Livestock Research for Rural Development 32 (9) 2020 LRRD Search LRRD Misssion Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Local feed resources as replacement for soybean meal in diets for growing Moo Lath pigs

Bounlerth Sivilai, Duangmany Volachith, Anusin Phompakdee1, Malavanh Chittavong and T R Preston2

Department of Livestock and Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, National University of Laos, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR
lerth_si@yahoo.com
1 Technical-vocational school, Division of Livestock and Fishery, Bokeo Province, Laos PDR
2 Centro para la Investigación en Sistemas Sostenibles de Producción Agropecuaria (CIPAV, Carrera 25 No 6-62 Cali, Colombia

Abstract

The aim of the research was to investigate available protein sources as replacement for soybean meal in diets of Moo Lath pigs. Sixteen growing Moo Lath pigs with average live weight of 12.3 ± 0.7 kg were housed in individual pens and assigned to four treatments replicated four times, according to a completely randomized design. The treatments were: soybean meal (SBM), rice distillers’ byproduct (RDB), brewers’ grains (BG) and ensiled taro foliage (ETF).

Dry matter intake, live weight gain and feed conversion were similar for RDB and SBM and superior to these traits in pigs fed BG and ETF as sources of protein. It is concluded that RDB can replace soybean meal in diets of growing Moo Lath pigs with no loss in performance

Key words: brewers’ grain, cassava, Colocasia esculenta, import substitution, protein, rice distillers’ byproduct, taro


Introduction

Replacing maize and soybean imports to developing countries is one way of responding to the emergencies of climate change and global loss of biodiversity (LRRD mission 2020). Two issues that have to be considered are: (i) availability of local resources to replace maize and soybean which are the basis of pig feeds globally; and (ii) strategies to make better use of the feed resources that are locally available but which may be of lower nutritional value than maize and soybean. In tropical countries, a potential alternative as an energy source is cassava root; while protein can be sourced locally as byproducts of industrial beer production (brewers’ grains) and locally-produced rice “wine” (rice distillers’ byproduct). Of the vegetative sources of protein, taro (Colocacia esculenta) is high-yielding (Sivilai et al 2016; Hang et al 2018) and highly digestible by Moo lath pigs (Sivilai and Preston 2017) and Mong Cai pigs (Malavanh et al 2006).

Of the issues to be considered in such a strategy, the choice of breed is an important factor. Native pigs in Vietnam (Mong Cai) were shown to be better adapted to diets based on forages than were pigs of the genetically superior “Large White” (Duyet et al 2010; Rodríguez and Preston 1996). The popularity of the indigenous Moo Lath breed by small-scale farmers in Laos is another indication of “superior” adaptation to feeding systems based on local resources (Sivilai et al 2016, 2019)

The following experiment was designed to respond to the above mentioned issues by evaluating locally available protein sources as replacement for soybean meal in diets of growing Moo Lath pigs.


Materials and methods

Experimental design

Sixteen growing Moo Lath pigs with average live weight of 12.3 ± 0.7 kg were housed in individual pens and assigned to four treatments replicated four times, according to a completely randomized design. The treatments were: soybean meal (SBM), rice distillers’ byproduct (RDB), brewers’ grains (BG) and ensiled taro foliage (ETF).They were fed a basal diet of ensiled cassava root (ECR) and different sources of protein: soybean meal (SBM) as control diet, rice distillers’ by products (RDB), brewers’ grains (BG) and ensiled taro foliage (ETF).

Feed resources

Cassava roots were purchased from farmers. They were cleaned and chopped prior to conservation as silage. Rice distillers’ by product was collected from the stallholders’ wine distilleries, located in Xaythany district, Vientiane capital. Brewers’ grain was available in the factory of “Lao beer”. The taro foliage (leaves and petioles) were harvested from waste water lagoons in the outskirts of Vientiane city. They were chopped, wilted under shade for 12 hours and ensiled in plastic sacks. The rice distillers’ by-product and brewers’ grains were also stored in plastic sacks prior to being fed to the pigs.

Feeding and management

The pigs were vaccinated against hog cholera, de-wormed with Ivermectin (1 ml/20 kg LW) and adapted to the new feeds for 12 days prior to collection of data. The daily allowances were prepared immediately prior to feeding at 7:30 am and 4:30 pm, water was freely accessed through nipple drinkers in each pen.

Data collection and proximate analysis

Feeds offered and refused were recorded daily and samples retained at -18°C until the end of the experiment when they were bulked on an individual animal basis for determination of DM, crude protein, crude fiber and ash according to AOAC (1990) procedures. The pigs were weighed every 14 days during the experiment. Average daily weight gain was determined by linear regression of weight (Y=kg) on time (X=days).

Statistical analysis

The data (feed intake, live weight change and feed conversion) were analyzed by the GLM option in the ANOVA program of the Minitab software (Minitab 2016). Sources of variation in the model were sources of protein, replicates and error.


Results

Chemical composition of basal diets (% DM basis)

Levels of protein were similar in the rice distillers’ byproduct and brewers’ grain, but much lower in the ensiled taro foliage. The crude fiber was higher in the brewers’ grain and ensiled taro foliage than in soybean meal with RDB having the lowest fiber level (Table 1).

Table 1. Chemical composition of diet ingredients (on DM basis except for DM which is on air-dry basis)

% DM

% CP

% CF

% Ash

Ensiled cassava root

43.0

2.8

3.7

4.3

Soybean meal

85.0

43.3

6.5

7.5

Rice distillers’ byproduct

6.0

23.8

3.7

12.9

Brewers’ grain

26.0

24.1

16

15.8

Ensiled taro foliage

12.0

16.6

17

2.8

Premix

94.0

-

​-

86.6



Table 2. Ingredients in the diets

​% as DM

SBM

RDB

BG

ETF

Ensiled cassava root

70.5

41.0

44.0

12.5

Soybean meal

28.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Rice distillers’ by product

0.0

57.5

0.0

0.0

Brewers’ grain

0.0

0.0

54.5

0.0

Ensiled taro foliage

0.0

0.0

0.0

86.0

Premix

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

Composition, % in DM

CP

14.0

14.0

14.0

14.0

DM

55.5

22.5

34.5

17.1

CF

4.4

3.6

10.3

15.0

Ash

6.4

10.5

11.8

4.2

Feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion

The intake of dry matter was higher in diets having the protein supplied by soybean meal or RDB (Table 3; Figure 1)). This was reflected in better growth (Figure 2) and feed conversion (Figure 3) in pigs fed RDB or soybean meal as the protein supplement. Poorest performance was when ensiled taro foliage was the protein source.

Table 3. Mean values for feed intake, live weight change and feed conversion in Moo Lath pigs fed ensiled cassava root and different sources of protein

BG

ETF

RDB

SBM

SEM

p

DM intake, g/d

738b

715b

935a

921a

6.95

<0.001

Intake, % LW

4.2b

4.3ab

4.4a

4.5a

0.07

<0.001

Live weight, kg

Initial

12.4

12.3

12.1

12.3

0.38

0.969

Final

30.6b

25.8c

41.8a

38.8a

1.01

<0.001

Daily gain, g

162b

119c

262a

234a

8.17

<0.001

Feed conversion

4.6b

6.0c

3.6a

4.0b

0.31

<0.001



Figure 1. Dry matter intake of Moo Lath pigs
fed different sources of protein
Figure 2. Live weight gain of Moo Lath pigs
fed different sources of protein


Figure 3. Feed conversion of Moo Lath pigs
fed different sources of protein


Discussion

Brewers’ grains (BG) and RDB supported similar increases in growth rate in Moo Lath pigs when fed at low levels of 4% of the diet (Sivilai et al 2017, 2018). However, when fed as the main source of protein, as in the present experiment, the RDB was plainly superior and led to improved growth performance. Due to RDB “Hem” mentioned in a high value of crude protein and abundant in amino acid (Manh et al 2009). At low levels it is hypothesized that both brewers’ grain and RDB function as sources of “prebiotic” (Sivilai et al 2019), derived from the beta glucan known to be present in the cell wall of barley (the case of brewers’ grains) and of yeast (the case of RDB). Identifying the respective roles of brewers’ grain and of RDB as prebiotics in the present experiment is not possible as it would have required the measurement of typical responses to prebiotics such as lowered pH in the cecum and the presence in this organ of short chain volatile fatty acids, acetic and butyric acids products of the fermentation of beta-glucan and related cell carbohydrates that are not digested by intestinal enzymes (García-Curbelo 2020).

RDB differs from brewers’ grain in that it is made exclusively from polished rice, containing only 2.8% protein in DM ( Feedipedia.org) thus the greater part of the protein in RDB must be derived from the yeast used in the fermentation. In contrast, brewers’ grain is usually made from barley having 11.3% protein (feedipedia.org). The conclusion from this comparison is that the balance of essential amino acids will be better in RDB than in brewers’ grain. The other characteristic of both RDB and brewers’ grains is that both appear to act as ”prebiotics” (Sivilai et al 2017). However, for this effect to be manifested the concentrations needed of both additives are only 4% of the diet (Sivilai et al 2018). It is not known if the “prebiotic” benefits from these supplements are still manifested when these feeds are included at the much higher levels (>50%) as in the present experiment.

On the basis of present knowledge, it would appear that the benefits of RDB over brewers’ grain in diets of growing pigs, are mainly due to the superior protein quality, coupled with the lower level of crude fiber in the RDB.


Conclusion


Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge support for this research from the Faculty of Agriculture (FAG), National University of Laos (NUoL) for co-research funds. Special thanks are given to Animal Science Students for their practical help, field work and laboratory assistance during experiment.


References

AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.15th edition (K Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230

Duyet H N 2010 Giant taro leaves (Alocasia macrorrhiza) for replacement of soybean meal in diets for Mong Cai sows in Central Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #149. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/8/duye22149.htm

Duyet H N and Preston T R 2013 Ensiled mixed foliage of taro leaves + petioles and banana pseudo-stems as replacement of rice bran for Mong Cai sows in small-holder farms in Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 25, Article #54. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/4/duye25054.htm

García-Curbelo Y, Bocourt-Salabarría R, Rodríguez-Sanchez B, Albelo-Dorta N, Albelo-González A, Herrera-Villafranca M and López-Pérez M G 2020 Prebiotic effects of agavins in poultry Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 32, Article #122. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd32/7/yanelys32122.html

Hang D T, Hai P V and Savage G 2018 Effect of variety, soil type and harvest interval on biomass yield and soluble and insoluble oxalates in taro (Colocasia esculenta L.) foliage. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 30, Article #80. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/5/hang30080.html

LRRD Mission 2020 LRRDmission.html

Malavanh C, Preston T R and Ogle B 2008 Effect of replacing soybean meal by a mixture of taro leaf silage and water spinach on reproduction and piglet performance in Mong Cai gilts. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 20, supplement. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/mala2.htm

Manh L H, Xuan Dung N N, Kinh L V, Binh T C, Thu Hang B P and Phuoc T V 2009 Composition and nutritive value of rice distillers’ by-product (hem) for small-holder pig production. Livestock Researchfor Rural Development. Volume 21, Article #224. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/12/manh21224.htm

Minitab 2016 Minitab reference Manual release 16 version. User’s guide to statistics. Minitab Inc. USA

Rodríguez L and Preston T R 1996 Comparative parameters of digestion and N metabolism in Mong Cai and Mong Cai*Large White cross piglets having free access to sugar cane juice and duck weed. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 8, Article #2. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd8/1/lylian.htm

Sivilai B and Preston T R 2017 A low concentration of rice distillers’ byproduct, or of brewers’ grains, increased diet digestibility and nitrogen retention in native Moo Lath pigs fed ensiled banana pseudo-stem (Musa spp) and ensiled taro foliage (Colocasia esculenta). Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 29, Article #123. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd29/6/lert29123.html

Sivilai B, Preston T R and Kaensombath L 2016 Feed intake, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention by Moo Lath pigs fed ensiled banana pseudo-stem (Musa spp) and ensiled taro foliage (Colocasia esculenta). Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #6. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/1/boun28006.html

Sivilai B and Preston T R 2017 Effect of level of dietary protein on growth and feed conversion of Moo Lath pigs fed a mixture of ensiled taro foliage (Colocasia esculenta) and of ensiled banana pseudo-stem (Musa spp). Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 29, Article #34. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd29/2/boun29034.htm

Sivilai B, Preston T R, Hang D T and Linh N Q 2018 Effect of a 4% dietary concentration of rice distillers’ byproduct, or of brewers' grains, on growth rate and feed conversion during pregnancy and lactation of native Moo Lath gilts and their progeny. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 30, Article #20. Retrieved July 11, 2020, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/1/lert30020.html

Sivilai B and Preston T R 2019 Rice distillers’ byproduct and biochar as additives to a forage-based diet for native Moo Lath sows during pregnancy and lactation. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 31, Article #151. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd31/10/sivil31151.html