Livestock Research for Rural Development 19 (9) 2007 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Utilization of soybean milk residue, cowpea testa and corn starch residue by weaner rabbits

S M Odeyinka, A S Olosunde and O J Oyedele

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
smodeyinka@yahoo.co.uk   or   sodeyink@oauife.edu.ng

Abstract

In a fourteen week trial, fifty-six weaner rabbits comprising of New Zealand White, Chinchilla and California breeds of both sexes, aged 5-6weeks, and weighing 250.6g-596.0g were equally allotted to four experimental diets in a completely randomized design to evaluate and determine the utilization of soybean milk residue, cowpea testa (cowpea seed waste), corn starch residue and maize-groundnut-cake (a control diet) by rabbits.

There were no significant differences in the mean dry matter intakes of animals on the four diets. The mean dry matter intake (48.36g/day/animal) on the control maize-groundnut (CD) diet was lower than mean values of 48.84, 48.80 and 49.5g/day/animal, obtained by feeding soybean milk residue (SMRD), corn starch residue (CSRD) and cowpea testa (CTD) based diets respectively. Differences in the weight gains of animals on the four diets were not significant. Feed conversation ratio was 4.12, 4.08, 4.35 and 4.69 for animals fed CD, SMRD, CSRD and CTD, respectively.

There was no significant difference in hot dressing percentage. The dressing percentage was 52.5, 52.9, 53.3 and 51.3% for animals fed CD, SMRD, CTD and CSRD diets, respectively. The weights of the kidney, stomach, kidney fat, head, heart, lung and skin of rabbits on different diets were not significantly different (P>0.05) while the liver, caecum and small intestine were significantly different (P<0.05).

Weaner rabbits can utilize soybean milk residue, cowpea testa and corn starch residue without adverse effect on their performance. Soybean milk residue, corn starch residue and cowpea testa can replace maize and groundnut cake in the diet of weaner rabbits.

Keywords: corn starch residue, cowpea testa, soybean milk residue, weaner rabbit


Introduction

Inadequate animal protein in the diets of people in developing countries has called for the integration of some non-conventional protein sources into livestock production. Productivity of these livestock will depend to a large extent on their ability to utilize feeds that have no value in human feeding.

Rabbits have a number of characteristics that might be advantageous to smallholder subsistence type integrated farming system. The small body size, short generation interval, rapid growth rate, genetic diversity and high reproductive potentials are characteristics, which make rabbit suitable as meat producing small livestock in developing countries (Arijeniwa et al 2000). The nutrition of rabbit in Nigeria is primarily based on grasses (mainly Panicum maximum) and legumes (mainly Centrosema pubescens and Stylosanthes guianensis).Their growth and availability in the dry season cannot sustain all-year round rabbit production thus necessitating supplementation with cereal grains amongst others. Some studies have been carried out on the replacement or supplementation of cereal grains in rabbit pellet as alternative protein/energy source (Omole and Ajayi 1976) Cereal-based feeds are generally too expensive for use as supplements (Hulman 1988).

Little is known about the potential of cereal by-products and bean residues in rabbit nutrition. Raharjo et al (1986) however noted that cereal by-products have high digestible energy content for rabbits. Hence, this study was undertaken to evaluate the growth performance and carcass characteristics of weaner rabbits fed soybean milk residue, cowpea testa and corn starch residue.
 

Materials and methods

Animals and housing

The experiment was conducted at the Rabbit Unit of the Teaching and Research Farm, Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria. Fifty-six weaner rabbits comprising of New Zealand White, Chinchilla and California breeds of both sexes were used in this experiment. The animals were 5-6 weeks old and weighed between 250.6g-596.0g. They were randomly allotted to four treatments in a completely randomized design. The experimental animals were housed two per hutch, and maintained in cages with wire screen floors raised to a height of 90cm from the concrete. Row cages of size 76cm x 62cm x 42cm each were used.

Diets

Four rations were formulated in such a way that soybean milk residue (SMR), cowpea testa (CT) and corn starch residue (CSR) served as sources of nitrogen. The SMR, CT and CSR were made up of 20.5% each to replace 5% of GNC and 15.5% of maize in the control diet. The animals were fed 4% of their body weight on dry matter basis daily. The residues were prepared as described by Odeyinka et al (2003). Each residue was air dried for three days to reduce moisture content and formulated into an experimental diet, fed to the rabbits

Data collection

The animals were subjected to 14-day adaptation period. Growth and digestion trials lasted for 14 weeks. Each animal was weighed before the commencement of the experimental period and weekly throughout the period. The feed leftover was weighed to estimate the previous day's feed taken by each animal.

Carcass evaluation

Five rabbits per treatment were selected for postmortem studies after the completion of the experiment based on similarity in weight and were killed for carcass evaluation. Dislocating its neck, while the skin, head, stomach, kidney, kidney fat, intestine, liver, lungs, and heart were removed before weighing the carcass.

The small intestine and caecum (without the appendix) were measured while lying on a wet, coated plywood draining board, so as to avoid any artificial stretching. The stomach, small intestine and caecum were opened and the contents removed under a gentle flow of water, and then allowed to drain for sometime before weighing. Water or blood that may have adhered to the liver and kidney was removed with filter paper. The kidney fat (being a reasonable estimate of overall fatness) was also weighed.

Chemical and data analyses

The composition of the experimental diet is shown in Table 1.


Table 1.   Composition of experimental diets

Ingredients, % 

CD

SMRD

CSRD

CTD

Groundnut Cake (GNC)                             

5.00

-

-

-

Maize

15.5

-

-

-

Soybean milk residue (SMR)           

-

20.5

-

-

Corn starch residue (CSR)               

-

-

20.5

-

Cowpea seed residue (CTD)         

-

-

-

20.5

Wheat offal                                   

10.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

Palm Kernel Cake                        

50.0

50.0

50.0

50.0

Rice bran                                       

    10.0

10.0

10.0

10.0

Bone Meal                                    

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

Fish Meal                                     

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Salt    

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

Lysine                                         

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

Methionine

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

Total

100

100

100

100


Experimental diets and faeces were analyzed for proximate composition using the methods of AOAC (1990). All data obtained were statistically analyzed with the general linear model of SAS (1998) and the Duncan multiple range tests were used to detect significant differences among means.
 

Results and discussion

The chemical composition of the diets (Table 2) was satisfactory enough to meet the requirements of all stages of rabbits fed solely or compounded for rabbits ration (NRC 1977 and Lebas 1988).


Table 2.   Chemical composition of experimental diets

Parameters 

CD

SMRD

CSRD

CTD

Dry Matter

89.0

85.5

88.0

86.8

Analysis % of DM

 

 

 

 

Organic Matter 

88.9

90.2

91.4

87.6

Crude Protein

20.1

20.4

18.3

18.0

Crude Fibre

12.7

20.0

12.5

13.6

Ether Extract

8.35

4.27

9.94

6.37

Ash 

11.1

9.80

8.61

12.4

Nitrogen Free Extract 

47.8

45.5

51.0

50.2


Dry matter intake and weight gain

The dry matter intake g/day of the rabbits on different diets was not significantly different (P>0.05) (Table 3).


Table 3.  Mean dry matter intakes, weight gain (g/day) and feed conversion ratio of rabbits fed experimental diets over a period of 14 weeks

Parameter (mean)

CD

SMRD

CSRD

CTD

SEM

PROB

Dry matter intake, g/day

48.4

48.8

49.6

48.8

2.16

0.99

Initial weight, g

428

427

427

427

11.0

0.47

Final weight, g

1,596

1,618

1,516

1,524

30.6

0.16

Weight gain/day, g

11.8

12.0

11.40

10.4

0.52

0.94

Feed conversion ratio (intake/gain)

4.12

4.08

4.35

4.69

0.08

0.07


The mean dry matter intakes (g/day) of the weaner rabbits fed the experimental diets are shown in Table 3. The mean dry matter feed intakes was 48.36, 48.84, 49.56 and 48.80g for rabbits fed CD SMRD, CSRD and CTD diets respectively. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the mean dry matter intakes.

The mean daily weight gains (g/day) of the weaner rabbits fed the experimental diets are shown in Table 3. The mean daily weight gains were 11.75, 11.98, 11.40 and 10.40g/day/animal for rabbits fed supplementary CD, SMRD, CSRD and CTD respectively. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between the mean daily weight gains. Animals in all the treatments were in a positive weight balance. The highest daily weight gain was recorded for weaner rabbits fed the SMRD (11.98g per day), which was statistically similar (P>0.05) to what was obtained with those on other diets. CTD diet promoted the highest feed conversion ratio 4.96 (table 3) compared with SMRD, CSRD and CD diets though not statistically significant. The results agreed with the growth performance of rabbits reported from some tropical countries (Lukefahr and Cheeke 1990; Muir and Massaete 1996, Akinfala et al 2003 and Iyayi and Odueso 2003) but lower than those reported by Sarwatt et al 2003, Hongthong et al 2004, Tran Hoang Chat et al 2005 and Pok Samkol et al 2006 who fed water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) to rabbits. They were however higher than the weight gains by rabbits fed Stylosanthes guianensis (Hongthong et al 2004).

The animals on SMRD had the highest apparent digestibility for all the parameters and the difference was significantly different from the other diets (P<0.05) (Table 4).


Table 4.  Apparent digestibility coefficient of the dry matter and nutrient intakes of experimental diets, %

Parameter, %

CD

SMRD

CSRD

CTD

SEM

PROB

Dry matter digestibility

56.5

68.8

64.8

64.9

4.39

0.37

Digestible CP

75.4

82.5

77.5

75.9

2.07

0.09

Digestible CF

53.9c

78.2a

60.8bc

65.6b

3.33

0.005

Digestible EE

67.9bc

77.8a

63.3c

75.2ab

2.72

0.005

Digestible Ash

74.1

77.7

67.2

71.3

2.54

0.05

Digestible NFE 

98.4a

97.6ab

96.3b

88.2c

0.48

0.001

a, b Means within each row with different superscript are significantly different(P<0.05)


The results were similar to the one obtained for apparent digestibility (Raharjo et al (1986) for woody legumes but higher than that of non- woody legumes such a Centrocema pubescens that is commonly fed to rabbits in Nigeria but lower than that of rabbits on Ipomea aquatica (Hongthong et al 2004).

Carcass evaluation

Table 5 shows the means of the parameters used in determining the carcass characteristics of weaner rabbits fed CD, SMRD, CSRD and CTD diets.


Table 5.  Carcass evaluation of experimental weaner rabbits

 

Parameter (mean)

CD

SMRD

CSRD

CTD

SEM

PROB

 

Live weight, g   

1667

1671

1660

1666

30.3

0.99

 

Hot dressing, g   

873

885

854

880

17.3

0.94

 

Dressing, %             

52.5

52.9

51.3

53.3

0.85

0.87

 

Kidney weight, g    

9.60

9.30

8.50

10.4

0.40

0.46

 

Liver weight, g     

53.4a

46.6ab

44.9b

42.3b

1.58

0.05

 

Stomach weight, g 

72.0

72.2

55.8

76.1

5.36

0.59

 

Kidney fat weight, g  

27.2

30.4

27.7

31.1

1.72

0.55

 

Head weight, g   

4.9

4.8

5.4

5.1

2.29

0.90

 

Heart weight, g 

4.9

4.9

5.4 a

5.1

0.31

0.93

 

Lung weight, g 

8.1

8.6

8.9

7.6

0.36

0.61

 

Skin weight, g

174

156

153

152

4.66

0.32

 

Weight of 1cm:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Caecum weight, g

1.0b

0.6c

1.5a

0.6a

0.11

0.01

 

Small intestine, g 

0.4b

0.6ab

0.7a

0.5ab

0.04

0.03

 

a, b Means within each row with different superscript are significantly different (P<0.05)

 


Animals fed SMRD had higher mean dressing percentage, which was not significantly different from those of the rabbits, fed CSRD, CTD and CD (Table 5). The mean dressing percentage was 52.5, 52.9, 53.3 and 51.3% for animals fed DC, SMRD, CTD and CSRD diets, respectively. The kidney, stomach, kidney fat, head, heart, lung and skin observed were not significantly different (P>0.05). The liver, caecum and small intestine were significantly different (P<0.05). The mean values obtained for lung weight was 53.4, 46.6, 44.9 and 42.3g for animals fed CD, SMRD, CSRD and CTD diets, respectively; caecum was 1.5, 1.0, 0.6 and 0.6g for animals fed CSRD, CD, SMRD and CTD diets, respectively; small intestine was 0.7, 0.6, 0.5 and 0.4g for animals fed CSRD, SMRD, CTD and CD diets, respectively (P<0.05). The experimental diets had no influence on the remaining external and internal organs measured. The results agree with previous studies on rabbits` carcass characteristics (Iyayi and Odueso 2003 and Amaefule et al 2005).

Economic analysis

The costs of maize and groundnut cake as feed ingredients for the composition of weaner rabbits diet is higher than that of soybean milk residue, corn starch residue and cowpea testa. N54 per Kg, N48 per Kg, N10 per Kg, N20 per Kg and N20 per Kg for maize, groundnut cake, cowpea testa, corn starch residue and soybean milk residue respectively [1 U.S dollar ($) = 130 Nigerian naira (N)].

The residues used in this study were cheaper than conventional concentrates for rabbits and are not edible to man. Alawa et al (1990) advocated that to make rabbit rearing more viable as a small -scale business, there must be the development of alternative feeding materials that will be relatively cheap when compared with commercial feeds or conventional feedstuffs.
 

Conclusions

References

Akinfala E O, Matanmi O and Aderibigbe A O 2003 Preliminary studies on the response of weaned rabbits to whole cassava plant meal basal diets in the humid tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development 15 (4) 2003 http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd15/4/akin154.htm

Alawa J P, Karibi-Botoye D T, Ndukwe F O and Berepubo N A 1990 Effect of varying proportions of brewer's dried grains on the growth performance of young rabbits. Applied Rabbit Research 12: 252 -255

A.O.A.C 1990 Official methods of analysis. 15th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington VA, USA.

Amaefule K U, Iheukwumere F C and Nwaokoro C C 2005 A note on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of rabbits fed graded dietary levels of boiled pigeon pea seed (Cajanus cajan). Livestock Research for Rural Development 17 (5) 2005  http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/5/amae17048.htm

Arijeniwa A, Otaikhian S O and Imaseun J A 2000 Performance of weaner rabbits fed: Poultry Grower Mash supplemented with different grass legume rations. Proceedings of 5th Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria. (ASAN) September 19-22, 2000.pp. 103-105.

Hongthong Phimmmasan, Siton Kongvongxay, Chhay Ty and Preston T R 2004 Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and Stylo 184 (Stylosanthes guianensis CIAT 184) as basal diets for growing rabbits. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16 (5) 2004 http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/5/hong16034.htm

Hulman B 1988 Milk and meat production. Review of recent research work by the Ministry on Agriculture, Natural Research and the Environment. In National Agricultural Conference, University of Mauritius, Reduit. Pp 341-347

Iyayi E A and Odueso O M 2003 Response of some metabolic and Biochemical indices in rabbits fed varying levels of dietary cyanide. Africa Journal of Biomedical Research 6: 43-47

Lebas F 1988 Feed evaluation and nutritional requirements: Rabbits. Livestock Production Science 19: 289-298.

Lukefahr S D and Cheeke P R 1990 Rabbit project planning strategies for developing countries: Practical considerations. Livestock Research for Rural Development Volume 2. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd2/3/cheeke1.htm

Muir J P and Massaete E 1996 Seasonal growth in rabbits fed wheat and maize bran with tropical forages. Livestock Research for Rural Development Volume 8, Number 1 http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd8/1/muir.htm

N.R.C. 1977 Nutrient Requirement of Domestic Animals, No. 9. Nutrient Requirement of rabbits. Second Revised Edition National Academy of Science. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

Odeyinka S M, Oyedele O J and Olubunmi P A 2003 The performance of West African Dwarf Goats on Soybean milk residue, Cowpea seed waste and Corn starch residue. Livestock Research for Rural Development 15 (12) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd15/12/odey1512.htm

Omole T A and Ajayi T A 1976 Evaluation of brewer's dried grain in the evaluation of growing rabbits. Nutrition Reports International April 1976. Volume 13 Number 4.

Pok Samkol, Preston T R and Ly J 2006 Digestibility indices and N balance in growing rabbits fed a basal diet of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) supplemented with broken rice. Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (2) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/2/samk18022.htm

Raharjo T C, Cheeke P R, Patton N M and Supriyati K 1986 Evaluation of tropical forages and by-product feeds for rabbit production.1.Nutrients.digestibility and effect of heat treatment, Journal of .Applied Rabbits Research .9 (5) 6-11.

SAS 1998 SAS User's Guide Statistics, SAS Inc. Cary, North Carolina 1998 edition.

Sarwatt S V, Laswai G H and Ubwe R 2003 Evaluation of the potential of Trichanthera gigantea as a source of nutrients for rabbit diets under small holder production system in Tanzania.  Livestock Research for Rural Development 15 (11) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd15/11/sarw1511.htm

Tran Hoang Chat, Ngo Tien Dung, Dinh Van Binh and Preston T R 2005 Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) as replacement for guinea grass for growing and lactating rabbits. Livestock Research for Rural Development 17 (10) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/10/chat17109.htm



Received 24 May 2007; Accepted 5 July 2007; Published 4 September 2007

Go to top