Livestock Research for Rural Development 26 (6) 2014 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
Ten crossbred gilts (Large White*local breed), with an average body weight of 122±4.62 kg were mated by AI with semen from a Pietrain boar and followed for one complete reproductive cycle, during which they received diets of rice bran replaced by ensiled Taro (Colocacia ensiformis) foliage at levels (DM basis) of 0, 15, 30, 45 and 60% . The experimental diets were offered three weeks after mating. Feeding was 2% of live weight (DM basis) during pregnancy and ad libitum during lactation.
There were curvilinear responses in intake of DM and crude protein during gestation and lactation with the maximum values recorded with 30% taro foliage silage in the diet DM. Weight gain of the gilts during pregnancy increased as taro foraage silage was raised to the 30% level with no further increase up to 60% taro silage. Feed conversion ratio showed a positive linear response to level of taro foliage silage. Less live weight was lost during lactation as rice bran was replaced by with ensiled taro foliage, with optimum values at 45 and 60% levels of ensiled taro foliage in the diet. The number of piglets born was lowest on the 100% rice bran diet and highest with 60% replacement by Taro silage. The total litter weight at birth did not difffer among treatments as weights of the piglets reflected the size of the litter. Litter weights at weaning did not differ among treatments. Overall feed conversion (feed consumed during gestation and lactation per kg piglet weaned) appeared to improve as the proportion of taro silage in the diet was inceased.
Diets composed of approximately equal parts (DM basis) of ensiled taro foliage and rice bran supported satisfactory reproduction and lactation in crossbred gilts.
Key words: foliage silage, rice bran
Pig production for small producers is usually a secondary source of family income, and used for festive events, paying a debt or as a savings bank. It is concentrated in rice growing areas because it is dependent on by-products from rice such as rice bran and broken rice. The constraint to use of these energy-rich byproducts is the need for protein supplements, which in conventional form (soybean meal and fish meal) are difficult to acquire in rural areas as well as being expensive. For this reason emphasis has been put on the use of protein-rich foliages which can be grown by the farmer ( http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/content.htm). Taro (Colocasia esculenta L Shott) is found growing in the wild state in mountain areas, in forests and in ponds and other water surfaces (Pham Sy Tiep et al 2006; Ngo Huu Toan and Preston 2007; Pheng Buntha et al 2008). The survey in Cambodia by Pheng Buntha et al (2008) indicated that farmers grew taro mainly for tuber production but they occasionally fed the leaves and petioles to their pigs. Cooking of the taro foliage was considered to be necessary in view of the irritation (itching) on the skin and in the mouth of the pigs caused by contact with the fresh leaves.
The objective in the study was to evaluate the effect of different levels of ensiled taro foliage replacing diet rice bran on performance of gilts during pregnancy and lactation .
The experiment was carried out in the Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid), located in Phras Teat village, Sangkat Rolous, Khan Dankor, about 25km from Phnom Penh City, Cambodia.
Ten crossbred (Large white x Local breed) gilts , with an average live body weight of 122±4.62 kg were housed in individual pens with concrete floor. The experiment was done according to a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 5 treatments and 2 replications of each treatment. The gilts were were mated by AI with semen from the Pietrain boar and followed for one complete reproductive cycle. The experimental diets were offered three weeks (21 days) after mating.
The treatments (n DM basis) were:
Table 1: Planned composition of the diets, % DM basis (based on prior analysis of the ingredients) |
|||||
|
Level of taro foliage silage |
||||
Ingredients |
0 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
Taro foliage silage |
0 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
Rice bran |
98.5 |
83.5 |
68.5 |
53.5 |
38.5 |
Limestone |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Salt |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Composition |
|||||
Dry matter, % |
86.7 |
75.7 |
64.7 |
53.7 |
42.7 |
Crude protein, % in DM |
10.2 |
11.3 |
12.4 |
13.5 |
14.7 |
Taro foliage was harvested from natural ponds in the area. It was chopped (2-3cm) by hand and dried for one to two days to reducedthe moiture and then ensiled without additives. It was stored for one month before being fed. Rice bran was purchased from the local rice mill sconidered to be of low quality); calcium carbonate and salt were purchased from an animal feed shop in Phnom Penh. Diets were offered at 2% of live weight (DM basis) during pregnancy and ad libitum during lactation. The rice bran and minerals were mixed together and fed first prior to feeding taro foliage silage.
The gilts were weighed at intervals of 2 weeks during pregnancy and farrowing until the end of lactation which was for 42 days). The piglets were weighed at birth and then every week until weaning at 42 days. Feed intake was recorded during the gestation and lactation periods. Litter size at birth, birth weight, weaning weight, mortality (at birth and weaning), and live weight changes of the gilts during lactation were calculated.
Taro foliage silage, rice bran, limestone and salt were analyzed for DM by oven drying at 60C for 48h. Nitrogen (N) was determined according to AOAC (1990).
Analysis of variance was performed using the general linear models of Minitab software (Minitab release 16.1.1, 2010). Sources of variation were treatments and error. When the F-test was significant at P<0.05, pair wise comparisons were performed using Turkey’s procedure (Minitab Statistical Software). The model used was:
Yij = μ + Ti + eij
Where, Yij = Dependent variables
μ = overall mean
Ti = treatment effect (i=1-2)
eij = random error
Linear and curvilinear regressions were calculated using Microsoft Office-Excel software.
The crude protein in taro foliage silage was slightly higher than we have reported previously (eg: 17%; Chhay Ty et al 2014) and confirms its value as a protein-rice supplement to be fed along with rice bran.
Table 2: Chemical composition of ingredients (as fed for DM and on DM basis for crude protein) |
||
Ingredient, |
% Dry matter |
% Crude protein |
Taro foliage silage |
11.6 |
19.3 |
Rice bran |
88.6 |
10.5 |
Calcium carbonate |
95.4 |
- |
Salt |
92.8 |
- |
There were curviline responses in intake of DM and crude protein during gestation and lactation with the maximum values recorded with 30% taro foliage silage in the diet DM (Tables 3 and 4; Figures 1 and 2).
Table 3 : Mean value sof feed intake in gestation of gilts fed rice bran replaced by ensiled taro foliage |
|||||||
|
Level of taro foliage silage, % in diet DM |
||||||
Ingredients, g/day |
0 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
SEM |
Prob |
Taro foliage silage |
0 |
408 |
826 |
1089 |
1265 |
18.6 |
<0.001 |
Rice bran |
2723a |
2335b |
2196c |
1474d |
1063e |
18.6 |
<0.001 |
Shell |
28a |
28a |
32b |
28a |
28a |
0.25 |
<0.001 |
Salt |
14a |
14a |
16b |
14a |
14a |
0.13 |
<0.001 |
Total intake, g/day |
2765a |
2785a |
3070b |
2605c |
2370d |
31.1 |
<0.001 |
Intake, g/kg live weight |
20.0a |
19.9a |
19.2b |
18.9b |
16.9c |
0.11 |
<0.001 |
Crude protein intake, g/d |
285a |
323.9b |
390.0c |
364.9d |
355.8d |
4.77 |
<0.001 |
As % in the diet |
|||||||
Taro foliage silage |
0 |
14.6 |
26.5 |
41.2 |
51.7 |
0.38 |
<0.001 |
Crude protein |
10.3a |
11.6b |
12.7c |
13.9d |
14.8e |
0.04 |
<0.001 |
abcde Means within main effects within rows with different common letter are different at P<0.05 |
Table 4: Mean value of feed intake during lactation of gilts fed rice bran replaced by ensiled taro foliage |
|||||||
|
Level of taro foliage silage |
||||||
Ingredients, g/day |
0 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
SEM |
Prob |
Taro foliage silage |
0 |
412 |
1172 |
1395 |
1531 |
33.9 |
<0.001 |
Rice bran |
3476a |
3924b |
3574a |
2170c |
1084d |
56.4 |
<0.001 |
Shell |
43a |
45ab |
46b |
36c |
27d |
0.66 |
<0.001 |
Salt |
21a |
22a |
24b |
18c |
13d |
0.33 |
<0.001 |
Total intake, g/day |
3540a |
4403b |
4816c |
3619a |
2655d |
72.5 |
<0.001 |
Intake, g/kg live weight |
25.8a |
31.8b |
28.2c |
24.9a |
20.0d |
0.62 |
<0.001 |
Crude protein intake, g/d |
358a |
482b |
591c |
489b |
402d |
9.29 |
<0.001 |
As % in the diet DM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taro foliage silage |
0 |
9.08 |
23.8 |
38.1 |
57.2 |
0.51 |
<0.001 |
Crude protein |
10.1a |
10.9b |
12.2c |
13.5d |
15.1e |
0.03 |
<0.001 |
abcde Means within main effects within rows with different common letter are different at P<0.05 |
Figure 1: Effect of replacing rice bran with ensiled taro foliage on DM intake during pregnancy |
Figure 2: Effect of replacing rice bran with ensiled taro foliage on CP intake during pregnancy |
Figure 3: Effect of replacing rice bran with ensiled taro foliage on DM intake during lactation |
Figure 4: Effect of replacing rice bran with ensiled taro foliage on CP intake during lactation |
The live weight gain of the gilts during pregnancy showed a curvilinear response to level of taro silage with the optimum at 30% replacement of the rice bran by taro foliage silage and no further change with up to 60% replacememt (Table 5; Figures 5 and 7). Feed conversion ratio showed a positive linear response to level of taro foliage silage (Figure 6).
Table 5: Mean value of live weight change in gestation sow fed replacing of rice bran by different levels of ensiled taro foliage |
|||||||
|
Level of taro foliage silage in diet DM, % |
||||||
|
0 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
SEM |
Prob |
Body weight, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At mating |
126 |
122 |
129 |
119 |
115 |
12.9 |
0.930 |
At farrowing |
152 |
148 |
162 |
151 |
147 |
12.1 |
0.912 |
Change in gestation |
26.0 |
26.5 |
33.0 |
32.0 |
33.0 |
4.65 |
0.691 |
Gestation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily weigh gain, g |
266 |
326 |
395 |
360 |
379 |
33.2 |
0.183 |
DM feed conversion |
10.4 |
8.70 |
7.93 |
7.28 |
6.21 |
1.09 |
0.226 |
Length of pregnancy, days |
113 |
112 |
114 |
114 |
113 |
0.22 |
0.006 |
Figure 5: Effect of replacing rice bran with ensiled taro foliage on weight cahnges during lactation |
Figure 6: Effect of replacing rice bran with ensiled taro foliage on DM feed conversion during lactation |
Figure 7: Effect on live weight change of the gilts during gestation with replacement of rice bran by ensiled taro foliage |
Loss of live weight during lactation was reduced by replacement of rice bran with ensiled taro foliage, with optimum values at 45 and 60% levels of ensiled taro foliage in the diet (Table 6; Figure 8).In part this benficial; effect of the taaro silage can be related to the increase in dietry protein supply (at the 45% substitution level the diet crude protein concentration had increased to 13% in DM compared with 10% in the diet of rice bran alone (Table 3)). The studies of O'Grady et al (1985) and Noblet et al (1990) support the importance of dietary protein level during lactation. Revel et al (1998) reported that sows offered a high protein diet during lactation (19.0% CP and 15.6 MJ DE/kg) lost only 4.3 kg during the four weeks of lactation (0.15 kg live weight loss/day), while those offered a low protein diet (7.9% CP and 15.5 MJ DE/kg as fed) lost on average 30.8 kg during lactation (1.1 kg/day).
Table 6: Mean values of live weight change in lactation of gilts fed rice bran replaced by different levels of ensiled taro foliage |
|||||||
|
Level of taro foliage silage, % in DM |
||||||
|
0 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
SEM |
Prob |
Live weight, kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After farrowing |
152 |
148 |
162 |
151 |
147 |
12.1 |
0.912 |
2 weeks |
143 |
141 |
157 |
146 |
140 |
11.5 |
0.835 |
4 weeks |
134 |
130 |
151 |
139 |
134 |
11.0 |
0.724 |
6 weeks (at weaning) |
124 |
125 |
145 |
134 |
129 |
11.4 |
0.721 |
Weight loss during lactation |
28.0a |
23.5ab |
17.5b |
17.0b |
18.5b |
1.46 |
0.012 |
Weight loss, g/day |
666a |
560ab |
417b |
405b |
441b |
0.03 |
0.012 |
ab Means within rows without common letter are different at P<0.05 |
Figure 8: Live weight loss of sow during lactation period fed rice bran replaced by different levels of ensiled taro foliage |
The number of piglets born was lowest on the 100% rice bran diet and highest with 60% replacement by Taro silage (Table 7; Figure 9). The total litter weight at birth did not difffer among treatments as weights of the piglets reflected the size of the litter. Litter weights at weaning did not differ among treatments (Figure 10) implying that milk production was not affected by the diet composition. This implication is supported by the overall feed conversion (feed consumed during gestation and lactation per kg piglet weaned) which did not differ among dietary treatments (Figure 11). The feed conversion for the diets with 45 or 60% ensiled tara foliage was some 50% poorer than that reported by Duyet and Preston (2013) for Mong Cai sows fed diets in which rice bran was replaced gradually by an ensiled mixture of banana pseudo-stem and taro foliage (DM conversion per piglet weaned was from 4 to 5 kg feed DM per kg piglet weaned). The use of gilts in the present experiment compared with 3rd parity sows used by Duyet and Preston (2013) is one explanation for this difference; the other is the known high fertility of the Mong Cai breed and its capacity to use forage-based diets (Duyet 2010; Duyet et al 2010; Duyet and Preston 2013).
Table 7: Mean values for piglet performance from gilts fed rice bran replaced by different levels of ensiled taro foliage |
|||||||
|
Level of taro foliage silage, % in diet DM |
||||||
|
0 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
SEM |
Prob |
At birth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total litter size* |
4.50a |
7.00b |
7.50b |
6.50b |
8.50c |
0.44 |
0.011 |
Total litter weight, kg |
9.05 |
9.45 |
10.1 |
11.7 |
11.6 |
0.81 |
0.197 |
Mean piglet live weight, kg |
2.00b |
1.35a |
1.35a |
1.80b |
1.40a |
0.12 |
0.036 |
At weaning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total litter size |
4.50a |
6.50b |
7.00b |
6.50b |
7.50b |
0.44 |
0.032 |
Total litter weight |
53.6 |
56.1 |
50.4 |
64.6 |
51.9 |
12.2 |
0.923 |
Mean piglet live weight, kg |
11.8 |
8.45 |
7.20 |
9.95 |
6.95 |
1.48 |
0.260 |
Feed DM,# kg/kg weaned piglet | 9.14 | 10.4 | 11.2 | 6.96 | 7.31 | 2.22 | 0.620 |
Survival rate |
100 |
92.9 |
93.8 |
100 |
88.2 |
4.25 |
0.351 |
* All piglets were alive at birth #Consumed by the gilt in pregnancy + lactation, kg |
Figure 9: Piglets born alive from gilts fed rice bran replaced by different levels of ensiled taro foliage |
Figure 10: Litter weight at weaning from gilts fed rice bran replaced by different levels of ensiled taro foliage |
Figure 11: Feed consumed by the gilt (pregnancy and lactation) per kg of piglet weaned |
The authors would like to express their gratitude to: the MEKARN project financed by SIDA; the Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid), for providing resources for conducting this experiment; and the students of Royal University of Agriculture for assistance in implementing this experiment.
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230
Chhay Ty, Khieu Borin and Preston T R 2014 Enzyme supplementation increases digestibility and N balance in growing pigs fed rice bran and ensiled taro foliage Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 26, Article #64. Retrieved , from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/4/chha26064.html
Duyet H N, Thuan T T and Son N D 2010 Effects on sow reproduction and piglet performance of replacing soybean meal by a mixture of sweet potato leaves, water spinach and fresh cassava foliage in the diets of Mong Cai and Yorkshire sows. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #59. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/3/duye22059.htm
Duyet H N 2010 Giant taro leaves (Alocasia macrorrhiza) for replacement of soybean meal in diets for Mong Cai sows in Central Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #149. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/8/duye22149.htm
Duyet H N and Preston T R 2013 Ensiled mixed foliage of taro leaves + petioles and banana pseudo-stems as replacement of rice bran for Mong Cai sows in small-holder farms in Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 25, Article #54. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/4/duye25054.htm
Minitab 2000 User's guide to statistics. Minitab Statistical Software Version 13.31, Minitab Inc., USA.
Ngo Huu Toan and Preston T R 2007 Evaluation of uncultivated vegetables for pigs kept in upland households. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 19, Article #150. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/10/toan19150.htm
Noblet J, Dourmad J Y and Etienne M 1990 Energy utilization in pregnant and lactating sows: Modeling of energy requirements. J. Anim. Sci. 68:562-572.
O'Grady J F, Lynch P B and Kearney P A 1985 Voluntary feed intake by lactating sows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 12:355-365.
Pham Sy Tiep, Nguyen Van Luc, Trinh Quang Tuyen, Nguyen Manh Hung and Tran Van Tu 2006 Study on the use of Alocasia macrorrhiza (roots and leaves) in diets for crossbred growing pigs under mountainous village conditions in northern Vietnam. Workshop-seminar "Forages for Pigs and Rabbits" MEKARN-CelAgrid, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 22-24 August, 2006. Article # 11. Retrieved July 15, 109, from http://www.mekarn.org/proprf/tiep.htm
Pheng Buntha, Borin K, Preston T R and Ogle B 2008 Survey of taro varieties and their use in selected areas of Cambodia. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 20, supplement. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/bunt1.htm
Revell D K, Williams I H, Mullan B P, Ranford J L and Smits R J 1998 Body composition at farrowing and nutrition during lactation affect the performance of primiparous Sows: I. Voluntary feed intake, weight loss, and plasma metabolites. Journal of Animal Science 76:1729-1737.
Received 21 May 2013; Accepted 21 April 2014; Published 1 June 2014