Livestock Research for Rural Development 19 (9) 2007 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
Forage potential of Tephrosia candida as comparison with Leucaena leucocephala was investigated. Germination ability of the two forage plants was evaluated using a completely randomized design. Field trial was carried out to determine the herbage heights at 7 and 14 months post - planting (MPP), as well as the forage yield every 7 months.
Tephrosia candida seeds recorded 41.25 % germination, which was higher (P < 0.05) than the value of 27.00 % obtained for Leucaena leucocephala seeds. At 7 MPP, the herbage height of 252 .0 cm recorded for Tephrosia candida was higher (P < 0.05) than 62.0 cm obtained from Leucaena leucocephala. At 14 MPP, the same trend was observed as the height of Tephrosia candida had reached 363.0 cm while that of Leucaena leucocephala was at 138.0 cm. A forage yield of 10.82 t/ha DM was recorded for Tephrosia candida at the first 7 - month harvest while Leucaena leucocephala had not reached the height of 100 cm marked for cut - back level. At the second 7 - month harvest, the forage yield of 9.11 t/ha DM obtained for Tephrosia candida was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the yield of 7.75 t/ha DM recorded for Leucaena leucocephala.
The chemical composition of the two legumes compared well with each other in their fibre contents, ranging from 39.80 to 41.00 g/100 g DM Neutral detergent fibre, 34.30 to 36.80 g/100 g DM Acid detergent fibre, 4.20 to 4.70 g/100 g DM lignin and 30.10 to 32.10 g/100 g DM cellulose in Leucaena leucocephala and Tephrosia candida respectively. The crude protein content ranged from 21.41 g/100 g DM in Leucaena leucocephala to 17.19 g/100 g DM in Tephrosia candida, while ether extract and ash contents ranged from 9.50 to 9.00 g/100 g DM and 6.50 to 8.50 g/100 g DM respectively.
Results indicate that Tephrosia candida seed is high in germination percentage and dry matter yield. Crude protein and fibre fractions are also comparable to the traditional Leucaena leucocephala as forage for ruminants.
Key words: forage yield, germination, Leucaena leucocephala, nutrient composition, Tephrosia candida
The constraint posed by dry seasons on continual availability of pasture to livestock in Nigeria is a quandary in animal production. Dry season is a key factor that predisposes ruminants to consistent weight loss, being fed with standing hay and low protein roughages (Babayemi and Bamikole 2006). Livestock farmers in the region have intensified the supplementation of the dry season feed with shrub and tree legumes. These browse plants are low in fibre, high in crude protein and available all year round (Babayemi et al 2004). Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala are traditional browse plants in Nigeria. They are high in crude protein and minimal in fibre content but arable crop farmers are skeptical on the plants, being difficult to eradicate when they had fully established. Gliricidia sepium has limited acceptance among ruminants as it contains an offensive odour (coumarin). Leucaena leucocephala on the other hand is endowed with mimosine, an antinutritional factor that curtails the ad libitum ingestion of the plant by large and small ruminants.
Tephrosia candida is a perennial shrub found mainly in
research stations (Babayemi et al 2003a) and is commonly grown as a
shade tree for tea (Ahmed et al 1993). The plant has been described
by ABRATES (2000) as a root - nodulating legume with potential for
use in agroforestry. The plant is reported to be tolerant to a
range of soils and temperatures (Nguyen and Thai 1993), suggesting
its selection as one of the forages by farmers in Tanzania on the
basis of its biomass yield, weed suppression and tolerance to pests
and diseases (Ahmed et al 1993). Tephrosia was reported to be well
accepted with high dry matter intake, digestibility and nitrogen
utilization when supplemented for the goats in range (Babayemi and
Bamikole 2006). This study was aimed at evaluating the forage
potentials of Tephrosia candida as a possible
alternative to Leucaena leucocephala in ruminant
nutrition.
This experiment was in two phases. In the first phase, a germination trial of the legume seeds was carried out while in the second phase, field planting of the legume seeds was done. Clean, healthy looking seeds of Leucaena leucocephala were soaked in water overnight and thereafter spread out, to allow for air drying. Seeds of Tephrosia candida were mechanically scarified using the emery paper as described (Babatunde 2000).
The germination study was carried out at the forage unit laboratory of the Department of Animal Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. Treated seeds of Leucaena leucocephala and Tephrosia candida were placed in Petri dishes with transparent lid cover, lined with two layers of Whatman filter paper (12.5 cm) and watered to its moisture holding capacity, taking good care to prevent excess water film that may result in a water log around the seeds. Fifty (50) seeds each of both legumes were arranged in a regular equidistant pattern on the surface of the moist filter paper in the Petri dishes in replicates of four (n=200). Watering and germination counts began 48 hours after the commencement of the experiment according to the procedure outlined by Hanson (1985). According to this procedure, the radicles of non-hard seeds would emerge within 24 hours of sowing while most seeds that will germinate would do so within 5 days of planting. Counting and watering of the seeds were conducted everyday for a period of 14 days after which, any seed that failed to germinate was regarded as dormant and unviable. Counting was done by picking the germinated seed with the aid of forceps, and thereafter, discarding such seed. This process was repeated daily until the 14th day when the experiment terminated. The remaining seeds were counted and sorted either as rotten or dormant. Germination potential of the seeds was expressed as:
|
Photo 1: Tephrosia candida |
The field experiment was conducted at the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research farm (7º 27' N; 3º 45' E). Tephrosia candida (Photo 1) and Leucaena leucocephala seeds were established on a cultivated plot that was previously overgrown with Panicum maximum and Chromolaena odorata. Treated seeds of Tephrosia and Leucaena were planted into the soil by drilling along the rows, at the rate of 7.5 kg/ha, with inter - row spacing of 3 m apart. The legumes were planted in plot sizes of 7 x 13 m2 in four replicates. Harvesting of the herbage was done at 7 months post planting (7MPP). The plants were cut at 100 cm above ground level, with the aid of a sharp sickle. Samples of the harvested herbage were taken to the laboratory for dry matter determination by oven - drying at 65 ºC until a constant weight was obtained and thereafter the samples were further analyzed for their chemical composition using the method of AOAC (1990). Fibre analysis was done according to the method of Van Soest et al (1991), as modified by Nahm (1992).
Data from parameters measured were analyzed in a randomized
complete block design using the analysis of variance procedure of
SAS (1999) and means separated using the Duncan multiple range test
of the same package.
Germination percentage of Tephrosia candida and Leucaena leucocephala seeds is presented in Figure 1.
|
Figure 1. Germination percentages of Tephrosia candida and Leucaena leucocephala seeds |
The value of 41.25 % obtained for Tephrosia candida seeds was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that obtained for the Leucaena leucocephala seeds (27.00 %). Figure 2 showed the herbage height of the two forages when harvested at 7 months post-planting (7MPP), after which, they were cut back to 100 cm height above ground level.
|
Figure 2. Herbage height of Tephrosia candida and Leucaena leucocephala at 7 and 14 months post - planting (MPP) |
The result followed the trend observed in Figure 1, as the height of 252.00 cm obtained for Tephrosia candida was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the value of 62.00 cm recorded for Leucaena leucocephala plant. At 14 months post - planting (14MPP), the height of 138.00 cm obtained for Leucaena leucocephala was still significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that obtained for Tephrosia candida (363.00 cm).
The herbage dry matter yield of the forages is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Herbage yield (tonnes/ha DM) of Tephrosia candida at first cutting (7 MPP) and second cutting (7 months regrowth) and that of Leucaena leucocephala at first cutting (14 MPP) |
At the first harvest (7 MPP), Tephrosia candida recorded a forage yield of 10.82 tonnes/ha DM while that of Leucaena leucocephala could not be recorded because the plant had not reached the 100 cm mark for cutting back. At the second 7 - month harvest (14 months after planting Leucaena), Tephrosia candida re-growth still recorded a significantly (P < 0.05) higher yield (9.11 tonnes/ha DM) than the value of 7.75 tonnes/ha DM obtained for Leucaena leucocephala.
Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the two forages.
Table 1. Chemical composition (g/100 g DM) of Tephrosia candida and Leucaena leucocephala |
||
Nutrients |
Leucaena leucocephala |
Tephrosia candida |
Dry matter |
28.9 |
38.6 |
Crude protein |
21.4 |
17.2 |
Neutral detergent fibre |
39.8 |
41.0 |
Acid detergent fibre |
34.3 |
36.8 |
Lignin |
4.20 |
4.70 |
Cellulose |
30.1 |
32.10 |
Hemicellulose |
5.50 |
4.20 |
Ether extract |
9.50 |
9.00 |
Ash |
6.50 |
8.50 |
The
dry matter (DM) content varied from 28.9 g/100 g in Leucaena
leucocephala to 38.6 g/100 g in Tephrosia
candida, while the crude protein value ranged from 17.19
g/100 g DM in Tephrosia candida to 21.41 g/100 g DM
in L. leucocephala. The neutral detergent fibre, which is a
measure of the plant cell wall material, ranged from 39.8 g/100 g
DM in Leucaena leucocephala to 41.0 g/100 g DM in
Tephrosia candida. Acid detergent fibre and cellulose
fractions ranged from 34.30 and 30.10 g/100 g DM to 36.80 and 32.10
g/100 g DM forLeucaena leucocephala and Tephrosia
candida respectively while the hemicellulose fraction of the
legumes ranged from 4.20 to 5.50 g/100 g DM in Tephrosia
candida and Leucaena leucocephala respectively. Ether
extract, which is the measure of the lipid content of the legumes,
varied slightly from 9.00 g/100 g DM in Tephrosia
candida to 9.50 g/100 g DM in Leucaena leucocephala while
the ash content varied from 6.50 g/100 g DM in Leucaena
leucocephala, to 8.50 g/100 g. DM in Tephrosia
candida.
The result of the germination experiment suggests Tephrosia candida seed to contain a lower concentration of chemical germination inhibitors than Leucaena leucocephala seed coat. This may be partly due to the different seed treatment methods employed for the two legumes. Soaking seeds of Leucaena leucocephala in water overnight was in anticipation of any presence of germination inhibitors (Ezenwa 1999) and the mechanical scarification employed for Tephrosia candida seeds was to discourage seed dormancy effect on the germination of the seeds. The low germinability of Leucaena leucocephala could also be attributed to an inherent or genetic factor (Bradbeer 1994). The result also showed Tephrosia candida as having superior seedling vigour over Leucaena leucocephala, as the seedling vigour can be judged from the plant's herbage height and forage yield.
The relatively slow growth and subsequently low yield of Leucaena leucocephala is attributable to its slow growth at its early stages of seedling and young plant in the absence of a nitrogen starter dose (Bogdan 1977; Garcia et al 1996). This, however, is at variance with the report of Cocks and Thomson (1988) that Leucaena species flourishes well in the absence of expensive nitrogenous fertilizers. The high herbage yield and height obtained for Tephrosia candida was in agreement with the report of Babayemi et al (2003a) that Tephrosia species are early maturing. The yield of 10.82 tonnes/ha DM obtained for Tephrosia candida in this study was higher than the yield of 7.93 and 9.28 tonnes/ha DM reported by Muller et al (1992) from Tephrosia candida planted on different sites in Brazil. Similarly, the value of 4.69 tonnes/ha DM reported for Leucaena leucocephala after second year of planting by Barnes (1995) was lower than 7.75 tonnes/ha DM obtained at 14MPP in this study. These disparities in yield could be a result of the differences in the soil fertility and the amount of rainfall in the year of establishment.
The nutrient composition obtained for Leucaena leucocephala forage was within the reported range (Topps 1992; Garcia et al 1996). The apparently high ADF value of Leucaena was probably due to the high cellulose content of the forage and is comparable as reported by Garcia (1988 Missing). The CP value of Leucaena leucocephala obtained in this study is close to 23.0 g/100 g reported by Tangendjaja and Wina (1995) but lower than 26.9 g/100 g as established by Serra et al (1996). The NDF value of 39.8 g/100 g obtained in this study is however higher than 34.0 and 31.4 g/100 g reported elsewhere (Tangendjaja and Wina 1995; Serra et al 1996). The value of 17.2 g/100 g CP obtained for Tephrosia candida obtained in this study is higher than 10.8 and 11.4 g/100 g reported for Tephrosia uniflora and T. villosa respectively (Lamprey et al 1980) but lower than 22.3 g/100 g reported for T. bracteolata (Ayoade, et al 1998). The higher CP value reported by Ayoade et al (1998) was probably due to the fact that Tephrosia bracteolata is an annual plant, and so might have been harvested at earlier period than that of Tephrosia candida which is a sub - perennial plant. However, the values of 15.3 g/100 g and 16.2 g/100 g CP reported for T. bracteolata by Adeloye (1994) and Anugwa et al (2000) respectively, corroborated the value obtained for Tephrosia candida in the present study. The nutrient composition obtained for Tephrosia candida was at variance with the values reported by Babayemi et al (2003b). The differences may be due to the age of the plant at harvest and the season of harvest. The Tephrosia candida analyzed by Babayemi et al (2003a) was harvested at 18 weeks while those used in this study were at 7 months of age. The time of harvest, in this study, coincided with the period at which Tephrosia candida was about flowering while Leucaena leucocephala was yet coming up, being a 'late starter' (Bogdan 1977; Garcia et al 1996). The CP values obtained for both forages are well above the required minimum requirements of 11.9 g/100 g and 12.4 g/100 g recommended for growing and lactating 400 kg cow (NRC 1981), suggesting its adequacy for ruminants nutrition. The fibre contents of the two legumes as well as their lipid contents are comparable but Tephrosia candida appeared to be richer in total mineral contents than Leucaena leucocephala as reflected in their ash contents.
The variability obtained for the legumes' agronomic parameters
measured in this study could be as a result of their seedling
vigour, which may be related to the different pre - sowing
treatment methods employed for their seeds.
Tephrosia candida possess good agronomic
potentials to either complement or substitute Leucaena
leucocephala as a forage source for ruminant livestock and is
capable of meeting the nutrient requirements of the ruminant
livestock especially in the tropics, where forage availability is
still a critical factor in animal production.
ABRATES 2000 Revista Brasileira de Sementes. Brasilia, Brazil: Associacao Brasileira de Tecnologia de Sementes. ABRATES 22 (2): 193 - 199 Portuguese
Adeloye A A 1994 Preliminary investigations of Parkia filicoidea and Tephrosia bracteolata leaf meals in the diet of goat. Nigeria Journal of Animal Production 21: 105 - 107.
Ahmed N, Bezbaruah H P and Singh I D 1993 Germination and storage of shade tree seeds. Two - and - a - Bud 40 (2): 34 - 37.
Anugwa F O I, Okwori A I and Ekwuno P O 2000 Feed intake, nutrient digestibility and nutrient value for goats on Panicum maximum and selected browse in the Southern guinea savannah zone of Nigeria. In: Ikachukwu et al (editors), Animal production in the new millennium: Challenges and options. Proceedings of the 25th NSAP conference held at Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Abia state, Nigeria, pp 63 - 66.
AOAC 1990Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical chemists, 15th edition, Washington DC, USA.
Ayoade J A, Ogebe P O, Okwori A I and Ogbeide J O 1988 Nutritional potential of Tephrosia bracteolata leaves as sole feed for goats. In: Oduguwa et al (editors), Animal agriculture in West Africa: The sustainability question. Proceedings of the silver anniversary conference of NSAP and the Inaugural conference of WASAP at Gateway hotel, Abeokuta, Nigeria, 21 -26 March, pp53 - 54.
Babatunde O O 2000 Preliminary studies on seed germination, seedling vigour and rumen degradation of Tephrosia species. MSc. Project, University of Ibadan, 119 pp.
Babayemi O J and M A Bamikole 2006 Supplementary value of Tephrosia bracteolata, Tephrosia candida, Leucaena leucocephala and Gliricidia sepium hay for West African dwarf goats kept on range. Journal Central European Agriculture 7 (2): 323-328
Babayemi O J, Bamikole M A and Oduguwa B O 2003a Intensive feeding of Tephrosia bracteolata (Perr and Guill) on West African Dwarf goats. Nigeria Journal of Ecology 5: 28 - 33.
Babayemi O J, Bamikole M A, Daniel I O, Ogungbesan A and Babatunde O 2003b Growth, nutritive value and dry matter degradability of Tephrosia species. Nigeria Journal of Animal Production 30 (1): 62 - 70.
Babayemi O J, Demeyer D and Fievez V 2004 Nutritive value and qualitative assessment of secondary compounds in seeds of eight tropical browse, shrub and pulse legumes. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, Ghent University 69 [1]: 103- 110
Barnes P 1995 Dry matter herbage productivity and aspects of chemical composition in four forage shrub legume at a sub - humid site in Ghana. Agroforesty Systems 31: 223 - 227.
BogdanA V 1977 Tropical pastures and Fodder plants (Grasses and Legumes), Longman, New York.475pp.
Bradbeer J W 1994 Seed dormancy and germination.Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall, London, pp 55 - 79.
Cocks P S and Thomson E F 1988 Increased feed resources for small ruminants in the Mediterranean basin. In: Thomson F S and Thomson E F (editors), Increasing small ruminant productivity in semi - arid areas. ICARDA, Kluwer Academic publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51 - 66.
EzenwaI V 1999 Preliminary evaluation of the suitability of Enterolobium cyclocarpum for use in Intensive feed garden in Southwestern Nigeria. Agroforestry Systems 44: 13 - 19.
Garcia G W, Ferguson T U, Neckles F A and Archibald K A E 1996 The nutritive value and forage productivity of Leucaena leucocephala. Animal Feed Science and Technology 60: 29 - 41.
Hanson J 1985 Procedures for handling seeds in gene banks. Practical manual for gene banks. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, pp 56 - 63.
Lamprey H F, Horlocker D J and Field C R 1980 Report on the state of knowledge on browse in East Africa. In: Le Houreou H N (editor.), Browse in Africa (The current state of knowledge). Paper presented at the International symposium on browse in Africa, ILCA, Addis Ababa, April 8 - 12, pp50. http://www.ilri.org/InfoServ/Webpub/Fulldocs/Browse_in_Africa/Chapter4.htm#TopOfPage
Muller N R M, Muller A A and Oliveira R P 1992 Use of legumes for biomass production. Uso de leguminosas para producao de biomassa. Documentos Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuaria do Tropico Umido. 67: 111 - 120 Portuguese
Nahm K H 1992 Practical guide to feed, forage and water analysis (Accurate analysis with minimal equipment). Yoo Han Publishing Inc., Seoul, Korea Republic, 269 pp.
Nguyen T S and Thai P 1993 Tephrosia candida - a soil ameliorator plant in Vietnam. Contour, Jarkata. 5 (1): 27 - 28.
NRC (National Research Council) 1981 Effect of environment on nutrient requirements of domestic animals. Washington, DC, National Academy press. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4963&page=R1
SAS 1999 Statistical Analysis System, SAS/ STAT User's guide, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Serra S D, Serra A B, Ichinoche T, Harvinoto T and Fujihara T 1996 Amount and distribution of dietary minerals in selected Phillippine forages. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 9: 139 - 147.
Tangendjaja B and Wina E 1995 Chemical evaluation of shrub legumes. Indonesia Agricultural Research Agricultural Research and Development Journal 17(3): 47 – 58.
Topps J H 1992 Potential, composition and use of legume shrubs and trees as fodder or livestock in the tropics - a review. Journal of Agricultural Science 118: 1 - 18.
Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non - starch polysaccarides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583 - 3597. http://jds.fass.org/cngi/reprint/74/10/3583.pdf
Received 11 March 2007; Accepted 10 August 2007; Published 5 September 2007