Livestock Research for Rural Development 20 (9) 2008 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Evaluation of litter traits in a crossing project of V-line and Baladi Red rabbits in Egypt

Y M K Youssef, M Baselga*, M H Khalil**, S Gad-Alla and M L Garcia***

Animal Production Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt;
*Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera 14, Apdo 22012, 46071, Spain
**College of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine, Al-Qassim University, Buriedah 51452 P.O. Box 6622, Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia
***Departamento de Tecnología Agroalimentaria, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Ctra Beniel Km. 3.2 Orihuela 03312, Alicante Spain
maherhkhalil@yahoo.com

Abstract

Four-years crossing scheme involving Spanish V-line (V) and Egyptian Baladi Red (B) rabbits was practiced to produce five genetic groups of V, B, ½B½V, (½B½V)2, and ((½B½V)2)2. A new line with a genetic structure of ((½B½V)2)2 was synthesized and named APRI. A total of 2834 litters produced from 848 does pedigreed by 477 dams and 272 sires were used to evaluate litter size at birth (LSB) and weaning (LSW), litter weight at birth (LWB) and weaning (LWW), and pre-weaning litter gain (PLG). A generalized least square procedure (GLS) was used to estimate direct additive, direct heterosis, maternal heterosis, and direct recombination effect.

 

Heritabilities for litter traits were mostly low and ranging from 0.01 to 0.18, while the permanent environmental effects were mostly moderate and ranged from 0.09 to 0.33. Direct additive effects were mostly in favour of V-line does; indicating significant effects only for LSB and LWB by 23.0% and 24.2%, respectively, relative to the average of the means of V and B. All estimates for direct heterosis were significant and ranging from 20.0 to 27.7 %. The magnitudes of the estimates of maternal heterosis were mostly opposite to the magnitude of direct heterosis since the estimates were negatively unfavourable; ranging from -10.0 to 12.3 % comparing to the founder breeds.

Key words: additive effects, crossbreeding, heterosis, litter traits, rabbits, synthetic line


Introduction

In 2003, a co-operative crossbreeding rabbit project was established between Egypt and Spain to develop new line of meat rabbits suitable for hot climate. The V-line rabbits used in this project were crossed with an Egyptian Baladi Red (B). Traits related with productivity of the does, such as litter sizes and weights and milk production are considered the most important traits for an efficient production and some of these traits are objectives of selection to develop maternal lines of rabbits (Estany et al 1989: Gómez et al 1996; Rochambeau et al 1998; Baselga 2004). A deep knowledge involving crossbreeding parameters for these traits is lacking in hot climates (Khalil and Afifi 2000; Khalil et al 1995, 2004 and 2005; Al-Saef et al 2007). Thus, the objective of the present study was to estimate direct additive and heterotic effects, maternal heterosis, and recombination effects for litter traits in a crossbreeding program involving one Egyptian Baladi breed (B) and a Spanish V-line rabbits, that are the founders of the new line synthesized.

 

Material and methods  

Animals and crossbreeding program

 

Four-years crossbreeding project involving Egyptian Baladi Red rabbits (B) and a Spanish V-line (V) was started in 2003 in Gimmeza and Shakha Experimental Rabbitries, which belong to Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agriculture Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture. In this scheme, Baladi Red bucks were mated with V line does to get F1 of ½B½V, then does and bucks of this F1 were mated to get F2 of (½B½V)2, followed by two generations of inter se mating to get a new synthetic line named APRI with genetic structure of ((½B½V)2)2. Litters born in B, V, ½B½V, (½B½V)2, and ((½B½V)2)2 were 148, 1403, 171, 222, and 840, respectively. The bucks were randomly assigned to mate the does naturally with the restriction to avoid the matings of animals with common grandparents. A total of 2784 litters produced by 848 does pedigreed by 477 dams and 272 sires were used. Data collected were litter size at birth (LSB) and weaning (LSW), litter weight at birth (LWB) and weaning (LWW), and pre-weaning litter gain (PLG).

 

Housing and feeding

 

Rabbits of this work were raised in a semi-closed rabbitries. Breeding females and males were housed individually in wire cages with standard dimensions of 35 x 35 x 60 cm arranged in one-tire system allocated in rows along the rabbitry. The cage of each doe was equipped with a metal nest box for kindling and nursing the progeny up to weaning at four weeks of age. All cages of does and bucks were provided with feeders and nipple-drinkers.

 

Rabbits fed standard pelleted diet that offered ad libitum. The diet was composed from 32% barley, 21% wheat bran, 10% soybean meal, 22% hay, 6% berseem straw, 3% corticated cottonseed meal, 3% molasses, 1% limestone, 0.34% table salt, 0.3 minerals and vitamins, 0.06 methionine and 1.3% anti-coccidian. This diet provide 16.3% crude protein, 13.2% crude fiber, 2.5 either extract, 0.6 minerals mixture, 67.4% soluble carbohydrates and 2600 k cal / kg .

 

Model of analysis and estimation of crossbreeding genetic effects

 

For all litter traits, data were analyzed using a single-trait animal model as:

 

y= Xb + Zaua + Zpup + e

where:

y = vector of records of litter trait,

b = vector of fixed effects of genetic groups of the doe (five levels), year-season of kindling (17 levels), and parity (five levels);

ua = vector of random additive effects of the does and bucks in the pedigree,

up = vector of random effects of the permanent environment of the doe (permanent non-additive effect);

X, Za and Zp = incidence matrices relating records to the fixed effects, additive genetic effects, and permanent environment, respectively; and

e = vector of random error.

 

Variance components of random effects were estimated by a derivate-free restricted maximum likelihood procedure using MTDFREML software of Boldmann et al (1995). These estimates were used to solve the corresponding mixed model equations, obtaining solutions for the genetic group means and their error variance–covariance matrix, using the PEST program (Groeneveld 2006). To get the estimates of the crossbreeding genetic parameters of the lines (Dickerson 1992), a procedure of generalized least squares (GLS) was applied using the following linear model:

y = Xb + e,   Var(y) = V

where:

y = vector of estimated groups means, using the genetic group of Baladi Red as a reference population;

X = incidence matrix, 

b = vector of estimable crossbreeding genetic effects,

e = vector of random error, and

V = the error variance-covariance matrix of y.

The coefficients relating genetic crossbreeding parameters to the means of the genetic groups are showed in Table 1 (Dickerson 1992; Wolf et al 1995). Crossbreeding parameters of direct genetic effects D = DV - DB , direct (HI) and maternal (HM) heterosis and recombination effect (RI) were estimated using CBE program of Wolf (1996).


Table 1.  Genetic group of the does and their parents and coefficients of the matrix relating to the genetic group means of the does with the crossbreeding parameters

Ordinal

Doe
genetic group

Sire
genetic  group

Dam
genetic group

Mean

µ

Coefficients of the matrix*

DV

DB

HI

RI

HM

1

Baladi (B)

B

B

1

1

0

0

0

0

2

V-line (V)

V

V

1

0

1

0

0

0

3

½B½V

B

V

1

.5

.5

1

0

0

4

(½B½V)2

½B½V

½B½V

1

.5

.5

.5

.25

1

5

((½B½V)2)2

APRI

(½B½V)2

APRI

(½B½V)2

APRI

1

.5

.5

.5

.25

.5

* DV and DB = Direct additive genetic effects for V-line and Baladi Red breed, respectively; HI = Direct heterosis; RI = Direct recombination effect; HM = maternal heterosis. APRI = New synthetic line referring to Animal Production Research Institute.

Results and discussion

Overall actual means and variation

 

Means, standard deviations and minimum and maximum values for litter traits are presented in Table 2. For crossbreeding programs carried out in the Arabian countries involving V line rabbits, values reported by Khalil et al (2005) and Al-Saef et al (2007) in Saudi Arabia were slightly higher than those of the present study, while the values reported by Iraqi et al (2007) in Egypt were extremely lower. Consequently, these results could be encouraging factors to involve V-line in crossbreeding programs in Egypt and other hot climatic countries.


Table 2.   Summary statistics for litter traits studied

Litter trait

No.

Mean

SD

Minimum

Maximum

LSB, young

2834

8.77

1.94

1

16

LSW, young

2740

6.09

1.48

1

12

LWB, g

2833

430

85

60

700

LWW, g

2740

3031

601

465

5720

PLG, g

2740

2599

572

145

5325

+LSB= Litter size at birth; LSW= Litter size at weaning; LWB= Litter weight at birth;
LWW= Litter weight at weaning; PLG= pre-weaning litter gain


Genetic additive effects (h2) and non-additive and permanent environmental effects (p2)

 

Heritabilities for litter traits were mostly low and ranging from 0.01 to 0.18 (Table 3). Estimates of heritability got in the present study for litter traits are within the ranges cited in the literature estimated by an animal model (Ferraz et al 1992; Lukefahr et al 1996; Lukefahr and Hamilton 1997; Rastogi et al 2000; Sorensen et al 2001; El-Deghadi 2005; Khalil et al 2005).

 

The ratios of permanent environmental effects (p2) were mostly moderate and ranged from 0.09 to 0.33 (Table 3). Similar estimates were reported by Lukefahr and Hamilton (1997), El-Raffa (2000), Sorensen et al (2001), El-Deghadi (2005) and Khalil et al (2005) using an animal model.


Table 3.   Estimates of the proportion of the phenotypic variance due to genetic additive effects (h2) and to non-additive and permanent environmental effects (p2) with their standard errors (±SE) for litter traits studied

Litter trait1

h2±SE

p2±SE

e2±SE

LSB

0.01±0.021

0.33±0.033

0.66±0.02

LSW

0.01±0.022

0.19±0.030

0.80±0.021

LWB

0.13±0.030

0. 11±0.024

0.76±0.02

LWW

0.18±0.005

0.18±0.020

0.64±0.019

PLG

0.05±0.024

0.09±0.023

0.86±0.02

1See Table 2.


Crossbreeding effects

 

The main objective of this study was to estimate the crossbreeding parameters in terms of direct additive, direct heterosis, maternal heterosis and recombination losses. Estimation of these crossbreeding parameters were carried out using the methodology explained in Material and Methods section and some estimates for the effects of recombination losses were non-expected. Particularly, the structure of our data was not well conditioned to estimate the recombination losses since the standard errors of these estimates were somewhat high. For this reason, we have decided to simplify the model of crossbreeding parameters by eliminating the effects of recombination losses. Accordingly, the column corresponding to this effect in Table 1 was eliminated. Consequently, results and discussion represented here refer to the estimates obtained for crossbreeding parameters with such simplified model.

 

In general, direct additive effects for litter traits studied were in favour of V line does (Table 4). Differences between line V and Baladi Red in direct additive effects were significant for two litter traits out of five (LSB and LWB, Table 4). These results evidenced that genes of line V had better direct additive effects on litter size and weight at birth.


Table 4.  Estimates of differences between line V and Baladi Red breed in direct effects and their standard errors (±SE) for litter traits studied

Litter trait1

Direct additive effects (DV - DB)

Estimate ± SE

%2

LSB, young

1.78±0.48*

23.0

LSW, young

0.45±0.41 NS

8.1

LWB, g

95±21*

24.2

LWW, g

129±171 NS

4.5

PLG, g

33.5±168 NS

1.4

1 See Table 2, 2 Percentage of the difference referred to the average of the values for V line and Baladi Red breed, NS = Non-significant; * P<0.05


Differences in direct additive effects for litter size and weight at birth were of considerable importance of 23.0% and 24.2% relative to the average of the founder genetic groups (Table 4). Crossing line V with Sinai Gabali in Egypt to get F1 showed that line V was significantly superior to the Sinai Gabali for litter size and weight at birth (Iraqi et al 2007). In addition, Lukefahr et al (1983), García et al (2000), Khalil et al (2005) and El-Deghadi (2005) reported significant direct additive effects on litter traits. Khalil and Afifi (2000) and El-Deghadi (2005) in crossing experiment between NZW and Gabali rabbits reported that NZW rabbits had higher estimates of direct additive effects than Gabali rabbits for litter size and/or litter weight at birth and weaning (P<0.01 or P<0.001).

 

All estimates of direct heterosis verified that crossbred does were usually associated with significant and favourable heterotic effects on litter traits studied; the estimates ranged from 20.0 to 27.7 % (Table 5). All significant estimates were favourable from a production point of view. Crossbreeding experiments carried out in Egypt (e.g. Khalil et al 1995; Khalil and Afifi 2000; Abd El-Aziz et al 2002; El-Deghadi 2005) reported significant direct heterotic effects on litter size and weight traits. In addition, Baselga et al (2003) in an experiment of crossbreeding, involving three maternal lines, had significant direct heterosis for litter size at birth in two of the three possible simple crosses obtained. On the contrary, Iraqi et al (2007) in Egypt found that estimates of direct heterosis for litter size and weight at birth and weaning were not significant.

 

Most estimates of maternal heterosis were significantly unfavourable since the estimates were negative and ranging from 10.0 to 12.3 % relative to the average of the means of V and B (Table 5). The magnitudes of maternal heterosis are completely opposite to the magnitude of direct heterosis for these traits. Khalil et al (2004) and Al-Saef et al (2007) have reported significant maternal heterosis for pre-weaning litter traits.


Table 5.  Estimates of direct and maternal heterosis and their standard errors (±SE) for litter traits studied

Doe trait1

Direct heterosis

Maternal heterosis

Estimate ± SE

%2

Estimate ± SE

%2

LSB, young

1.85±0.48*

23.9

-0.37±0.45 NS

-4.8

LSW, young

1.54±0.41*

27.7

0.10±0.33 NS

1.8

LWB, g

108±21.2*

27.6

-39±17.4*

-10.0

LWW, g

800±171*

27.6

-346±140*

-12.0

PLG, g

495±165*

20.0

-306±135*

-12.3

1 See Table 2, 2 Percentage of the heterosis effects referred to the average of the values for V line and Baladi breed, NS = Non-significant; * P<0.05

Conclusions


Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Spanish Agency of International Cooperation for supporting the project.

 

References 

Abd El-Aziz, M M, Afifi E A, Bedier Nayera Z, Azamel, A A and Khalil M H  2002 Genetic evaluation of milk production and litter weight traits in Gabali, New Zealand White rabbits and their crosses in a newly reclaimed area of Egypt. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Scientific Conference on Rabbit Production in Hot Climates, Hurghada, 8-11 October 2002, 103-116, Egypt

 

Al-Saef A M, Khalil M H, Al-Homidan A H, Al-Dobaib S N, Al-Sobayil K A, García, M L and Baselga M 2007 Crossbreeding Effects for Litter and Lactation Traits in new Saudi lines of Rabbits in hot climates. Livestck Science, 26(7): In Press, Official Journal of the European Association for Animal Production

 

Baselga M 2004 Genetic improvement of meat rabbits. Programs and diffusion. In the Congress. 8th World Rabbit Congress, Puebla, Mexico, September 2004

 

Baselga M, García M L, Sánchez J P, Vicente J S and Lavara R 2003 Analysis of reproductive traits in crosses among maternal lines of rabbits. Animal Research 52: 473- 479 http://animres.edpsciences.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/animres/pdf/2003/05/Z3506.pdf

 

Boldmann K G, Kriese L A, Van Tassell C P, Kachman S D 1995 A manual for use of MTDFREML. A set programs to obtain estimates of variances and covariance [DRAFT]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, USA.

 

Dickerson G E 1992 Manual for evaluation of breeds and crosses of domestic animals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, PP 47

 

El-Deghady Amira S 2005 Genetic evaluation for some productive traits in rabbits. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Banha University, Egypt

 

El-Raffa A M 2000 Animal model evaluation of V Line Rabbits raised under Egyptian conditions. Egypt. Poultry Science 20:1003-1016

 

Estany J, Baselga M, Blasco A and Camacho J 1989 Mixed model methodology for estimation of genetic response to selection in litter size in rabbits. Livestock Production Science 21: 67-75

 

Ferraz J B S, Johnson R K and Van Vleck L D 1992 Estimation of genetic trends and genetic parameters for reproductive and growth traits of rabbits raised in subtropics with animal model. Journal of Applied Rabbit Research 15:131-142

 

García M L, Baselga M, Lavara R, Lavara F and Vicente J S 2000 Reproductive characters in crossbreeding among three maternal lines of rabbits. 7th World Rabbit Congress, Valencia, Spain, Volume A: 397-402

 

Gómez E A, Rafel O, Ramon J and Baselga M 1996 A genetic study of a line selected on litter size at weaning. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Rabbit Congress, Toulouse, France, 9-12 July 1996, 2: 289-292

 

Groenoveld E 2006 “PEST User´s Manual”, Institute of Animal Science, Holtystrabe 10, D-31535 Neustadt, Germany

 

Iraqi m m, Shenana M E and Baselga M 2007 Some factors affecting productive and milk composition characters in a crossbreeding experiment involving Gabali and V- line rabbits in Egypt. World Rabbit Science (in press)

 

Khalil M H and Afifi E A 2000 Heterosis, maternal and direct additive effects for litter performance and post-weaning growth in Gabali rabbits and their F1 crosses with New Zealand White. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Rabbit Congress, Valencia, Spain, 4-7 July 2000, Volume A: 431-437

 

Khalil M H, Mehaia M A, Al-Homidan A H and Al-Sobayil K A 2004 Genetic analysis for milk yield and components and milk conversion ratio in crossing of Saudi rabbits with V-line. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Rabbit Congress, 7-10 September 2004, Puebla, Mexico, pp 82-89

 

Khalil M H, Afifi E A, Youssef Y M K and Khadr A F 1995 Heterosis, maternal and direct genetic effects for litter performance and reproductive intervals in rabbit crosses. World Rabbit Science 3(3):99-105

 

Khalil M H, García M L Al-Dobaib S N, AL-Homidan A H and Baselga M 2005 Genetic evaluation of crossbreeding project involving Saudi and Spanish V-line rabbits to synthesize new maternal lines in Saudi Arabia: I. Pre-weaning litter, lactation traits and feeding parameters. 4th International Conference of Rabbit Production in Hot Climate, 24-27 February 2005, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, pp 89-99

 

Lukefahr S D and Hamilton H H 1997 Heritability and repeatability of maternal performance traits in purebred and crossbred does. World Rabbit Science 5(3): 99-105

 

Lukefahr S D, Hohenboken W D, Cheeke P R and Patton N M 1983 Doe reproduction and pre-weaning litter performance of straightbred and crossbred rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 57(5):1090-1099 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/57/5/1090

 

Lukefahr S.D, Cheeke P R and Patton N M 1996 Heritability of milk production and 21-day litter weight and litter size in purebred and crossbred rabbits using an animal model. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Rabbit Congress, Toulouse, France, 9-12 July 1996, Volume 2:319-3230

 

Rastogi R K, Lukefahr S D and Lauckner F B 2000 Maternal heritability and repeatability for litter traits in rabbits. Livestock Production Science 67: 123-128

 

Rochambeau H de, Duzert R and Tudela F 1998 Long term selection experiments in rabbit. Estimation of genetic progress on litter size at weaning. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to livestock Production, Armidale, NSW, Australia, 11-16 January 1998, Volume 26: 112-115

 

Sorensen P, Kjaer J B, Brenoe U T and Sug 2001 Estimates of genetic parameters in Danish White rabbits using an animal model. II. Litter traits. World Rabbit Science 9(1): 33-38

 

Wolf J 1996 User's Manual for the Software Package CBE, Version 4.0 (A universal program for estimating crossbreeding effects). Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague-Uhrineves, Czech Republic.

 

Wolf J, Distl O, Grosshan T and Seeland G 1995 Crossbreeding in farm animals.  Analysis of crossbreeding plans with secondary crossbred generations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 112: 81-94



Received 27 December 2007; Accepted 17 April 2008; Published 4 September 2008

Go to top