash     

4.35a

3.85a

3.08b

2.98b

0.17

0.031

Neutral detergent fibre

40.3d

49.7c

58.3b

62.7a

0.73

0.046

Acid detergent fibre

25.0b

29.0b   

36.3a

39.7a

1.01

0.041

Acid detergent lignin

7.67b   

7.97b

11.8a   

11.7a   

0.25

0.038

MC0: Wet Brewers’ gain alone, MC10: Wet brewers gain + 10% maize cobs, MC20: Wet brewers gain + 20% maize cobs, MC30: Wet brewers gain + 30% maize cobs
a,b,c,d: means without common superscript are different at p<0.05

When the CoP is equal to or greater than 1, the diet is considered to be acceptable and when CoP is less than 1, the diet is assumed to be unacceptable to livestock. In this study, CoP of MC10 was greater than 1 while MC0, MC20 and MC30 had CoP less than 1 (Table 4). The implication of this is that sheep would accept WBG ensiled with 10% of maize cob and reject WBG silage with no maize cob or more than 20% of maize cob. As earlier noted, the CoP may not be a realistic measure of acceptability of diets by ruminants (Olorunnisomo and Fayomi 2012) since it does not take into consideration, the previous experience of the animals or the relative importance of changing dietary preference of livestock.

Table 4: Preference of West African dwarf sheep fed wet brewers grain ensiled with different levels of maize cobs

Parameter

MC0

MC10

MC20

MC30

SEM

p

Intake (kg, DM)#

1.30b

1.93a

1.36b

1.22c

0.08

0.030

Coefficient of preference

0.89b

1.33a

0.94b

0.84b

0.04

0.024

% Preference

22.4b

33.2a

23.2c

21.0d

1.22

0.044

Preference ranking    

3rd      

1st

2nd

4th

-

-

a,b,c,d: means without common superscript are different at p<0.05
#
Free choice intake of silage by the animals was measured 2 hours after feed was  offered. MC0: Wet Brewers’ grain alone, MC10: Wet brewers gain + 10% maize cobs, MC20: Wet brewers gain + 20% maize cobs, MC30: Wet brewers gain + 30% maize cobs, SEM: Standard error of mean.

Acceptability of diets by livestock can also be measured as a percentage of total dietary intake. Percent preference appears to be a more realistic index of acceptability since it does not foreclose the possibility of changing dietary preference among livestock. Ikhimoya and Imasuen (2007) reported that small ruminants readily accept diets with which they have had previous experience while Provenza and Cincotta (1994) reported that pre-conditioning of small ruminants to a particular diet influence their choice among a variety of diets. In this study, the percent preference of sheep varied from 21.0 – 33.2 %. The order of preference was MC10 > MC20> MC0 > MC30. This shows that sheep preferred WBG silage with 10 – 20% maize cob to other silages. This may be related to the silage texture (mouth feel) which was enhanced by the addition of maize cob to the WBG silage. At 30% inclusion of maize cob, the silage may have become too coarse and less acceptable to the sheep due to the high content of structural carbohydrates.


Conclusions


References

Aguilera-Soto J I, Ramirez R G, Arechiga C F, Lopez M A, Banuelos R, Duran M and Rodriguez E 2007 Influence of wet brewers grains on rumen fermentation, digestion and performance in growing lambs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 6 (5): 641-645

AOAC 1995 Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.

Baghdassar G A, Yousif-Aballi A F and Salman E D 1986 The utilization of dried brewers’ grain in feeding Awassi sheep. 2: The utilization of dried brewers’ grain on the performance of fattening Awassi lambs. Journal of Agriculture and Water Resources Research, Animal Production 5 (2): 1-15.

Bilal M Q 2009 Effect of molasses and maize as silage additives on the characteristics of mott dwarf elephant grass silage at different fermentation periods. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 29 (1): 19 – 23.

Bovolenta S,  Piasentier E,  Peresson C and Malossini F 1998 The utilization of diets containing increasing levels of dried brewers' grains by growing lambs. Animal Science 66 (3): 689-695.

Cabral Filho S L S, Bueno I C,  da S and Abdalla A L 2007 Wet brewers' grain as replacement for hay in maintenance sheep diet. Ciência Animal Brasileira 8 (1): 65-73

Fox D G and Fenderson C L 1978 Influence of NPN treatment, oven temperature and drying time on error in determining true maize silage dry matter. Journal of Animal Science 47: 1152 – 1156.

Geron L J, Zeoula L M, Erkel J A, do Prado I N, Jonker R C and Guimaraes K C 2008 Digestibility coefficient and ruminal characteristics of cattle fed ration containing brewer grain. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37 (9): 1685-1695.

Ibhaze GA, Olorunnisomo O A, Aro SO and Fajemisin AN 2014 Dry matter intake, growth rate and feed conversion ratio of dry West African dwarf does fed ensiled maizecob based diets. Proc. 39th Conf., Nig. Soc. For Anim. Prod. 16 – 19 March, 2014. Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria. pp 239 – 242.

Ikhimioya I and Imasuen J A 2007 Blood profile of West African Dwarf Goats Fed Panicum maximum supplemented with Afzelia Africana and New bouldia laevis. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 6(1): 79 – 84.

Malau-Aduli B S, Eduvie L O, Lakpini C A M and  Malau-Aduli, A E O 2003 Variations in liveweight gains, milk yield and composition of Red Sokoto goats fed crop-residue-based supplements in the subhumid zone of Nigeria. Livestock Production Science 83(1): 63 – 71.

Muhammad I R, Mustapha M, Baba A, Ahmad M T and Abdurahman L S 2008 Use of legume in the improvement of silage quality of Columbus grass (Sorghum almum parodi). Research Journal of  Animal Sciences 2(4): 109 – 112.

Nhan N T H, Hon N V and Preston T R 2009 Ensiling with or without additives to preserve pineapple residue pollution of the environment. Livestock Research for Rural Development Volume 21, Article # 96. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/7/nhan21096.htm

Olorunnisomo O A 2010 Nutritive value of conserved maize, amaranth or maize- amaranth mixture as dry season fodder for growing West African Dwarf sheep. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #191. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/10/olor22191.htm 

Olorunnisomo O A  and Fayomi O H 2012 Quality and preference of zebu heifers for legume or elephant grass-silages with cassava peel. Livestock Research for Rural Development Volume 24  Article #168. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/9/olor24168.htm

Preston T R and Leng R A 2009 Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and sub-tropics. Penambul Books, Armidale (2009 New online edition)      http://www.utafoundation.org/P&L/preston&leng.pdf

Provenza F D and Cincotta R P 1994 Foraging as self- organizational learning process: Accepting adaptability at the expense of predictability. In: Hughes R. N. (editor) Diet selection. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK pp 79 – 101.

SAS 1995 Statistical Analysis System. SAS Institute Inc., Raleigh, New Cary, USA.

van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991 Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597.


Received 1 December 2014; Accepted 6 December 2014; Published 1 January 2015

Go to top