Livestock Research for Rural Development 20 (12) 2008 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Reproductive status following artificial insemination in Sanga cows in the Accra Plains of Ghana

F Y Obese, K A Darfour-Oduro, E Bekoe, B A Hagan and Y Gomda

CSIR-Animal Research Institute, P.O. Box AH 20, Achimota, Ghana
fyobese@yahoo.com

Abstract

The reproductive performance records of 126 Sanga cows bred through artificial insemination (AI) at the Amrahia Dairy Farm from January 1998 to December 2007 were assessed.

 

The intervals from calving to first AI service, calving to conception and calving interval were prolonged. They averaged 158.8 ±8.9 days, 177.5 ± 9.5 days and 517.9 ± 13.5 days respectively. These parameters were not affected (P>0.05) by season of calving preceding AI, season of insemination or sex of calf.  The conception rate at first AI service and for all inseminations were low 42.6 % and 46.0% respectively. They were not affected (P<0.05) by the season of insemination. Gestation length averaged 281.6 ±1.4 days. The mean birth weight of calves was 25.7 ± 0.3 kg. Male calves had higher birth weights than female calves (26.9 ±0.4 versus 24.5 ± 0.5 kg; P<0.05).

 

Improving the nutritional status of the cows through strategic supplementation coupled with effective heat detection mechanisms and appropriate timing of AI, as well as efficient methods of storage, transport and handling of semen should improve the reproductive performance of cows.

Key words: conception rate, calving interval, nutrition, postpartum anoestrus


Introduction

Artificial insemination (AI) is a breeding technique used in the improvement of livestock. In 1994 the Ministry of Food and Agriculture in Ghana commenced a five-year National Livestock Services Project with an objective to increase meat and milk production to meet the protein needs of the population as well as reduce the country’s increasing dependence on livestock and livestock products through breed improvement using AI.

 

Although AI has been applied in cattle as a means of accelerated genetic improvement of the indigenous stock in Ghana, the overall productivity of animals has continued to be low. Some of the factors that contribute to this include inadequate management practices, poor nutrition, occurrence of reproductive disorders, systemic diseases and parasites.

 

Low conception rate is a major factor affecting the success of AI. Low conception rates can be caused by several factors and their interactions including those related to the cow, management of animal, AI services, semen quality and bull fertility (Nordin et al 2007). Apart from these, reproductive events such as occurrence of oestrus, ovulation, conception and embryonic mortality also influences conception rates. For example the short duration of estrus and the tendency to show estrus during the night, greatly affect the efficiency of artificial insemination (AI) programs in B. indicus cattle managed in tropical areas (Baruselli et al 2004).

 

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of Sanga cows bred through AI at the Amrahia Dairy Farm in the Accra Plains of Ghana.  This would enable the development of measures to improve the efficiency of artificial insemination service provided at the Farm and also to smallholder farmers on the Accra Plains of Ghana. 

 

Materials and methods 

Location of study

 

The study was based on AI carried out between the period 1998-2007, on Sanga cows kept at the A.I Center of the Animal Production Departments’ Amrahia dairy farm located at Lat 05ş 46' N and Long 00ş 08'W  in the Accra Plains of Ghana. The mean monthly rainfall data in the area for the above period is presented in Figure 1. 


Figure 1.  Mean annual rainfall at the Amrahia dairy farm from January 1997 to December 2007


Total rainfall for the study period was 900.9 mm with an average daily temperature of 29oC.  Rainfall was bimodal with peaks in June and October.  April to July was the major rainy season, and September to November represented the minor rainy season. The driest months were January, February, March, August and December (Figure 1). 

 

Management of animals

 

The Sanga cows were grazed from 08.00 to 15.00 h on natural pastures comprising Panicum maximum, Stylosanthes haemata and Sporobolus pyramidalis which constitute the dominant grass species in the grazing area. They were not given any supplementary feed. The animals had access to water from a dam twice daily in addition to water provided in the animal house ad libitum. Oestrus (heat) was observed twice daily at 06:00h and 18:00 h. A cow standing to be mounted (standing heat) was used as the main criteria for the cow to be assumed to be on heat therefore ready for insemination. Cows observed to be on heat in the morning were inseminated in the evening of that same day, while those which demonstrated signs of heat in the evening were inseminated the following morning. Friesian semen was used for insemination.

 

Data collection

 

Artificial insemination records on 126 Sanga cows from the Amrahia dairy farm were used. The records covered a 10-year period (January 1998 to December 2007). Parameters studied include interval from calving to first AI service, interval from calving to conception, calving interval, conception rate, gestation length and birth weight of calves. The effect of season of calving preceding AI service, season of AI service and sex of calf on the above stated parameters were evaluated. Conception rate was estimated using the following equation:

 

 

Statistical analyses

 

The general linear models (GLM) procedure of the Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS 1999) was used in investigating days from calving to first AI, days from calving  to conception, gestation length, calving interval and birth weight of calf, and the effect season of calving preceding AI, season of insemination and sex of calf on these parameters. The following model was applied:

Yijk =µ + Si + Cj+Kk +eijk

Where:

Yijk= days from calving to first artificial insemination, days from calving to conception, gestation length, calving interval and birth weight of calf.

µ  = overall mean 

Si = effect of ith season of calving preceding AI

Cj= effect of the jth season of insemination; 

Kj = effect of kth sex of calf

eijk = a random error associated with each observation.

 

Differences between means were tested by LSMEANS. The effect of season of insemination on conception rate was assessed using the Chi-square test.

 

Results and discussion

 

Interval from calving to first AI service, interval from calving to conception and calving interval

 

The interval from calving to first AI, interval from calving to conception and calving interval, and the effect of season of calving or season of AI on these parameters are presented in Table 1.


Table 1.  Intervals from calving to first AI, calving to conception and calving intervals in Sanga cows (mean ± SE)

 

Interval from

Number
of records

Calving  interval,
days

Number
of records
Calving to 1st AI, days

Number
of records

Calving to
conception, days

Overall

71

159 ± 8.9

62

178 ± 9.5

79

518 ± 13.8

Season of calving preceding AI

 

 

 

 

 

 

Major rainy season

33

139 ± 13.7

27

158 ± 15.7

33

506 ± 23.1

Minor rainy season

14

184 ± 22.2

14

191 ± 22.5

16

512 ± 35.0

Dry season

24

154 ± 17.2

21

184 ± 18.3

30

536 ± 26.1

Season of Artificial insemination

 

 

 

 

 

 

Major rainy season

30

162 ± 16.4

28

181 ± 16.8

38

525 ± 24.8

Minor rainy season

13

149 ± 21.6

11

158 ± 23.0

18

495 ± 35.4

Dry season

28

166 ± 14.5

23

194 ± 16.1

23

534 ± 23.9

Sex of calf

 

 

 

 

 

 

Male

40

160 ± 13.2

35

179 ± 14.4

47

510 ± 19.9

Female

31

158 ± 14.4

27

176 ± 15.0

32

526 ± 23.8


The average interval from calving to first AI was prolonged and averaged 158.8 ± 8.9 days. This delay of first AI service after calving, particularly may be due to prolonged postpartum anoestrus (interval from calving to the resumption of ovarian cyclicity). This is most likely a result of inadequate nutrition (limited dietary energy and protein intake) and suckling management (Rutter and Randel 1984; Sasser et al 1988; Jolly et al 1995; Diskin et al 2003, Robinson et al 2006). Cows in this study were grazed on natural pastures. There was no supplementation of the cows with either crop residues, agro-industrial by-products or leguminous browse plants. During the dry season, the limited pasture available on the Accra Plains is of poor quality. In addition, there was lack of restriction on suckling by calves. 

 

Cows were allowed to suckle their young until they were weaned naturally between 6 to 9 months of age (Obese et al 1999; Okantah et al 1999; Okantah et al 2005). The low nutritional status of animals coupled with prolonged suckling stimulus could delay the resumption of ovarian cycles by interfering with the production and secretion of hormones important in ovarian follicular development and function in cattle. For example inadequate nutrition and suckling stimulus have been reported to reduce luteinising hormone pulsatility (Imakawa et al 1986; Williams et al 1996) and systemic concentrations of IGF-I (Nugent et al 1993; Roberts et al 1997) which are important in supporting the development, final maturation and ovulation of dominant follicles, leading to delayed ovulation and extended postpartum anoestrus period in cattle (Yavas and Walton 2000; Diskin et al 2003, Thatcher et al 2006).  The interval from calving to first AI service was not affected by season of calving preceding AI, season of AI or sex of calf.

 

The mean interval from calving to conception was 177.5 ±9.5 days and the calving interval was 517.9±13.8 days. These parameters were not affected (P>0.05) by season of calving preceding AI, season of insemination or sex of calf.  The calving to conception and calving intervals obtained in this study were higher than the 155.2±4.5 and 444.3±16.5 days respectively reported for the same breed on smallholder peri-urban dairy farms on the Accra Plains of Ghana (coastal savanna zone) (Obese et al 1999). It was also higher than the values of 149.7 ± 5.8 and 431±6.7 days reported for the same breed on smallholder farms in the humid forest zone in Ghana. The prolonged interval from calving to first AI obtained in the present study may have contributed to the extended calving to conception and calving intervals. Eduvie and Oyedipe (1991) have reported that the main determinant of long calving intervals is a prolonged postpartum anoestrous interval. Better management practices including improving the nutrition of cows by strategic feed supplementation especially during the dry season, as well as early weaning or restricted suckling of calves should shorten the postpartum anoestrous period and subsequently reduce calving to conception and calving intervals in these herds.

 

Gestation length

 

The gestation length obtained in this study was 281.6 ±1.4 days (Table 2).


Table 2.  Birth weight of calves and gestation length in Sanga cows (mean ± SE)

 

Number of records

Birth weight,
kg

Number
of records

Gestation length

Overall

134

25.7 ± 0.30

143

282 ± 1.4

Season of calving preceding AI

 

 

 

Major rainy season

52

25.8 ± 0.5

53

285 ± 2.3

Minor rainy season

23

25.6 ± 0.8

30

277 ± 3.5

Dry season

59

25.6 ± 0.5

60

278 ± 2.5

Season of AI

 

 

 

 

Major rainy season

60

25.5 ± 0.5

64

285± 2.5

Minor rainy season

23

25.8 ± 0.7

22

279 ± 3.6

Dry season

51

25.8 ± 0.5

57

281 ± 2.2

Sex

 

 

 

 

Male

78

26.9 ± 0.4a

84

284 ± 2.0

Female

56

24.5 ± 0.5b

59

279 ± 2.3

Means in the same column with  different superscripts (a,b) are significantly different (P<0.05)

AI= Artificial insemination


It was similar to the value of 281.6 ±1.7 days and also compared favourably with the value of 291.8 ±16.1 days reported for the same breed in Ghana by Osei et al (1993) and Obese et al (1999) respectively.  Gestation length was not affected (P>0.05) by season of calving preceding AI, season of AI or sex of calf.

 

Birth weight of calves

 

The mean birth weight of calves was 25.7±0.3 kg and was affected by sex of calf (Table 2). Male calves had higher birth weights than female calves (26.9 ±0.40 versus 24.5±0.5 kg; P<0.05). Male calves are generally reported to be heavier than their female counterparts at birth (Fall et al 1982).  According to Pabst et al (1977), a longer gestation period of about a day or two for male calves than female calves brings about the difference in birth weight.

 

Conception rate

 

The conception rate (CR) at first service was 42.6 %, and 46.0% for all services (Table 3). 


Table 3.  Conception rate of Sanga cows following Artificial Insemination

Parameter

1st service

All services

Services per
conception

Number served

Number
conceived

Conception
rate, %

Number served

Number
conceived

Conception
rate, %

Overall

258

110

42.6

352

162

46.0

2.17

Season of AI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Major rainy season

88

46

52.3

122

67

54.9

1.82

Minor rainy season

57

20

35.1

81

33

40.7

2.45

Dry season

114

44

38.9

149

62

41.6

2.40


The major reason for this low CR may to due to poor heat detection, inappropriate timing of AI, poor insemination technique or poor semen quality. The timing of insemination in relation to first detection of heat is critical for achieving high conception rates (Peters and Ball 1995; Tjiptosumirat et al 2007) as well as factors relating to the transport, storage, handling and thawing of semen in the field (Peters and Ball 1995). Although conception rate at first service or for all inseminations was not affected by the season of insemination, it however approached significance at (P=0.07), being higher in the major rainy season than in the minor rainy or dry season (Table 3). The abundant supply of good quality fodder during the major rainy season might have improved the body condition of cows thus improving their conception. Putting in place very effective heat detection mechanisms could result in reduction of undetected oestrus. Also, the appropriate timing of AI, coupled with good insemination technique and efficient methods of transport, storage, handling and thawing of semen should improve conception rate of cows.

 

Conclusion 

 

Acknowlegement 

Mr. Abdulai Mammah, Ebenezer Dodd, Stephen Xeflide and Mr. David Charway for their technical advice and recording of data for this work.

 

References 

Baruselli P S, Reis E L, Marques M O, Nasser L F and Bó G A 2004 The use of hormonal treatments to improve reproductive performance of anestrous beef cattle in tropical climates. Animal Reproduction Science 82-83: 479-486

 

Diskin M G, Mackey D R, Roche J F and Sreenan J M 2003 Effects of nutrition and metabolic status on circulating hormones and ovarian follicle development in cattle. Animal Reproduction Science 78: 345-370

 

Eduvie L O and Oyedipe E O 1991 Improving the management of reproduction of indigenous cattle in the semi-arid and sub-humid zones of West Africa. In Isotope and Related Techniques in Animal Production and Health, (IAEA,Vienna), pp 317-340

 

Fall A, Diop M, Sandford J, Wissocq Y J, Durkin J and Trail J C M 1982 Evaluation of the productivities of Djallonle sheep and N’dama cattle at Centre de Recherches Zootechniques, Kolda, Sénégal. ILCA Research Report No. 3. pp 9-39

 

Imakawa K, Day M L, Garcia-Winder M, Zalesky D D, Kittok R J, Schanbacher B D and Kinder J E 1986 Endocrine changes during restoration of estrous cycles following induction of anestrus by restricted nutrient intake in beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 63: 565-571 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/63/2/565

 

Jolly P D, McDougall S, Fitzpatrick L A, Macmillan K L and Entwistle K W 1995 Physiological effects of undernutrition on postpartum anoestrus in cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (Supplement) 49: 477- 492

 

Nordin Y, Zaini N and Wan Zahari W M 2007 Reproductive status following artificial insemination and factors affecting conception rate in dairy cows in smallholder production systems. In: improving the reproductive management of dairy cattle subjected to artificial insemination. Publication prepared under the framework of an RCA project with the technical support of the Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA, Vienna. pp 79-91 http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1533_web.pdf

 

Nugent R A, Jenkins T G, Roberts A J and Klindt J 1993 Relationship of postpartum interval in mature beef cows with nutritional environment biological type and serum IGF-I concentrations. Animal Production 56: 193-200

 

Obese F Y, Okantah, S A, Oddoye E O K and Gyawu P 1999 Post-partum reproductive performance of Sanga cattle in small-holder peri-urban dairy herds in the Accra plains of Ghana. Tropical Animal Health and Production 31: 181-190

 

Okantah S A, Obese F Y, Oddoye E O K, Gyawu P and Asante Y 1999 A survey on livestock and milk production characteristics of peri-urban agropastoral dairying in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 32: 39-46

 

Okantah S A, Obese F Y, Oddoye E O K,  Karikari P K, Gyawu P and Byant M J 2005 The effect of farm (herd) and season of calving on the Reproductive performance of Sanga cows in smallholder peri-urban dairy farms in the Accra plains. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science, (NARS Edition 1) 36-42

 

Osei S A, Karikari P K, Tuah A K, Gyawu P, Opoku R S, Asiamah M and Heathcote D C 1993 Studies on the reproductive performance of indigenous beef cattle raised on-farm in Ghana. In: improving the productivity of indigenous African Livestock. Results of FAO/IAEA/DGIS co-ordinated Research Programme Organised by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. IAEA,Vienna. pp 103-112.

 

Pabst W, Kilkenny J B and Langholz H J 1997 Genetic and environmental factors influencing calf performance in pedigree beef cattle in Britain. 1. The influence of environmental effects on birth, 200-day and 400-day weights. Animal Production 24: 29-39

 

Peters A R and Ball P 1995 Reproduction in Cattle, 2nd Edition, Blackwell Press, Oxford, U.K.

 

Roberts A J, Nugent R A, Klint J and Jenkins T G 1997 Circulating insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, growth hormone, and resumption of estrus in postpartum cows subjected to dietary energy restriction. Journal of Animal Science 75: 1909 -1917 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/75/7/1909

 

Robinson J J, Ashworth C J, Rooke J A, Mitchell L M and McEvoy T G 2006 Nutrition and fertility in ruminant livestock. Animal feed Science and Technology 126: 259-276

 

Rutter L M and Randel R D 1984 Postpartum nutrient intake and body condition effect on pituitary function and onset of oestrus in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 58: 265-264 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/58/2/265.pdf

 

SAS 1999 SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, version (Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC).

 

Sasser G R, Williams R J and Bull R C 1988 Postpartum reproductive performance in crude protein restricted beef cows: return to oestrous and conception. Journal of Animal Science 66: 3033-3039 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/66/12/3033

 

Thatcher W W, Bilby T R, Bartolome J A, Silvestre F, Staples C R and Santos, J E P 2006 Strategies for improving fertility in the modern dairy cow. Theriogenology 65: 30-44

 

Tjiptosumirat T, Tuasikl B J, Murni A P, Lelananingtyas, D. S. and Ariyanto A et al 2007 Improvement of the efficiency of artificial insemination services through the use of radioimmunoassay and a computer database application. In: improving the reproductive management of dairy cattle subjected to artificial insemination. Publication prepared under the framework of an RCA project with the technical support of the Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, IAEA, Vienna. pp 57-77 http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/te_1533_web.pdf

 

Williams G L, Gazal O S, Guzmán Vega G A and Stanko R L 1996 Mechanisms regulating suckling-mediated anovulation in the cow. Animal Reproduction Science 42: 289-297

 

Yavas Y and Walton J S 2000 Postpartum acyclicity in suckled beef cows: a review. Theriogenology 54: 25-55



Received 20 August 2008; Accepted 4 September 2008; Published 5 December 2008

Go to top