Livestock Research for Rural Development 13 (3) 2001 | Citation of this paper |
Reproductive performances of the
Creole goat, the meat breed of Guadeloupe in the Caribbean, are
described from a database generated for 15 years (1973 to 1988)
at an experimental farm of the Institut National de la Recherche
Agronomique (INRA, Guadeloupe, French West Indies). The data
contain information on 599 females, 2259 attempted matings, 2135
achieved matings and 1904 kiddings. Animals were reared under
semi-intensive management conditions (on the basis of feeding
system, health and culling policy). Main sources of variation
were analysed: mating type (buck in permanence or buck effect),
mating season (dry, intermediate and humid season) and rank of
kidding. The Creole goat is a continuous breeder. On average 94.5
percent of exposed females were mated (defined as mating rate)
and 90.5 percent of exposed females achieved a kidding (fertility
rate). Their prolificacy reached 1.98 kids/kidding, with only 3.9
percent of kids born dead. These reproductive parameters varied
essentially with rank of kidding but very poorly with the mating
season. Productivity of these females was regularly high during
their whole lifetime production. From the results obtained, it is
concluded that Creole goats have very high reproductive
performances, provided that animal husbandry and nutrition are
adequate.
In the Caribbean, as in many other
tropical countries, goats are mainly raised under the suckling
system for meat production (Devendra and Burns 1983; Alexandre et
al 1991). In spite of the fact that the goat is of paramount
importance to smallholders and to the local meat markets, only a
few isolated attempts at improving its production through
controlled management have been made. In addition, little
attention has been paid to the indigenous tropical breeds (Taneja
1982; Devendra and Burns 1983; Le Gal and Planchenault 1993),
that have been considered adapted to the tropics but of low
productivity.
It is generally reported that
increasing the reproductive rate and/or reproductive performances
are important ways of improving meat production in the tropics (Terril
1983; Wilson and Light 1986). Therefore, an assessment of
the general reproductive characteristics of native breeds is
necessary prior to developing strategies aimed at improving meat
supplies. The assessment of the production
potential requires a large number of animals, raised over several
years and under controlled management. Only a few studies
on the tropical goats reproductive performances have been
reported under experimental station conditions (Kochapakdee et al
1994; Montaldo et al 1995).
In Guadeloupe, the local meat breed is called the Creole goat as it is called in other Caribbean regions. Recent studies in the field of genetic markers indicated that it was derived from the West African Dwarf Goat (Pepin 1994). Experiments have been carried out in Guadeloupe on the Creole goat evaluating reproductive physiology (Chemineau 1986) and preweaning performances (Alexandre et al 1999). The objectives of this present study were to determine the reproductive potential of the Creole goat and to examine the main factors responsible for variations observed.
This study was based on data
generated from 1973 to 1988 (15 years) in the Animal Production
Unit (APU) at the INRA Research Centre in Guadeloupe. Guadeloupe
is a humid tropical island of the Caribbean area (16.1° N; 61.6°
W). The experimental farm of the INRA-APU is located in the dry
zone. Annual rainfall averages 1280 mm, with a marked dry season
from January to July (less than 70 mm per month). Maximum air
temperature varies from 27°C (January) to 32°C (August) and the
minimum from 21°C to 25°C, respectively. The relative
humidity is usually above 70% and the day length ranges from 11 h
to 13 h.
All the females used in the
experimental flock were Creole goats, which have been described
as small-sized animals by Chemineau et al (1984). The adult
females had a mean (± SD) liveweight of 25 ± 7 kg and a mean (±
SD) wither height of 51 ± 4 cm. Initially, animals were
maintained under extensive management conditions from 1973 to
1979. This involved grazing dry pastures, no supplementation and
limited preventive health management. Males were permanently kept
with the herd. The stock was built up from 1979 with animals
coming from different zones of Guadeloupe. The flock size
increased from about 50 to 100 does. Since 1979 semi-intensive
reproductive management has been practised, achieving a frequency
of three kiddings in two years and three mating seasons per year
(March, July and November). From 1979 to 1983 several experiments
took place in the field of reproductive performance and sexual
activity of the does and bucks (Chemineau 1986). Since 1984 the
research program has dealt with feeding of the does during the
suckling period; and the goat flock has expanded from 120 to 150
does.
From 1979 to 1988, the buck effect
was systematically used for inducing ovulatory and oestrus
activities. At each season, after more than three weeks of
complete separation from females, vasectomised males, harnessed
with raddle blocks, were introduced in the doe flock at a ratio
of one male to ten females. The mating period lasted for 45 days
from 1979 to 1983 and lasted for 30 days from 1984 to 1988. Every
day, freshly marked females were exposed to a specific male
chosen according to a planned mating. Hand mating was then
conducted once per day, from 1979 to 1983 and then twice per day,
from 1984 to 1988.
Dipping was done every 2 weeks for
tick control, while anthelminthic drenchings were carried out
every month for the suckling kids and every 1.5 to 2 months for
the weaned animals and adults, from 1979 to 1988
Year round grazing was on Digitaria
decumbens pastures, which were rotated at 35 days age of
regrowth. These pastures were irrigated after 1984 and were
fertilised with 300 kg N/ha/y. As regards supplementation, no
supplementary feed was provided from 1973 to 1979. After 1979,
reproductive and suckling does were supplemented with commercial
pellets (10.3 MJ ME and 180 g CP per kg DM) which were supplied
at various levels depending on the experiment.
Regular animal performance monitoring was carried out and this allowed the development of a database containing information on 599 females, involving 2259 attempted matings, 2135 achieved matings and 1904 kiddings. Unknown reproduction management occurring during the first four years and management with buck running permanently with the flock represented 26% of the total of attempted matings. At each mating season, the number of females exposed to teaser males was noted. At every reproductive event, i.e. oestrus, mating, or service, dates and the number of the animal involved were recorded. If abortion occurred, this was recorded along with the size of the aborted litter. At birth, animals were ear tagged, then the number of the parents, the sex and number of stillborn and living kids were collected. From 1973 to 1979 and for the 20 % of the foundation flock, the females had unknown birth date, then age at first kidding was not estimated. So intervals between different reproductive events have been calculated as the interval related to the first kidding; this term has been defined as the reproductive age of the doe. Rank of kidding has been defined as the parity of the doe. Mating rate (MR) has been calculated, for each mating season, as the ratio of the number of matings to the number of exposed females. Fertility rate (FR) is the frequency of exposed females giving birth to kids (born dead or alive). Between two successive kiddings, the number of matings which were necessary to induce a kidding were added and named number of services per kidding. The litter size (LS) was defined as number of total born kids reported on total kidding does. General linear model (SAS 1988) procedures were used to adjust data to the following sources of variation: year, experiments nested to the year, mating season, mating type combined with year and rank of kidding.
During three successive years the
two mating types, buck effect and buck running permanently with
the flock, were used for different experiments in two different
groups. The main results are reported in Table 1. The mean (± SD)
fertility rate varied from 86 ± 4 % to 90 ± 3 %, while the mean
(± SD) kidding intervals ranged from 284± 28 days to 246 ± 10
days and the mean (± SD) litter sizes were 1.95 ± 0.13 and 1.80
± 0.05 total kids born alive, respectively. The kid mortality at
birth was 0.02 to 0.04 %.
Table
1: Reproductive performances of the Creole goat
at the INRA Guadeloupe according to the year and the
mating type: M1, buck effect and M2, buck kept
permanently with the flock (definitions in the text) |
||||||
Mating year |
1979 |
1980 |
1981 |
|||
Mating
type |
M1 |
M2 |
M1 |
M2 |
M1 |
M2 |
Number
of does |
93 |
27 |
151 |
71 |
157 |
30 |
Mating
rate * (%) |
94a |
84b |
84A |
100B |
92A |
100B |
Fertility
rate ** (%) |
82a |
88a |
85 A |
95 B |
90a |
88b |
Kidding
interval (days) |
319A |
223B |
262a |
252a |
270a |
254b |
Kids
born alive |
2.02A |
1.75B |
2.00a |
1.82b |
1.76a |
1.82a |
Kids
born dead |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
*
Mating rate = ratio of the number of matings to the
number of exposed females ** Fertility rate = frequency of exposed females giving birth to kids (dead or alive) Values within same row and same year with different superscripts are significantly different: a and b for P<0.05 and for A and B for P<0.01 |
Number of exposed females, matings
and kiddings were generally at the same level for the three
mating seasons (Table 2). Average mating and fertility rates were
95.0 and 90.5 %, respectively. Kidding interval was 267 days and
number of total kids born per kidding varied from 1.92 to 2.00.
During mating in the intermediate season of July, lower services
per kidding (1.06) and higher fertility rates (92.7 %) where
observed than in the two other seasons. No other mating season
effect upon reproductive parameters was observed.
Table
2: Reproductive performances of the Creole goat
at the INRA Guadeloupe according to the mating season (adjusted
data for mating type and year): mating and fertility
rates (%), number of services per kidding, kiddings
interval (days) and prolificacy at birth (number of
kids born alive or dead) |
||||
Parameter\Mating
season* |
Dry |
Intermediate |
Rainy |
SE |
Number
of joinings |
790 |
753 |
716 |
|
Number
of matings |
740 |
711 |
684 |
|
Number
of kiddings |
646 |
658 |
600 |
|
Mating
rate ** (%) |
93.5 |
94.5 |
95.5 |
0.05 |
Fertility
rate ** (%) |
89.1a |
92.7 b |
89.6 a |
0.08 |
Number
of services *** |
1.09 a |
1.06 b |
1.08 a |
0.08 |
Kidding
interval (days) |
270 |
265 |
266 |
45 |
Number of kids born alive | 1.82 |
1.89 |
1.86 |
0.09 |
Number of kids born dead | 0.08 |
0.08 |
0.06 |
|
*
Dry season (mid March), intermediate season (mid July)
and rainy season (mid November) ** Mating rate = ratio of the number of matings to the number of exposed females; fertility rate = frequency of exposed females giving birth to kids (dead and/or alive) *** Number of services per kidding = total number of matings, between two successive kiddings, necessary to induce a kidding Values within same row with different superscripts are different P<0.01 |
The buck effect was applied
between 1979 and 1988 with a 2-year break in 1982 and 1983 where
other experimental techniques were conducted. The year effect was
studied for this mating type. Significant differences (P<0.01)
occurred from one year to another for mating and fertility rates
(Figure 1a).
Figure 1a: Yearly variations of
reproductive performances of Creole goats in Guadeloupe:
mating rate (ratio of the number of matings to the number
of exposed females, %) and fertility rate (frequency of
exposed females giving birth to kids, dead and/or alive,
%) |
Mating rates ranged from 84 % to
98 %, while fertility rates varied from 82 % to 96 %. Except for
the years 1979 to 1981, when specific experiments on reproduction
occurred, kiddings interval decreased from 280 to 245 days and
litter size was regularly distributed around 1.9 kids born alive
(Figure 1b).
Figure 1b: Yearly variations of reproductive performances of Creole goats in Guadeloupe: kidding interval (days) and litter size at birth (number of kids born alive / kidding) |
The flock comprised more than 50 %
of the total females having achieved 3 kiddings and having an 18
month-reproductive age (Table 3). Almost one third of the flock (29
% females) had their rank of kidding equal to or higher than 6
kiddings with a reproductive age reaching 43 or 52 months,
respectively.
Table
3: Creole goats distribution according to rank
of kidding and age of reproduction of the does |
|||||||
Rank
of kidding |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
³ 7 * |
Number
of kiddings |
599 |
437 |
311 |
225 |
155 |
92 |
85 |
Frequency
(%) |
100 |
73 |
52 |
38 |
26 |
15 |
14 |
Reproductive
age ** |
0 |
9 |
18 |
26 |
35 |
43 |
52 |
*
Rank of kidding equal or higher than 7 ** Reproductive age is calculated in months as the interval between one given kidding to the next kidding (definitions in the text) |
The mating and the kidding rates (Figure
2) ranged from 91 % and 76 % to 93 % and 82 %, from the first to
the fifth rank of kidding. These figures then declined regularly
to 85 % and 68 % for the last rank of kidding, respectively.
The litter size at birth increased from 1.65 to 2.35 total kids
born, from the first to the seventh kiddings, respectively (Figure
2). The values for the number of kids born alive were 1.52 and 2.20,
respectively. The difference between the total number of kids
born and the number of kids born alive (0.05) remained stable
during most of the reproductive life of the doe, except for the
first kidding (0.13) and for the last rank of kidding (0.15).
Figure 2: Kidding rate (%) and litter size (number of kids born alive or total kids born / kidding) of Creole goats in Guadeloupe according to the rank of kidding |
Variations in the mating and fertility rates according to the kidding interval are represented in Figure 3. The best results were observed for intervals ranging from 225 to 280 days. The mating and fertility rates reached an optimum of 97 % and 92 %, respectively. For longer post-partum intervals, the fertility rate decreased (P<0.01), with more than 10 points of difference for intervals equal or higher than 500 days.
Figure 3: Mating and kidding rate (%) of Creole goats according to the kidding interval |
The relationships between
performances of two successive kiddings of the same doe are
indicated in Table 4. The litter size (number of kids born alive)
of a doe during its kidding number "n + 1",
increased with its litter size during its kidding number "n".
No significant differences were observed for the number of still
born kids or for the fertility rate.
Table
4: Reproductive performance of Creole goats in
Guadeloupe during their kidding number "n+1"
according to their litter size during their kidding
number "n": mating and fertility rates (%) and
prolificacy at birth (number of alive and dead born kids) |
|||||
Litter
size at kidding number n (alive born kids) |
0 |
1 |
2 |
³ 3 * |
|
Number
of kiddings |
43 |
375 |
845 |
208 |
|
Mating
rate ** (%) |
89 |
96 |
93 |
98 |
P<0.01 |
Fertility
rate ** (%) |
82 |
90 |
90 |
91 |
NS |
Litter
size at kidding number n +1 (kids born alive) |
1.82 |
1.86 |
2.03 |
2.20 |
P<0.01 |
Litter
size at kidding number n +1 (kids born dead) |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
009 |
NS |
*
Litter size equal or higher than 3 kids/kidding ** Mating rate = ratio of the number of matings to the number of exposed females; fertility rate = frequency of exposed females giving birth to kids (dead and/or alive) |
We observed classical effects of
year and rank of kidding on almost all the variables studied; on
the other hand there was a significant year*season interaction.
From one year to another, different management conditions
occurred and that is the reason why analyses have been carried
out on separate parts of the database. Bad management conditions
occurring from 1973 to 1979 (as described in the materials and
methods section: grazing dry pastures, no supplementation and
limited preventive health management) induced low and irregular
performances such as 80 % and 198 % for fertility and prolificacy
rate, respectively. In the second phase from 1979 to 1983, all
reproductive parameters were improved (87 and 203 %, respectively),
owing to adequate concentrate supply levels. In fact, good
nutritional levels of the does appeared to be responsible for the
high reproductive performances observed, which agrees with what
was stated by Lindsay et al (1993) and by Walkden-Brown and
Restall (1996). In the third phase from 1984 to 1988, irrigated
grazing conditions and good reproductive management promoted
equally good results (93 and 191 %, respectively) with short
kidding intervals and very few seasonal variations.
In many parts of the Tropics,
natural mating in goats generally occurs with bucks that run
freely with the does all year round or during the once-a-year
breeding season. The sudden introduction of bucks induces
fertile cyclic reproductive activity in seasonally anovulatory
does (Chemineau 1987). This technique, termed the male effect,
has considerable potential for the induction of early breeding,
the synchronisation of breeding activity, and possible
enhancement of the ovulation rate. The buck effect was very
efficient for the Creole goat under our tropical conditions for
the following reasons: (i) Creole goats are known to have low
seasonality of sexual activity (Chemineau 1983), similar to
breeds which originated from tropical and subtropical latitudes (Delgadillo
et al 1997); in fact, at tropical latitudes responsiveness
to photoperiod is lost or masked and most indigenous breeds of
goats are able to exhibit oestrus cycles year-round; and (ii) in
these environments nutritional and social factors are the major
regulators of reproductive function. In our experimental
conditions, does are mated after a flushing period is carried out
thus ensuring they have good body condition, as recommended by
Lindsay et al (1993). Moreover, the mating period lasts for
a sufficient time (30 to 45 days of contact) with a good
proportion of teaser males (10 to 15 %) being present.
Information on
reproductive performances of does based on the systematic use of
the buck effect is limited. Nevertheless, the performance of the
Creole goats seems to be exceptional. Kidding intervals were
short and regular allowing for intensive reproduction management
which resulted in high kidding frequencies (3 kiddings within 2
years) followed without failures along the whole reproductive
career of the does. The fertility rate was higher than 90 %,
comparable with reports for the best tropical breeds such as the
West African Dwarf in Africa (Osuagwuh 1992), the
Kambing Katjang in Asia (Devendra and Burns 1983), the Thai goat
reared under intensive feeding (Kochapakdee et al 1994), the
Criollo of Venezuela (Gonzalez-Stagnaro 1983) and the Nubian in
Northern Mexico (Mellado et al 1991). The frequency of multiple
births was remarkably high (greater than 80 % for all sources of
variations). Devendra and Burns (1983) in their exhaustive
review on goat reproduction evaluated the Creole goat as a
highly prolific breed. Chemineau (1983, 1986) has studied its
reproductive abilities on the physiological point of view. Our
work, based upon long-term animal monitoring, confirms the high
reproductive potential of this local and hardy breed. The
prolificacy rate (up to 1.98 kids/kidding) is higher than that of
other native or tropical breeds reared in Latin America (Gonzalez-Stagnaro
1983) or for Nubian goats in Mexico (Mellado et al 1991) and for
local Mexican goats even those up-graded by exotic breeds (Montaldo
et al 1995). Our value is in fact similar to the litter size of 1.93
to 2.25 for the famous Boer goat reported by Casey et al in 1988.
The mortality rate observed at birth was very low as compared to the frequently high level recorded for goats in adverse environments (Morand-Fehr et al 1984; Sherman 1987). Only 3 % of the kiddings observed had zero live kids while for 95 % there were no stillborn kids. In tropical conditions mortality varies according to the viability of the new-born kids (birthweight and adaptability to post-natal period, as stated by Morand-Fehr et al 1984 and by Hussain et al 1995), to nutritional level of the does or to their milk yield (Alexandre 1991; Osuagwuh 1992; Hussain et al 1995) and to disease constraints that are numerous. So this trait can be considered as very useful for this hardy breed, and indicates their very good reproductive abilities. On average Creole goats gave birth to a total of 14.2 live kids from their first mating to their last kidding, 53 months later, i.e. 3.22 live kids per year of reproductive life. It seems that does can be culled after 6 kiddings thus giving the opportunity to apply a 20 % culling rate.
Creole meat goats exhibit very
good reproductive abilities - continuous breeding with high
conception rates - provided nutrition and health preventive
management are adequate, which is not very frequent in tropical
conditions. The analyses of these data from a Guadeloupean
research station, nonetheless, show the significant effect that
management exerts on reproductive potential of a hardy native
breed such as the Creole goat. Kidding interval has been
successfully reduced while fertility and mating rates have been
increased by imposing a regular and efficient "buck effect",
and culling policies based on poor reproductive performances.
Litter size at birth was remarkably high while neonatal mortality
was low. Thus there exists considerable scope for improving goat
meat production in the tropics, as we know that the most
important requirement of a meat-producing animal is a
consistently high rate of reproduction. On the other hand, this
reproductive potential also makes a strong evidence for goats in
the tropics as a milk producer as was argued in the extensive
review of Knights and Garcia (1997).
The main non-genetic effects have
been estimated and this allows a well-documented characterisation
of this native breed. More statistical analysis is now being
conducted to determine the genetic parameters of the productive
traits in order to define a breed improvement program. Further
studies are required in order to assess levels of reproductive
performances and factors of variation under farm conditions.
The authors express thanks to H
Borel, V Gartizer, H Mogne-Mali, G Paul-Urbain and to D Renard
for their collaboration and technical assistance. They are also
very grateful to Dr Gary Garcia of the University of the West
Indies for the consistent work done in reviewing the manuscript.
Alexandre G 1991 Elevage présevrage des chèvres
Créoles. Revue Elevage Medecine Veterinaire Pays tropicaux (special
issue), 45 - 64
Alexandre G, Aumont G, Mainaud J C, Fleury J and Naves
M 1999 Reproductive performances of Guadeloupean Creole goats
during the suckling period. Small Ruminants Research 34,
155-160
Alexandre
G, Borel H, Matheron G and Remy C 1991 Elevages caprins en
Guadeloupe . Revue Elevage Medecine Veterinaire Pays tropicaux (special
issue), 27-40
Casey N H and
Van Niekerk WA 1988 The Boer goat: 1 Origin, adaptability,
performance testing, reproduction and milk production. Small
Ruminant Research 1, 291-302
Chemineau P 1983
Effect on oestrus and ovulation of exposing Creole goat to the
male at three times of the year. Journal of Reproduction
and Fertility 67, 65-72
Chemineau
P 1986 Influence de la saison sur l'activité sexuelle du
cabrit Créole mâle et femelle. Thèse de doctorat UST
Languedoc, pp 63
Chemineau P 1987
Possibilities for using bucks to stimulate ovarian and oestrus
cycles in anovulatory goats - a review. Livestock Production
Science 17, 135- 147
Chemineau
P, Cognie Y, Xande A, Peroux F, Alexandre G, Levy F, Shitalou E,
Beche JM, Sergent D, Camus E, Barre N and Thimonier J 1984
Revue Elevage Medecine Veterinaire Pays tropicaux 37, 225-238
Delgadillo J
A, Malpaux B and Chemineau P 1997 La reproduction des
caprins dans les zones tropicales et subtropicales. INRA
Productions Animales 10, 33-41
Devendra
C and Burns M 1983 Goat production in the Tropics.
Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux pp 183
Gonzalez-Stagnaro
C 1983 Comportamiento reproductivo de las razas locales de
rumiantes en el Tropico Americano In Reproduction des ruminants
en zone tropicale.(Editors: Chemineau P Gauthier D,
Thimonier J) 8-10 Juin 1983 Pointe-à-Pitre Guadeloupe INRA
Publications n° 20 , 1-80
Hussain
S S, Horst P and Islam A B M M 1995 Effect of different
factors on pre-weaning survivability of Black Bengal kids. Small
Ruminant Research 18, 1-5
Knights
M and Garcia G W 1997 The status and characteristics of the
goat (Capra hircus) and its potential role as a
significant milk producer in the tropics: a review. Small
Ruminant Research 26, 203-215
Kochapakdee
S, Pralomkarn W, Saithanoo A, Lawpetchara A and Norton B W 1994
Grazing management studies with Thai goats. II Reproductive
performances of different genotypes of does grazing improved
pasture with or without concentrate supplementation. Asian-australasian
Journal of Animal Science 7, 563-570
Le
Gal O and Planchenault D 1993 Utilisation des races caprines
exotiques dans les régions chaudes Contraintes et intérêts. CIRAD-EMVT
pp 261
Lindsay
D R, Martin G B and Williams I H 1993 Nutrition and
reproduction In: Reproduction in domesticated animals (Editor:
King G J). World Animal Science Series, 459-491 Elsevier
Science Publishers Amsterdam
Mellado
M, Foote R H and Gomez A 1991 Reproductive efficiency
of Nubian goats throughout the year in Northern Mexico. Small
Ruminant Research 6,151-157
Montaldo H,
Juarez A, Berruecos J M and Sanchez F 1995 Performance of
local goats and their backcrosses with several breeds in Mexico.
Small Ruminant Research 16, 97-105
Morand-Fehr
P, Vilette Y and Chemineau P 1984 Effets des facteurs non
pathologiques sur la mortalité des chevreaux. In Proceedings les
maladies de la chèvre Niort France 9-11/octobre Les colloques de
l'INRA 28, 31-46
Osuagwuh A I A
1992 Effects of strategic feed supplementation during
pregnancy on birthweight and perinatal survival of West African
Dwarf kids. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 119, 123-126
Pépin
L 1994 Recherche de polymorphisme génétique chez les
caprins Applications à l'étude de la diversité des populations
au contrôle de filiation et à la résistance génétique à la
cowdriose Thesis Paris XI pp
SAS
1988 SAS user's guide Statistics. SAS Inst Inc Cary NC
Sherman
D M 1987 Causes of kid morbidity and mortality: an overview
In: Proc IVth International Conference on Goats Brasilia Brazil
Vol I, 335-354
Taneja
G C 1982 Breeding goat for meat production. Proceedings
of the IIIrd International Conference on Goat Production and
Disease Tucson Arizona 10-15 January 1982, 27-30
Terril C
E 1983 Ruminant meat production in the tropics. In: Reproduction des ruminants en zone tropicale (Editors: Chemineau P, Gauthier D and Thimonier J). INRA Publications 20, 391-398Walkden-Brown S W and Restall B J 1996 Environmental and social factors affecting reproduction. In VIth International Conference on Goats. 6-11 May 1996 Beijing China Vol 2, 762-775
Wilson R T and
Light D 1986 Livestock production in Central Mali: economic
characters and production indices for traditionally managed goats
and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 62, 567-575