Livestock Research for Rural Development 30 (8) 2018 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
Two growth trials involving crossbred (Large White x Landrace) starter pigs were conducted to compare performance and cost of feeding malted (MTD), fermented (FTD), fermented maize after malting (M&F) and unprocessed (CM) maize based diets. In the first trial, 64 pigs of four-to-six weeks of age weighing 6.14±1.3kg were allotted to sixteen groups of four balanced for sex and weight in a CRD consisting of four treatments and four replicates. Apparent digestibilityof diets were determined. In the second trial, 60 piglets were weaned at 4, 5, 6 and 8 weeks of age using FTD diets (which exhibited the best performance and gross margins in trial 1) and their performance followed up to 8 weeks of age.
Processing had no effect on the levels of CP, P and Ca. Fermentation, malting and fermenting malted maize increased the ash content of maize by 31, 26 and 4 percent respectively. Processing reduced digestible energy of maize by 121, 141 and 178 Kcal/kg respectively in malted, fermented and maize fermented after malting respectively. ADFI and ADG varied in a descending order of 0.726, 0.642, 0.554, 0.527 kg/day and 0.276, 0.244, 0.199, 0.158 kg/day for pigs fed on MTD, FTD, M&F and CM respectively. Feed conversion ratio was similar across all the diets. Apparent digestibility coefficient of DM differed but for CP, it was similar across treatments. These data indicate that using fermented maize in diets of starter pigs results in higher performance and reduced feed cost. Malted maize can be used for piglets of low weaning weights because of its ability to stimulate intake although at a higher cost. Increasing weaning age increased piglet performance. Weaning piglets at five weeks resulted in similar ADG as obtained when weaning is post-poned to 8weeks of age. Malted and fermented maize based diets are appropriate for weaning piglets as early as five weeks of age instead of the usual eight weeks and improve post-wean performance at low costs.
Key words: feed cost, piglets, post-wean performance
The post-weaning period is characterized by low feed intake, increased susceptibility to enteric diseases and poor growth (Sørensen et al 2009 and Naranjo 2010). Consequently, weaning is delayed to eight weeks of age due to lack of appropriate weaner diets that permit a smooth transition from suckling to solid feed. Continuous compared to restricted supply of nutrients modifies anatomy, morphology and improves digestibility in newly weaned pigs (Kelly et al 1991; Mahan et al 2004). However, the capacity of digestive enzymes to break down sugars, starch and proteins is variable and takes long before attaining full potential. As a result, the early weaned piglets’ digestive system is unable to adequately digest and absorb nutrients in diets based on cereal grains (Greg, 2002). Formulating weaner diets based on more palatable ingredients provides the means of improving palatability and feed intake at weaning (Solà-Oriol et al 2009). This study aimed at evaluating the effect of including malted and fermented maize in weaner diets on nutrient availability, feed intake, digestibility, growth rate, and its feed cost implications.
Maize was sorted, spread on and covered by sisal sacks. The malt was watered and turned twice a day to ensure uniform germination and adequate aeration. After a germination period of three days, the malt (with radicals still attached) was sun dried to a moisture content of 15%.
Milled maize was mixed with water in the ratio of 1:1 (w/v). The dough was fermented in gunny bags for 24 hours.The fermented dough was sun dried for 3-4 days to obtain a moisture content of 15%.
Part of the malted grain was milled and mixed with water (1:1w/v) to form a dough. The dough was fermented for 24 hours (1day) and sun dried to 15% moisture content. All diets were milled using a 2.5mm sieve before mixing it with other ingredients to make a balanced ration.
Table 1. Composition of experimental diets based on processed maize |
||||
Ingredients, kg |
MTD |
FTD |
M&F |
CM |
Malted maize |
61 |
- |
- |
- |
Fermented Maize |
- |
61 |
- |
- |
Fermented Malted maize |
- |
- |
61 |
- |
Whole Maize/Control |
- |
- |
- |
61 |
Fish Meal |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Cotton Seed Cake |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Dicalcium Phosphate |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Vitamin Mineral Premix |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Salt |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Total(kg) |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Chemical analysis# |
||||
DM (% air dry basis) |
90.6 |
90.6 |
91.9 |
90.4 |
Digestible Energy, Kcal/kg |
2322 |
2711 |
2461 |
2559 |
Crude protein, % |
17.1 |
17.4 |
17.4 |
17.1 |
Phosphorus, % |
1.26 |
1.04 |
1.10 |
1.24 |
Calcium, % |
0.0362 |
0.0328 |
0.0379 |
0.0299 |
# On DM basis except for DM which is on air-dry basis |
In trial 1, a total of sixty-four weaned Large White × Landrace piglets (thirty two males and thirty two females) of four-to-eight weeks of age weighing 6.14±1.3kg were used. Piglets were divided into sixteen groups balanced for sex and weight. The diets were randomly allocated to piglets in groups in a completely randomized design (CRD) consisting of four treatments and four replicates. The cost of diets was calculatedbasing on the cost of materials, labor and milling expenses.
In trial 2, based on performance and cost evaluations in trial 1, fermented maize (FTD) based weaner diet was selected. Three piglets from each litter where weaned at 4 (Trt1), 5 (Trt2), 6(Trt3) and 8 (Trt4 = control) weeks of age and fed on FTD for up to 8 weeks.
Data collected in trial 1 and 2 were subjected to ANOVA using the GLM procedure of SAS (2003). Treatment means were separated using the LSD.
The model used was
Yij = µ +Ti + eij
Where; Yij = Response variable (e.g. ADG, ADFI, FCR); µ = General mean; Tij= Effect of diet (Trial 1) or Effect of weaning age (Trial 2); eij = Random error.
At the end of trial 1, four intact male pigs weighing 26.6±2.63kg were used to determine digestibility. Pigs were housed individually in locally designed wooden cages with a 60cm clearance from the ground and allowing quantitative total collection of faeces. A 4´4 Latin square change-over arrangement of treatments with 4 pigs and 4 periods was used. The 10day periods consisted of 5 days of adaptation and 5days of data collection. Data were subjected to ANOVA using GLM procedures of SAS. Treatment means were separated using the LSD.
The linear model used was:
уijk =µ+TI +rj+ ϒ + eijk
Where yijk = dependent variable of diet i in period j and given to animal k; µ = overall mean; T i = effect of diet I; rj = effect of period j; ϒk= effect of animal (pig) k and eijk = residual effect
The effect of processing on the chemical composition of maize is summarized in Table 2. Fermentation, malting and fermenting malted maize increased the ash content of maize by 31, 26 and 4 percent respectively. The increase in ash content of maize reported by Traore' et al (2004) is evidence that the levels of major minerals; that is calcium and phosphorus rise upon malting. Bohn et al (2008) and Sokrab et al (2012) reported an increase in phosphorus and calcium content of low and high phytate genotypes of maize respectively upon germination. The two processes of malting and fermentation resulted in non-significant levels of calcium. Sokrab et al (2012) reported an increase in hydrochloric acid extractable calcium at the expense of total calcium within four days of germination. Malting, fermenting, and fermentation after malting reduced the digestible energy of maize by 121, 141 and 178 Kcal/kg respectively. The rise in temperature and carbondioxide given off during germination explain the decline in the energy levels of malted maize (Chavan and Kadam, 1989). The reduction in energy could also be explained by the loss of energy rich lipids during germination (Traore' et al 2004). The conversion of sugars to lactic acid, carbon dioxide and ammonia during fermentation also explains the reduction in the energy value of fermented maize based diets (Canibe and Jensen, 2012).
Table 2. Chemical composition of processed maize (as is basis) |
||||||
Malted |
Fermented |
Fermented |
Control/Whole |
SEM |
p |
|
Crude protein, % |
9.1 |
8.8 |
8.3 |
10.5 |
0.67 |
0.27 |
Total Phosphorus, % |
0.672 |
0.583 |
0.554 |
0.453 |
0.18 |
0.56 |
Calcium, % |
0.0342 |
0.0381 |
0.0222 |
0.0351 |
0.011 |
0.61 |
DE, kcal/kg |
4195b |
4175c |
4138d |
4316a |
0.65 |
0.0001 |
Ash, % |
1.67b |
1.80a |
1.29c |
1.24d |
0.006 |
0.0001 |
DM, % |
89.6b |
90.1a |
88.1d |
88.7c |
0.050 |
0.0001 |
Means in the same row with the same superscripts are not significantly different |
Processed maize based diets improved performance of weaned piglets compared to unprocessed maize based diets (Table 3). Piglets fed on malted maize based weaner diet (MTD) attained the highest live weight at 8weeks while piglets that were fed the control (CM) diet attained the lowest. Feeding MTD increased average daily feed intake (ADFI) and average daily gain (ADG) by 27 and 43 percent respectively. Feeding FTD increased ADFI and ADG by 18 and 35 percent respectively. The higher feed intake associated with malted maize can be attributed to the sweet taste of simple sugars that accumulate during malting. Malting increases the soluble sugars in maize which then impart the sweet taste responsible for higher feed intake of malt based weaner diets (Traore' et al 2004). Traore' et al (2004), recorded an increase in primary (glucose and fructose) and secondary (sucrose) sugars during malting. Canibe et al (2007) reported that fermenting cereal grain alone as opposed to fermenting the compound feed resulted in higher average daily gains. This is due to elimination of microbial degradation of free amino acids that occurs on fermentation of compound feeds. A study by Canibe and Jensen (2003) showed that fermented feed resulted in reduced average daily gain and feed intake as opposed to non-fermented dry feed. However, it improved feed efficiency and reduced enterobacteria along the pig’s gastro intestinal tract. The cause of these conflicting results is probably attributed to feeding fermented liquid feed and fermentation of the compound feed as opposed to fermented dry feed of which only maize grain is fermented. Also, the differences seen with fermentation may be due to use of spontaneous fermentation in the current study as opposed to fermentation using starter microbial cultures used in other studies. The positive influence of fermentation on the absorption mechanism of piglets induces higher feed intake and growth (Scholten et al 1999). The improved performance of piglets fed on fermented cereal based diets is explained by an increase in the surface area of the absorptive mechanism in the small intestine due to elongation of the villi and associated high villu:crypt ratio (Scholten et al 2002). There was no difference (P > 0.05) in the FCR among treatments. Malting, fermentation and fermentation of malted maize to make MTD, FTD and F&M respectively increased the unit cost of diets by 25%, 9% and 34% respectively. The high cost of M&F is due to the combined procedures of malting and fermentation that increase labor expenses. The cost of processing maize was the major differentiating factor in the calculation of feed cost.
Table 3. Mean values for performance of piglets fed on processed maize based weaner diets |
||||||
MTD |
FTD |
F&M |
CM |
SEM |
P |
|
Mean Initial weight, kg |
6.25 |
6.51 |
6.25 |
5.81 |
0.49 |
0.86 |
Mean Final weight, kg |
23.6a |
21.3ab |
18.8ab |
15.8b |
2.15 |
0.21 |
ADFI, kg/day |
0.726a |
0.642b |
0.554c |
0.527c |
0.023 |
0.00013 |
ADG, kg/day |
0.276a |
0.244ab |
0.199ab |
0.158c |
0.030 |
0.17 |
FCR, Feed/Gain |
4.06 |
4.03 |
4.72 |
4.29 |
0.65 |
0.90 |
Cost of Diet/Kg, Ug. Shs |
1,464 |
1,274 |
1,564 |
1,169 |
||
Means in the same row with the same superscripts are not different at p<0.05 |
Performance of piglets weaned at different ages and fed on fermented maize (FTD) is summarized in Table 5. There was a difference in ADFI, ADG and FCR among piglets weaned at different ages. Performance in terms of daily feed intake and growth of piglets at different ages of weaning was much lower than that stated by NRC, (1998). The low performance in the current study is probably due to the low initial live-weight, feed intake and protein content of diets. Piglets weaned at 4 and 5 weeks of age exhibited high feed intake but low feed efficiency (P < 0.05). Mahan (1993) also noted that early weaned light piglets are associated with low weight gain and feed efficiency as compared to heavy piglets. According to (NRC, 1998), feed intake increases linearly during the post-wean period. There was no difference in ADG of piglets weaned at five weeks and those weaned at eight weeks of age (P > 0.05). There was a difference (P < 0.05) in FCR among treatments. FCR improved with increment in weaning age. Weaning at week eight produced the highest FCR while weaning at week four produced the lowest FCR. Weaning at week 5 resulted in improved performance in terms of daily gain and better feed efficiency as compared to weaning at 4 weeks of age. Increasing weaning age increases post-weaning weight gain in addition to reduced chances of mortality (Main et al 2004).
Table 4. Mean values for daily feed intake, weight gain and feed
conversion ratio of piglets |
||||||
|
Week 4 |
Week 5 |
Week 6 |
Week 8 |
SEM |
P |
ADFI, kg/d# |
0.173a |
0.189a |
0.0974b |
0.0993b |
0.024 |
0.62 |
ADG, g/d# |
88.3b |
93.8a |
74.2c |
94.3a |
0.081 |
0.08 |
FCR (Feed/Gain) |
3.21c |
2.14b |
1.58a |
1.65a |
0.121 |
0.27 |
Means in the same row with the same superscripts are not different at p<0.05 # on air-dry basis |
The apparent digestibility coefficients of two major dietary components by pigs fed MTD, FTD, M&F and CM are summarized in Table 5. The apparent digestibility coefficients of DM differed among the four diets (P < 0.05). The apparent digestibility coefficient of CP was similar across the four diets (P > 0.05). Jørgensen et al (2010) found increases of 3 and 1 percentage units in dry matter digestibility for fermented barley and wheat-based diets respectively. Hong and Lindberg, (2007) did not find any improvement in the digestibility of protein and organic matter upon fermentation. However, Elyas et al (2002) reported an increase in protein digestibility upon fermentation to a maximum value within 24 hours of fermentation.
Table 5.
Apparent digestibility coefficients of dietary components by
pigs |
||||||
Nutrient |
MTD |
FTD |
M&F |
CM |
SEM |
P |
DM |
67.9b |
73.2a |
73.5a |
68.3b |
2.34 |
0.72 |
CP |
71.2 |
72.5 |
72.1 |
70.7 |
4.58 |
0.26 |
Means in the same row with the same superscripts are not different at p<0.05 |
Bohn L, Meyer A S and Rasmussen S K 2008 Phytate: impact on environment and human nutrition. A challenge for molecular breeding. A review. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 9(3): 165-191.
Canibe N and Jensen B B 2003 Fermented and non fermented liquid feed to growing pigs: Effect on aspects of gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance. Journal of Animal Science, 81: 2019-2031.
Canibe N and Jensen B B 2012 Fermented liquid feed—Microbial and nutritional aspects and impact on enteric diseases in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 173: 17-40.
Canibe N, Højberg O, Badsberg J H and Jensen B B 2007 Effect of feeding fermented liquid feed and fermented grain on gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance in piglets. Journal of Animal Science, 85: 2959–2971.
Chavan J and Kadam S S 1989 "Nutritional improvement of cereals by sprouting." Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 28(5): 401-437.
Elyas S H A, Abdullahi El Tinay H, Nabila and Yousif E and Elsiddig Elsheikh A E 2002 Effect of natural fermentation on nutritive value and in vitro protein digestibility of pearl millet. Food Chemistry, 78: 75–79.
Greg Simpson 2002 High-quality Post-weaning Diet is Critical to Piglet's Transition to Grain-based Diet. Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs. Ontario.
Hong T T T and Lindberg J E 2007 Effect of cooking and fermentation of a pig diet on gut environment and digestibility in growing pigs. Livestock science, 109:135-137.
Jørgensen H, Sholly D, Øyan Pedersen A, Canibe N and Knudsen Erik Bach K 2010 Fermentation of cereals — Influence on digestibility of nutrients in growing pigs. Livestock Science, 134:56–58. Retrieved June 06, 2018, from http://www.prairieswine.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/LS-Jorgensen3-2010.pdf
Kelly D, Smyth J A and Mc Cracken K J 1991 Digestive development of the early-weaned pig. 2. Effect of level of food intake on digestive enzyme activity during the immediate post-weaning period. British Journal of Nutrition, 65(2):181-8.
Mahan D C 1993 Effect of weight, split-weaning, and nursery feeding programs on performance responses of pigs to 105 kilograms body weight and subsequent effects on sow rebreeding interval.Journal of Animal Science, 71:1991-1995.
Mahan D C, Fastinger N D and Peters J C 2004 Effects of diet complexity and dietary lactose levels during three starter phases on post weaning pig performance. Journal of Animal Science, 82: 2790-2797.
Main R G, Dritz S S, Tokach M D, Goodband R D and Nelssen J L 2004 Increasing weaning age improves pig performance in a multisite production system. Journal of Animal Science, 82: 1499–1507.
Naranjo V D 2010 Carbohydrate sources and maximizing the use of supplemental amino acids in diets for weanling pigs. PhD dissertation, Louisiana State University.Agricultural and Mechanical College.
NRC 1998 Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Scholten R H J, van der Peet-Schwering C M C, den Hartog L A, Balk M, Schrama J W and Verstegen M W A 2002 Fermented wheat in liquid diets: effects on gastrointestinal characteristics in weanling, Journal of Animal Science, 80:1179–1186.
Scholten R H J, van der Peet-Schwering C M C, Verstegen M W A, den Hartog L A, Schrama J W and Vesseur P C 1999 Fermented co-products and fermented compound diets for pigs: A review. Animal Feed Science Technology, 82:1–19.
Sokrab A M, Mohamed Ahmed I A and Babiker E E 2012 Effect of germination on antinutritional factors, total, and extractable minerals of high and low phytate corn (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 11: 123–128.
Solà-Oriol D, Roura E and Torrallardona D 2009b Use of double-choice feeding to quantify feed ingredient preferences in pigs. Livestock Science, 123: 129–137.
Sørensen M T, Vestergaard E M, Jensen S K, Lauridsen C and Højsgaard S 2009 Performance and diarrhoea in piglets following weaning at seven weeks of age: Challenge with E. coli O 149 and effect of dietary factors. Livestock Science, 123: 314–321.
Traore' T, Mouquet C, Icard-Vernie're C, Traore' A S and Tre'che S 2004 Changes in nutrient composition, phytate and cyanide contents and a-amylase activity during cereal malting in small production units in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Food Chemistry, 88:105–114.
Received 4 June 2018; Accepted 18 June 2018; Published 1 August 2018