Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (6) 2006 | Guidelines to authors | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
Two experiments were done with crossbred rabbits (Local x New Zealand White) (range of live weight from 1600 to 1800 g), fed either stems or leaves of water spinach as sole diets. In the first study, observations were made of time spent eating, times spent consuming caecotrophes and voiding faeces. In the second experiment the effect on feed intake of depriving the rabbits of having access to the caecotrophes was monitored. The third experiment examined the composition of stomach contents of 2 rabbits on each diet slaughtered at 4 hour intervals over a 24 hour period.
The rabbits consumed feed throughout the 24 hours. However, the consumption of caecotrophes was mainly during the day while faeces were voided only at night time. There were no differences between the two diets in the diurnal pattern of eating, consuming caecotrophes or voiding of faeces. However, total DM intake was higher when leaves were fed compared with feeding only the stems. The composition of the stomach contents, which included the caecotrophes, mirrored those of the diet with higher protein and lower crude fiber contents when the diet was water spinach leaves compared with stems. There were marked diurnal trends in the composition of the stomach contents during the 24 hours for the rabbits fed water spinach stems, with maximum values at midnight for DM and crude protein and minimum values for crude fiber. These trends were less marked on the diet of water spinach leaves
It was concluded that feeding water spinach leaves rather than stems resulted in a lower production of caecotrophes. It is suggested that the lower level of caecotrophs consumed on the leaves only diet may have reduced overall supply of protein and B vitamins (from caecal microbes). .Lower levels of caecal-produced nutrients of microbial origin could explain the poorer growth performance of rabbits observed in earlier trials when high offer levels of the water spinach led to increased selection of leaves at the expense of the stems.
Key words: Caecotrophes, diurnal patters of behaviour, faeces, leaves, rabbits, stems, water spinach
Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) is a valuable feed resource for rabbits, apparently providing adequate protein and energy and other essential nutrients for growth. It also provides sufficient water (Hongthong Phimmasan et al 2004; Pok Samkol et al 2006a). When used to replace grass in a diet, in which 50% of the DM came from concentrates, rates of growth and feed conversion of rabbits were improved by more than 25% (Tran Hoang Chat et al. 2005). Pok Samkol et al (2006b) showed that increasing the proportion of stem to leaf and thus the fiber content in a water spinach diet improved live weight gain and feed conversion. This was possibly mediated by stimulation of feed intake since DM intake was increased by 50% when rabbits had access to other sources of high-fiber feeds (grass and rice straw) in addition to water spinach (Pok Samkol, Unpublished data). The present experiment was aimed at investigating the interaction of dietary fiber and growth rate, through further study of caecotrophes produced and the content of the stomach in rabbits given either high fiber "stem" or low fiber "leaves" of water spinach.
It was hypothesized that:
Offering the stems (high fiber) and leaves (low fiber) of water spinach as separate feeds will influence the composition of the caecotrophes and the pattern of recycling and thus help to explain the differences in growth rate of rabbits fed varying proportions of leaves and stems as the sole diet.
Three experiments were conducted at the Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid-UTA Cambodia) located in Pratheat village, Rolous commune, Kandal Stroeung district, Kandal province, Cambodia which is 26 km from Phnom Penh city.
Four crossbred (Local x New Zealand White) rabbits with average live weight of 1625 ± 119 g were allocated to two treatments:
WST: Stems of water spinach
WSL: Leaves of water spinach
The design was a randomized block arrangement with two replications of each treatment. The diets were fed ad libitum (about 120% of recorded intakes). The rabbits were housed in individual cages constructed from wood and wire mesh. The dimensions of the cages were: width 0.5 m, length 0.7 m and height 0.5 m.
Water spinach was bought from traders near the lake of Cheung Ek, Phnom Penh City. The foliage was separated into stems and leaves and the proportions recorded. The feeds were offered in a trough, three times per day in the morning at 7:00 am, at 12:00 and at 4:00 pm. Water was not supplied as earlier observations (Miech Phalla, personal communication) indicated that rabbits were able to satisfy their needs for water from that contained in the water spinach which has about 90% of moisture.
Feed intake was recorded from weights of fresh materials offered minus residue taken the next morning. Observations were started at 7:00 am by two people to record minutes spent eating, in consumption of caecotrophes and excretion of faeces. Samples of feeds offered and refused were analysed for DM,
Four crossbred (Local x New Zealand White) rabbits with average live weight of 1813 ± 136 g were allocated to the same treatments, housing and feeding method as in Experiment 1. Plastic collars were out around the necks (Photo 1) to prevent the rabbits consuming the caecotrophes.
Photo 1: Rabbit fitted with plastic collar to prevent consumption of caecotrophes |
Feed intake and production of caecotrophes and faeces were recorded every hour. Caecotrophes were not fed back to the rabbits. The measurements were started at 8:00 am by two people. Samples of feed offered and refused and of caecotrophes and faeces were taken for analysis of DM.
This was the same as in Experiment 1.
24 crossbred (Local x New Zealand White) rabbits with average live weight of 1811 ± 301 g were allocated to the same treatments as in Experiment 1. Housing and feeding arrangements were the same as in Experiment 1.
Feed intake was recorded from 7.00 am until the time of slaughter, which began at 12:00 am with 2 animals being slaughtered every 4 hours. Samples of feed offered and refused, of caecotrophes and faeces and of stomach contents, were taken for analysis of DM. N, ash and crude fiber.
Chemical analyses of samples for for ash, N, and crude fiber were by the methods proposed by AOAC (1990). DM content was determined using the micro-wave method of Undersander et al (1993).
The data were analysed using the GLM option of the Minitab (version 13.31, 2000) ANOVA software. The sources of variation were treatments and error.
Water spinach leaves had higher contents of dry matter, crude protein and organic matter and much less crude fiber than the stems (Table 1).
Table 1: Chemical composition of feed (% in dry matter except for DM which is on fresh basis) |
|||||
|
Dry matter |
Crude protein |
Ash |
Organic matter |
Crude fiber |
Water spinach |
|||||
Stems |
6.74 |
15.6 |
18.2 |
81.8 |
17.2 |
Leaves |
14.0 |
31.9 |
10.8 |
89.2 |
8.58 |
Crude protein is N*6.25 |
Eating took place throughout the 24 hours (Figure 1), but intake of caecotrophes was mainly during the day (7.00 to 17.00 hours; Figure 2), while faeces were voided only at night (Figure 3). These observations are different to those of Lebas et al (1997) who reported that caecotrophes are produced in the night time and the faeces during the day. However, McNitt et al (1996) indicated that caecotrophes may also be produced by rabbits in the day time. Differences in environmental temperatures between temperate and tropical latitudes may have been the reason for the observed differences.
Figure 1: Time spent by rabbits in eating when offered either leaves or stems of water spinach. |
Figure 2: Time spent by rabbits eating the caecotrophes when offered either leaves or stems of water spinach. |
Figure 3: Time spent by rabbits voiding faeces when offered either leaves or stems of water spinach. |
The pattern of DM intake expressed as quantities consumed (Figure 4) was similar to the observations for times spent eating (Figure 1), indicating that the rate of eating was more or less continuous during the 24-hour period of measurement. However, there were major differences in the pattern of production of caecotrophes (Figures 2 and 5), which were consistent for leaves and stems and took place during the day in rabbits used in experiment 1 but was irregular in rabbits used in experiment 2, with peaks of production during both day and night and no consistent pattern for the two diets. In experiment 2, the rabbits were fitted with plastic collars to prevent them consuming the caecotrophes, which were not fed back to the rabbits. The pattern of production of faeces also differed between the two experiments, with similar quantities being produced during the night as during the day in experiment 2 (Figure 6), whereas, in experiment 1, faeces were produced only during the day (Figure 3).
Providing rabbits with water spinach stems rather than leaves resulted in a slightly greater production of caecotrophes. However, as well as having more fiber, the stems also have less protein and Cheeke (1994) indicated that the lower the crude protein concentration in the diet the greater is the consumption of the caecotrophes.
Figure 4: Diurnal pattern of DM intake of rabbits offered stems or leaves of water spinach. |
Figure 5: Diurnal pattern of production of caecotrophes by rabbits offered stems or leaves of water spinach. |
Figure 6: Diurnal pattern of production of hard faces by rabbits offered stems or leaves of water spinach. |
The amounts of caecotrophes produced on the water spinach diets in this study were similar to the results of Colin and Lebas (1995), lower than reported for Paprika meal and Olive leaves (Garcia et al 2000), but higher than for diets of alfalfa hay, citrus pulp, beet pulp and rice hulls (Fragaet al 1990) (Figure 7).
Figure 7: Production of caecotrophes by rabbits given either stems or leaves of water spinach in Experiment 2 compared with literature values. |
There were no apparent differences between the two diets (leaves or stems of water spinach) in the diurnal pattern of eating, consumption pattern of caecotrophes or voiding of hard faeces by rabbits. However, total DM intake was higher when leaves were fed compared with feeding only the stems, in rabbits in both experiments 1 and 2 (Figure 8). Although not strictly comparable, as the observations relate to two separate experiments with different rabbits, there was a clear indication of lower DM intake when the rabbits were prevented from consuming the caecotrophes (Experiment 2), which is contrary to the findings of Chiv Phiny and Lampheuy Kaensombath (2006) that DM intake was the same when rabbits fed water spinach had, or did not have, access to the caecotrophes. However, growth rates in the latter experiment were considerably less for rabbits deprived of the caecotrophes. It would appear that the physical disruption of the normal pattern of behaviour (by fitting the plastic collars) affected the physiological processes of digestion, even though the basal diet was highly digestible (80.5%; Pok Samkol et al 2006a). This result is similar to that reported by Irlbeck (2001) who also used a diet of high digestibility.
Figure 8: Dry matter intake by rabbits offered leaves or stems of water spinach with access to caecotrophes (Experiment 1) and without access to caecotrophes (Experiment 2) |
The composition of the stomach contents, which included the caecotrophes, mirrored those of the diet with higher protein and lower crude fiber contents when the diet was water spinach leaves compared with stems (Table 2 and Figures 9, 10 and 11). The dry matter content of caecotrophes on the two diets was similar, but crude protein was higher and crude fiber lower for the diet of water spinach leaves (Table 2). The contents of dry matter and crude protein in the faeces was higher for the diet of water spinach leaves than for stems. The chemical composition of both caecotrophes and faeces was similar to the result of Chiv Phiny and Lampheuy Kaensombath (2006). Irlbeck (2001) indicated that as dietary fiber concentration increased the fiber composition of the faeces also increased.
Table 2: Chemical composition (% in DM except for DM which is on fresh basis) of caecotrophes and faeces in rabbits fed water spinach stems and leaves compared with stomach contents (which includes caecotrophes). |
|||||
|
Dry matter |
Crude protein |
Ash |
Organic matter |
Crude fiber |
Water spinach stems |
|||||
Stomach contents# |
12.3 |
33.8 |
10.1 |
89.9 |
18.1 |
Caecotrophes ## |
29.3 |
42.6 |
12.8 |
87.2 |
9.66 |
Faeces ## |
70.7 |
38.4 |
14.5 |
85.5 |
28.0 |
Water spinach leaves |
|||||
Stomach contents# |
9.60 |
48.6 |
11.3 |
88.7 |
7.15 |
Caecotrophes ## |
30.9 |
47.7 |
9.21 |
90.8 |
6.15 |
Faeces ## |
63.8 |
43.5 |
11.9 |
88.1 |
12.3 |
# This experiment; ## Pok Samkol Unpublished data |
There were marked diurnal trends in the composition of the stomach contents during the 24 hours for the rabbits fed water spinach stems, with maximum values at midnight for DM and crude protein (Figures 9 and 10) and minimum values for crude fiber (Figure 11). These trends were less marked on the diet of water spinach leaves.
Figure 9: Dry matter percentage in the stomach contents of rabbits slaughtered at 4 h intervals starting at midday having had free access to leaves or stems of water spinach. |
Figure 10: Crude protein in the stomach contents of rabbits slaughtered at 4 h intervals starting at midday having had free access to leaves or stems of water spinach. |
Figure 11: Crude fiber in the stomach contents of rabbits slaughtered at 4 h intervals starting at midday having had free access to leaves or stems of water spinach. |
Stomach contents as percentage of live weight (DM basis) tended to be higher when the rabbits were fed water spinach stems compared with the leaves (Figure 12). The present finding was much lower than the 2.44% reported by Fraga et al (1990) for rabbits fed a diet in which the fiber was from alfalfa hay. The difference can probably be explained on the basis of the higher fiber content of the alfalfa hay compared with water spinach
Figure 12 : Stomach contents as % of live weight in rabbits fed either stems or leaves of water spinach. |
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick, editor). Arlington. pp 1230.
Chiv Phiny and Lampheuy Kaensombath 2006 Effect on feed intake and growth of depriving rabbits access to soft faeces. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 18, Article # 34. Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/03/phin18034.htm
Cheeke P R 1994 Nutrition and nutritional diseases. In: P J Manning, D H Ringler and C E Newcomer (ed.). The biology of the laboratory rabbit. 2nd edition p. 321. Academic Press, New York.
Colin M and Lebas F 1995 Le lapin dans le monde. Association Francaise de Cuniculture [editors] Page 330 BP 5063370 Lampedes.
Hongthong Phimmmasan, Siton Kongvongxay, Chhay Ty and Preston T R 2004 Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and Stylo 184 (Stylosanthes guianensis CIAT 184) as basal diets for growing rabbits. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Vol. 16, Art. #34. Retrieved , from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd16/5/hong16034.htm
Fraga M J, Péres de Ayala P, Carabano R and de Blas J C 1990 Effect of type of fiber on the rate of pasaje and on the contribution of soft faeces to nutrient intake of finishing rabbits. Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Garcia J, Carabano R, Pérez-Alba L and de Blas J C 2000 Effect of fibre source on cecal fermentation and nitrogen recycled through cecotrophy in rabbit. J. Anim. Sci. 2000 (78): 638-646.
Irlbeck N A 2001 How to feed the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) gastrointestinal tract. In: J. Anim. Sci. 79 p. 344. Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171.
Lebas F, Coudert P, Rochambeau H de and Thébault R G 1997 The Rabbit - Husbandry, Health and Production. FAO Animal Production and Health Series No. 21.
McNitt J I, Patton N M, Lukefahr S D and Cheeke P R 1996 Rabbit production (7th edition). Interstate Publishers Inc. Danville, Illinois.
Pok Samkol, Preston T R and Ly J 2006a Digestibility indices and N balance in growing rabbits fed a basal diet of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) supplemented with broken rice. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 18, Article # 19. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/02/samk18019.htm
Pok Samkol, Preston T R and Ly J 2006b Effect of increasing offer level of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) on intake, growth and digestibility coefficients of rabbits. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 18, Article #25. Retrieved March 7, 2006, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/2/samk18025.htm
Tran Hoang Chat, Ngo Tien Dung, Dinh Van Binh and Preston T R 2005 Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) as replacement for guinea grass for growing and lactating rabbits. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 17, Article #109. Retrieved November 23, 2005, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/10/chat17109.htm
Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha. pp 154.
Received 23 January 2006; Accepted 10 May 2006; Published 14 June 2006