Livestock Research for Rural Development 23 (12) 2011 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Indigenous practices for the control and treatment of ailments in Zimbabwe’s village poultry

E S Masimba, D T Mbiriri, M T Kashangura and T Mutibvu

Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe,
P.O. Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
dmbiriri@agric.uz.ac.zw

Abstract

Most poor resourced communities depend on ethnoveterinary medicine for treating livestock diseases. A survey was carried out in Gutu district of Zimbabwe to establish the different ethnoveterinary practices used in poultry health management. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 200 households in four villages of Gutu district. Fifty households were randomly chosen per village.

 

About 64% of the respondents were male. More than fifty percent of the respondents had gone as far as secondary school. All households kept indigenous chickens with a mean number of 22.7 chickens per household. Other types of poultry kept included turkeys, guinea fowls and ducks. Diseases were acknowledged to be a constraint in poultry production. Ninety eight percent of the households relied on ethnoveterinary interventions only, in treating poultry diseases. Twelve medicinal plants were noted. Soot was also used as a remedy. Most of the remedies were used to treat more than one ailment.  Coccidiosis, respiratory problems and lice were among the health challenges recorded. Various modes of remedy application were employed by the households. This ethnoveterinary knowledge was mostly passed on orally from older to younger generations. It was recommended that a study be carried out, to diagnose poultry diseases found in the area.

Key words: Ethnoveterinary medicine, indigenous poultry, medicinal plants, poultry diseases, rural households


Introduction

According to the Word Health Organisation (WHO), at least 80% of people in developing countries depend largely on indigenous practices for the control and treatment of various diseases affecting both human beings and animals (Jabbar et al 2005). It was not until recently that more attention was drawn to these practices. Increased attention on ethnoveterinary medicine (EVM) is justified because; it is accessible, easy to prepare and administer at little or no cost at all (Jabbar et al 2005). These practices may be the only option in areas where conventional services are economically unavailable or cannot effectively reach (Mathias and McCorkle 2004), many EVM practices do work and make sound veterinary sense (Schillhorn van Veen 1996). Herbal medicines are known to be broad spectrum and therefore may be a future answer to pathogen resistance to conventional drugs (Mwale et al 2005).

 

Most rural households in Africa and other continents keep poultry native to their areas, especially chickens. The major constraints in the production of poultry under rural settings include diseases, poor nutrition and predation (Guèye 1997; Mungube et al 2008). Rural farmers are aware of the need to keep their flocks in good health. However, conventional drugs are either unavailable or too expensive for these resource-poor farmers, hence their dependence on EVM. The use of herbs and other medicinal plants is an integral part of ethnoveterinary practices. It is interesting to note that a number of medicinal plants found in different countries are used to cure the same ailments in livestock.

 

Knowledge on these indigenous flock health management practices is passed on through oral education from older to younger generations. If not captured and documented, practices that are peculiar to certain ethnic groups or areas may be lost. The main objective of this study was to document ethnoveterinay practices employed by rural households in Gutu district of Zimbabwe to treat ailments in their poultry flocks.


Materials and methods

A total of 200 questionnaires were administered in Gutu district of Zimbabwe. Fifty households were randomly selected in four villages namely; Mutamba, Maotsa, Jinjika and Chiwara. Data were collected through direct interviews using the vernacular language (Shona), with key informants. Information gathered included; demographic data, types of poultry kept, production systems employed, common health problems, treatment used, plant parts used (where medicinal plants were used as remedy) and modes of application. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 16 software.


Results

Household demographics

 

Sixty three percent of the households were headed by males. All the respondents were Christians. The highest academic qualification held by most respondents was ordinary level education. Only 8.55% had attained tertiary education.

 

Poultry populations

 

Four poultry species reared in Gutu district: chickens, turkeys, guinea fowl and ducks. As shown in Table 1, every household kept village chickens. The mean number of chickens per household was 22.7 (Table 1). The second most popular was turkey followed by guinea fowl and the least in terms of numbers were ducks. Ninety eight percent of the households raised their flocks under the extensive production system with the remaining 2% under semi-extensive system.

 

Poultry flock health

 

All the farmers said that they faced disease challenges in their flocks especially during the summer season. Most respondents could not name the diseases they experienced in their flocks but could describe clinical symptoms. All the respondents stated coccidiosis as a problematic disease. Over 50% of the respondents stated that respiratory problems and also external parasites (lice) were common in their poultry flocks (Figure 2).



Figure 1: Poultry populations in four villages of Gutu district


Table  1: Poultry numbers in four villages of Gutu district

Poultry type

Mean

Maximum

Minimum

Chicken

22.7

56

4

Turkeys

5.29

31

0

Ducks

0.06

4

0

Guinea fowl

2.00

16

0



Figure 2: Common ailments found in poultry species of Gutu district


Flock health management

 

None of the households relied on conventional medicines alone in treating poultry diseases. Ninety five percent of the households used traditional medicines only whilst the rest employed a combination of traditional and conventional remedies. The knowledge of the ethnoveterinary practices was mostly passed down generations orally. Sources of EVM knowledge included grannies and parents (61.5%), friends (20.5%), neighbors (12.5%) and others (6.5%).

Most of the non-conventional treatment of ailments involved the use of plant parts except for the use of soot. Every household made use of Aloe vera. Over 95% of the households acknowledged the use of Sarcostemma viminale in treating ailments in poultry. The rest of the medicinal plants made use of are listed in Figure 3.

  

Plant part used was similar across all the four villages, implying this knowledge is common and generally shared among households within a common setting. Table 2 shows the different plant parts of the 12 plant species used.


 


Figure  3:
Common remedial agents in poultry

 

The modes of application included giving fresh pieces of plant material, fermenting, drying, grinding, dissolving in drinking water and sprinkling birds. Most of the plants were dissolved in drinking water, including soot. Aloe vera could be given as freshly chopped pieces. As shown in Table 2, some plants, such as Aloe vera, Allium cepa, Allium sativam, Ficus exasperate and Erythrina abyssinica could be utilized through more than one mode of application.


Table 2: Plant species, parts and mode of application applied for the treatment of different poultry ailments

Species

Plant part used

Mode of application

Leaves

Bark

Fruit

Tuber/bulb

Albizia gummisera

 

 

X

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

Allium cepa

 

 

X

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

Crush, ferment in water and sprinkle the birds and the fowl run

 

Allium sativum

 

 

 

X

Crush and put  in drinking water

Crush, ferment in water and sprinkle the birds and the fowl run

 

Aloe vera

X

 

 

 

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

Chop and give as fresh pieces

 

Capsicum annuum

 

 

X

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

 

Cissus vitacea

X

 

 

 

Crush and squeeze juice onto the affected area

 

Erythrina abyssinica

 

 

X

 

 

Crush and put  in drinking water Dry, grind and put in drinking water

 

Euphorbia matabelensis

 

X

 

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

Ficus exasperate

 

X

 

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

Crush, ferment in water and sprinkle the birds and the fowl run

 

Lycopersicon esculentum

 

X

 

 

Crush and squeeze juice onto the affected area

 

Parinaria curatellifolia

 

X

 

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

 

Sarcostemma viminale

X

 

 

 

Crush and put  in drinking water

 


About 85% of the remedies employed were used to treat more than one disease (Table 3). Only Lycopersicon esculentum and Cissus vitacea had one specific use each, treating eye problems and wounds, respectively. Eleven out of 13 remedies were used to treat coccidiosis. Ten out of 13 remedies were used to treat diarrhoea problems.


Table 3: Proportion of tree, herb and shrub species used to treat different diseases

Plant species

Vernacular name

Disease treated

Proportion

Aloe vera

Gavakava

Coccidiosis

Respiratory problems

Wounds

100

69.0

52.5

Parinaria curatefollia

Muchakata

Coccidiosis

Diarrhoea

40.5

49.0

Erythrina abyssinica

Mutiti

Coccidiosis

Diarrhoea

65.5

49.0

Albizia gummisera

Mucherenje

Coccidiosis

Respiratory problems

Diarrhoea

71.5

56.0

48.0

Capsicum annum

Mhiripiri

Coccidiosis

Diarrhoea

79.5

47.0

Lycopersicon esculentum

Tomato

Eye problems

54.5

Cissus vitacea

Muvengahonye

Wounds

51.5

Ficus exasperate

Muonde

Coccidiosis

Diarrhoea

Lice

48.0

40.0

60.0

Allium sativum

Garlic

Coccidiosis

Diarrhoea

Lice

57.5

51.5

50.5

Soot

China’i

 

Coccidiosis

Respiratory problems

Diarrhoea

65.5

53.0

39.0

Sarcostemma viminale

Chifure

 

Coccidiosis

Diarrhoea

39.5

43.0

Allium cepa

Onion

Coccidiosis

Respiratory problems

Diarrhoea

Lice

20.0

59.0

48.0

59.5

Euphorbia matabelensis

Murimbo

Coccidiosis

Respiratory problems

Diarrhoea

39.5

52.5

49.5

Discussion

Household demographics

 

The trend observed with regards to sex of household reflects a typical African setup where most households are headed by males. Actually, Mlambo and co-workers (2011) observed a similar frequency where 65% of households were headed by males. Findings contrary to this trend were however revealed in a related study by Muchadeyi et al (2004) where more than 80% of households were headed by females. Although in other studies Christianity was the most popular form of religion (Mwale et al 2005), a 100% belonging to Christianity observed in this study was remarkable. The level of education in this study area was higher than those in Mushagashe where only 1% of respondents had secondary education (Mwale et al 2005).

 

Poultry populations

 

Most households in communal and smallholder farming areas across the world raise indigenous chickens. Studies in Sudan revealed an average flock size of 18.8 birds per farmer (Khalafalla et al 2000). Muchadeyi et al (2004) reported an average flock size of 17 in a rural district of Zimbabwe. Mammo et al 2008 established a rather low flock average of 5.6 in Ethiopia. The reported flock average of 22.7 in this study is within the ranges of other flock sizes of 20.7 and 21.8 reported by Mlambo et al (2011) and Mwale et al (2005) respectively. Turkeys and guinea fowls are also found in appreciable numbers in most rural communities. However, the average flock size observed in this study of 5.29 is higher than the 3.8 reported for Mushagashe (Mwale et al 2005). Ducks are usually found in very small numbers probably be due to a constraint in availability of water bodies.

 

Poultry flock health

 

In a number of studies, Newcastle Disease (ND) and coccidiosis have been noted to be the most prevalent disease constraints in village chicken production (Matekaire and Bwakura 2004; Woolcock et al 2004). There was no positive identification of diseases in this study. Respondents mostly stated symptoms and these were classified into respiratory problems, diarrhoea, wounds, eye infections and cocciodisis. It was difficult to diagnose diseases based on the symptoms presented by respondents, a challenge experienced by other researchers (Mengesha et al 2011; Maphosa et al 2004). The fact that no respondent mentioned Newcastle disease among other diseases like fowl coryza and fowl typhoid which have been reported in other similar studies (Mwale et al 2005) does not mean that these are absent in the study area. In a study conducted by Mlambo et al (2011), households showed a good knowledge of diseases and they had their flocks vaccinated against ND. This is in sharp contrast with findings in this study. Farmers exhibited poor knowledge of poultry diseases and also their flocks were not vaccinated against any disease.

 

Poultry flock health management

 

The high dependence on EVM is not unique to this area. EVM is applied in all forms of livestock, and even to humans especially in the smallholder farming sector of Zimbabwe (Mwale et al 2005). No side effects in the use of various EV practices were reported. This fact is one of the reasons why most rural communities have confidence in indigenous health management practices. The use of medicinal plants is an integral part of EVM (Sindhu et al 2010). The aloe species of plants, due to their pharmacological properties and wide distribution are the most commonly used plant species (Mwale et al 2005). The observed use of Aloe vera, soot, Euphorbia matabelensis, Parinaria curatefollia, Albizia gummisera and Capsicum annum in the treatment of coccidiosis is consistent with observations by Mwale et al (2005). The same researchers also reported the use of tomato and S. viminale in treating eye and gastrointestinal tract problems, respectively. E. abyssinica reported herein as used in the treatment of diarrheal problems has been noted by Lagu and Kayanja (2010) as applied as an antihelminth in South Western Uganda. In Nigeria, Fajimi and Taiwo (2004) reported A. cepa and F. exasperate to be used in the control of helminthes and external parasites. This is in close association with the uses of these plants as clearly shown by this study.


Conclusions and recommendations


References

Fajimi A K and Taiwo A A 2004 Herbal remedies in animal parasitic diseases in Nigeria: a review. African Journal of Biotechnology 4 (4) pp. 303-307.

 

Gueye E F 1997 Diseases in village chickens: control through ethnoveterinary medicine. ILEIA Newsletter 13: 20-21.

 

Jabbar A, Akhtar M S, Muhammed G and Lateef M 2005 Possible role of ethnoveterinary medicine in poverty reduction in Pakistan: use of botanical Anthelmintics as an example. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences 1 (2): 187-195.

 

Khalafalla A I, Sana A and Wegdan H 2000 Village chicken production in Sudan. 2nd research co-operation meeting of the co-ordinated research programme on improvement of health and management of family poultry production in Africa. 4th to 8th September 2000. Morogoro, Tanzania.

 

Lagu C and Kayanja F I B 2010 Medicinal plant extracts widely used in the control of Newcastle disease and helmintosis among village chickens of South Western Uganda. Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (200).

 

Mammo M, Berhan T and Tadelle D 2008 Village chicken characteristics and their seasonal production situation in Jamma District, South Wollo, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20 (7).

 

Maphosa T, Kusina J, Kusina N T, Makuza S and Sibanda S 2004 A monitoring study comparing production of village chickens between communal (Nharira) and small-scale commercial (Lancashire) farming areas in Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16 (48).

 

Matekaire T and Bwakura T M 2004 Ethnoveterinary Medicine: A potential alternative to orthodox Animal health delivery in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine 2 (4) 269-273.

 

Mathias E and McCorkle C M 2004 Traditional Livestock healers. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics) 23 (1) 277-284.

 

Mengesha M, Tamir B and Dessie T 2011 Village chicken constraints and traditional management practices in Jamma District South Wollo Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23 (37).

 

Mlambo T, Mbiriri D T, Mutibvu T and Kashangura M T 2011 Village chicken production systems in Zhombe communal area of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23 (154).

 

Muchadeyi F C, Sibanda S, Kusina N T, Kusina J and Makuza S 2004 The village chicken production system in Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16 (6).

 

Mungube E O, Bauni S M, Tenhagen B A, Wamae L W, Nzioka S M, Muhammed L and Nginji J M 2008 Prevalence of parasites of the local scavenging chickens in a selected semi-arid zone of Eastern Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production 40:101-109.

 

Mwale M, Bhebhe E, Chimonyo M and Halimani T E 2005 Use of herbal plants in poultry health management in the Mushagashe small-scale commercial farming area in Zimbabwe. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine 3 (2) 163-170.

 

Schillhorn van Veen T W 1996 Sense or non sense? Traditional methods of animal disease prevention and control in the African Savannah. In ethnoveterinary research and development (C. M. McCorkle, E. Mathias and T. W. Schillhorn van Veen, eds). Intermediate Technology Development Group Publications, London, 25 - 36.

 

Sindhu Z U D, Igbar Z, Khan M N, Jonsson N N and Siddique M 2010 Documentation of ethno-vetrinary practices used for treatment of different ailments in a selected hilly area of Pakistan, 201x. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology12: 353-358.

 

Woolcork R F, Harun M and Alders R G 2004 The impact of Newcastle disease control in village chickens on the welfare of rural households in Mozambique. Paper presented at the Fourth Co-ordination Meeting of the FAO/IAEA Co-ordination Research Programme on the ‘Assessment of the effectiveness of vaccination strategies against Newcastle Disease and Gumboro Disease using immunoassay-based technologies for increasing backyard poultry production in Africa.’ Vienna, Austria, 24-28 May 2004.


Received 19 Aug 2011; Accepted 23 October 2011; Published 2 December 2011

Go to top